Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T20:01:22.582Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of sowing date and nitrogen rate on the grain yield, grain quality and malt analyses of spring malting barley for distilling in Ireland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2018

E. M. Potterton  and
T. McCabe
E. M. Potterton*
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Republic of Ireland Boortmalt, The Maltings, Athy, Co. Kildare, Republic of Ireland
T. McCabe
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Republic of Ireland
*
Author for correspondence: E. M. Potterton, E-mail: max.potterton@boortmalt.com, edward.potterton@ucdconnect.ie
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The significant expansion of whiskey distillation in Ireland has increased requirements on the Irish malting barley industry to supply spring barley with low grain nitrogen concentration (GNC). Published literature suggests that genetics, soil type and environmental conditions are the predominant drivers controlling production of malting barley with low GNC values. However, it is acknowledged that agronomic practices such as sowing date and nitrogen (N) application are also important factors in determining the grain yield (GY) and grain quality (GQ) of malting barley. The effects of four N fertilizer rates (90, 110, 130 and 150 kg N/ha) and two sowing dates (March and April) on GY and GQ of a two-row spring barley variety (Hordeum vulgare L. cvar Overture) was evaluated at two different sites over a 3-year period (2014–2016). Earlier sowing dates resulted in significantly higher mean GY (7.98 t/ha) compared with later sowing dates (7 t/ha). GY and GNC also increased consistently with greater increments of fertilizer N. Earlier sowing dates also significantly improved several distilling malt quality parameters, such as soluble extract (SE), fermentable extract, predicted spirit yield and fermentability. Later sowing dates increased diastatic power and soluble N. The results of the current study suggest that the likelihood of producing spring malting barley with low GNC values and better malting quality is enhanced through earlier sowing dates on suitable soil types. Earlier sowing dates also facilitated the use of higher fertilizer N rates, enabling high GY potential without crossing the GNC threshold for the distilling market.

Keywords

Malting barley qualitynitrogen ratesowing date
Type
Crops and Soils Research Paper
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 156 , Issue 4 , May 2018 , pp. 515 - 527
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abeledo, LG, Calderini, DF and Slafer, GA (2008) Nitrogen economy in old and modern malting barleys. Field Crops Research 106, 171–178.Google Scholar
Acreche, MM and Slafer, GA (2009) Variation of grain nitrogen content in relation with grain yield in old and modern Spanish wheats grown under a wide range of agronomic conditions in a Mediterranean region. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 147, 657–667.Google Scholar
Agu, RC and Palmer, GH (2001) The effect of nitrogen level on the performance of malting barley varieties during germination. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 107, 93–98.Google Scholar
Andersson, A and Holm, L (2011) Effects of mild temperature stress on grain quality and root and straw nitrogen concentration in malting barley cultivars. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 197, 466–476.Google Scholar
Anon (2014) Publications and Information about Crop Variety Evaluation. Dublin, Ireland: Department of Agriculture, Food and The Marine.Google Scholar
Anon (2015) Statbank – Agriculture Area Used and Crop Production Statistics. Cork, Ireland: Central Statistics Office.Google Scholar
Anon (2017) Export Performance and Prospects: Irish Food, Drink & Horticulture 2016–2017. Dublin, Ireland: Bord Bia (Irish Food Board).Google Scholar
Arends, AM, Fox, GP, Henry, RJ, Marschke, RJ and Symons, MH (1995) Genetic and environmental variation in the diastatic power of Australian barley. Journal of Cereal Science 21, 63–70.Google Scholar
Atherton, M (1984) Quality requirements: malting barley. In Gallagher, EJ (ed.) Cereal Production, 1st Edn. Dublin, Ireland: Butterworth and Co (Publishers) Ltd, pp. 119–130.Google Scholar
Bathgate, GN (2016) A review of malting and malt processing for whisky distillation. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 122, 197–211.Google Scholar
Bathgate, GN, Martinez-Frias, J and Stark, JR (1978) Factors controlling the fermentable extract in distillers’ malt. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 84, 22–29.Google Scholar
Birch, CJ and Long, KE (1990) Effect of nitrogen on the growth, yield and grain protein content of barley (Hordeum vulgare). Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 30, 237–242.Google Scholar
Bishop, LR (1930) The nitrogen content and ‘quality’ of barley. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 36, 352–369.Google Scholar
Bogard, M, Allard, V, Brancourt-Hulmel, M, Heumez, E, Machet, JM, Jeuffroy, MH, Gate, P, Martre, P and Le Gouis, J (2010) Deviation from the grain protein concentration-grain yield negative relationship is highly correlated to post-anthesis N uptake in winter wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany 61, 4303–4312.Google Scholar
Briggs, DE (1998) Malts and Malting, 1st Edn. London, UK: Blackie Academic.Google Scholar
Bringhurst, TA (2015) 125th anniversary review: barley research in relation to scotch whisky production: a journey to new frontiers. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 121, 1–18.Google Scholar
Bringhurst, TA and Brosnan, J (2014) Scotch whisky: raw material selection and processing. In Russell, I and Stewart, G (eds), Whisky: Technology, Production and Marketing. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, pp. 49–122.Google Scholar
Bringhurst, TA, Glasgow, E, Agu, RC, Brosnan, JM and Thomas, WTB (2008) Varietal and site interactions in the growing of malting barley for distilling and brewing. In Ceccarelli, C and Grando, S (eds), Proceedings of the 10th International Barley Genetics Symposium. Aleppo, Syria: ICARDA, pp. 416–427.Google Scholar
Conry, MJ (1987) Soils of Co. Laois. Soil Survey Bulletin No. 41. Dublin, Ireland: An Foras Talúntais.Google Scholar
Conry, MJ (1994) Comparative effect of six cultivars at four rates of nitrogen on the grain yield and grain quality of spring-sown malting barley in Ireland. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 122, 343–350.Google Scholar
Conry, MJ (1995) Comparison of early, normal and late sowing at three rates of nitrogen on the yield, grain nitrogen and screenings content of Blenheim spring malting barley in Ireland. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 125, 183.Google Scholar
Conry, MJ (1998) Influence of seed rate and sowing date on the yield and grain quality of Blenheim spring malting barley in the south-east of Ireland. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 130, 307–315.Google Scholar
Cranstoun, D (1999) Effects of Sowing and Harvest Dates, Nitrogen, PGR and Fungicide on Yield and Quality of Spring Barley. (Project Report No. 179). London, UK: Home Grown Cereals Authority.Google Scholar
Cranstoun, DAS and Garstang, JR (1993) The effect of husbandry inputs on the quality of spring malting barley with special reference to screenings. Aspects of Applied Biology 36, 211–220.Google Scholar
de Ruiter, JM and Brooking, IR (1996) Effect of sowing date and nitrogen on dry matter and nitrogen partitioning in malting barley. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 24, 65–76.Google Scholar
Dolan, TCS (2000) Scotch malt whisky distillers malted barley specifications. Twenty years of fermentable extract and predicted spirit yield. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 106, 245–250.Google Scholar
Edney, MJ, Eglinton, JK, Collins, HM, Barr, AR, Legge, WG and Rossnagel, BG (2007) Importance of endosperm modification for malt wort fermentability. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 113, 228–238.Google Scholar
Edney, MJ, O'Donovan, JT, Turkington, TK, Clayton, GW, McKenzie, R, Juskiw, P, Lafond, GP, Brandt, S, Grant, CA, Harker, KN, Johnson, E and May, W (2012) Effects of seeding rate, nitrogen rate and cultivar on barley malt quality. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 92, 2672–2678.Google Scholar
Emebiri, LC and Moody, DB (2004) Potential of low-protein genotypes for nitrogen management in malting barley production. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 142, 319–325.Google Scholar
Evans, D, Collins, H, Eglinton, J and Wilhelmson, A (2005) Assessing the impact of the level of diastatic power enzymes and their thermostability on the hydrolysis of starch during wort production to predict malt fermentability. Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists 63, 185–198.Google Scholar
Fischer, RA, Howe, GN and Ibrahim, Z (1993) Irrigated spring wheat and timing and amount of nitrogen fertilizer. I. Grain yield and protein content. Field Crops Research 33, 37–56.Google Scholar
Froment, MA, McDonald, HG and Withers, PJA (1993) Grain yield and quality in spring barley: effect of sowing date and nitrogen rate. Aspects of Applied Biology 36, 355–360.Google Scholar
Gardiner, MJ and Ryan, P (1965) Soils of Co. Wexford. Soil Survey Bulletin No. 1. Dublin, Ireland: An Foras Taluntais.Google Scholar
Gately, T (1971) Effect of form of nitrogen and the stage of application on the yield and quality of malting barley (cultivar Proctor). Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 10, 173–184.Google Scholar
Grashoff, C and D'Antuono, LF (1997) Effect of shading and nitrogen application on yield, grain size distribution and concentrations of nitrogen and water-soluble carbohydrates in malting spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). European Journal of Agronomy 6, 275–293.Google Scholar
Gressick, D and Cantrell, IC (1993) Expression of extract of distilling malts on a percentage basis: changes in relational factors following the 1979 revision of the IOB method of extract determination. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 99, 135–135.Google Scholar
Heitholt, JJ, Croy, LI, Maness, NO and Nguyen, HT (1990) Nitrogen partitioning in genotypes of winter wheat differing in grain N concentration. Field Crops Research 23, 133–144.Google Scholar
IOB (1997) IOB Methods of Analysis. Vol. 1. Analytical Methods. London, UK: Institute of Brewing.Google Scholar
Juskiw, PE and Helm, JH (2003) Barley response to seeding date in central Alberta. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 83, 275–281.Google Scholar
Kennedy, SP, Bingham, IJ and Spink, JH (2017) Determinants of spring barley yield in a high-yield potential environment. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 155, 60–80.Google Scholar
Lauer, JG and Partridge, JR (1990) Planting date and nitrogen rate effects on spring malting barley. Agronomy Journal 82, 1083–1088.Google Scholar
Le Bail, M and Meynard, J (2003) Yield and protein concentration of spring malting barley: the effects of cropping systems in the Paris Basin (France). Agronomie 23, 13–27.Google Scholar
Lord, EI and Vaughan, J (1987) Optimising nitrogen applications for the production of malting barley. Aspects of Applied Biology 15(Cereal Quality), 319–335.Google Scholar
Martin, RJ and Daly, MJ (1993) Management of Triumph’ barley for high yield and malting quality on light soils in Canterbury, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 21, 1–16.Google Scholar
McTaggart, IP and Smith, KA (1995) The effect of rate, form and timing of fertilizer N on nitrogen uptake and grain N content in spring malting barley. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 125, 341–353.Google Scholar
Meredith, WOS, Anderson, JA and Hudson, LE (1962) Evaluation of malting barley. In Cook, AH (ed.) Barley and Malt: Biology, Biochemistry, Technology, 1st Edn. London, UK: Academic Press Inc, pp. 207–268.Google Scholar
Molina-Cano, JL, Swanston, JS, Moralejo, M, Polo, JP, Rubio, A and Macgregor, AW (2004) Environmental modulation of barley malting quality. In Spunar, J and Janikova, J (eds), Proceedings of the 9th International Barley Genetics Symposium. Brno, Czech Republic: Agricultural Research Institute Kromeriz Ltd, pp. 159–166.Google Scholar
O'Donovan, JT, Turkington, TK, Edney, MJ, Clayton, GW, McKenzie, RH, Juskiw, PE, Lafond, GP, Grant, CA, Brandt, SA, Harker, KN, Johnson, EN and May, WE (2011) Seeding rate, nitrogen rate, and cultivar effects on malting barley production. Agronomy Journal 103, 709–716.Google Scholar
O'Donovan, JT, Turkington, TK, Edney, MJ, Juskiw, PE, McKenzie, RH, Harker, KN, Clayton, GW, Lafond, GP, Grant, CA, Brandt, S, Johnson, EN, May, WE and Smith, E (2012) Effect of seeding date and seeding rate on malting barley production in western Canada. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 92, 321–330.Google Scholar
O'Donovan, JT, Edney, MJ, Izydorczyk, MS, Turkington, TK, Juskiw, PE, McKenzie, RH, Grant, CA, Harker, KN, May, WE, Johnson, EN, Smith, EG and Clayton, GW (2016) Effect of seeding date and rate on malting barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) quality. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 97, 10–13.Google Scholar
Savin, R and Molina-Cano, J (2002) Changes in malting quality and its determinants in response to abiotic stresses. In Slafer, GA, Molina-Cano, JL, Savin, R, Araus, JL and Romagosa, I (eds), Barley Science: Recent Advances from Molecular Biology to Agronomy of Yield and Quality, 1st Edn. New York, USA: Food Products Press Inc, pp. 523–550.Google Scholar
Schelling, K, Born, K, Weissteiner, C and Kuhbauch, W (2003) Relationships between yield and quality parameters of malting barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and phenological and meteorological data. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 189, 113–122.Google Scholar
Simmonds, NW (1995) The relation between yield and protein in cereal grain. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 67, 309–315.Google Scholar
Spiertz, JHJ and De Vos, NM (1983) Agronomical and physiological aspects of the role of nitrogen in yield formation of cereals. Plant and Soil 75, 379–391.Google Scholar
Swanston, JS, Thomas, WTB, Powell, W, Meyer, R, Bringhurst, TA, Pearson, SY, Brosnan, JM and Broadhead, A (2000) Assessment of spirit yield in barley breeding lines. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 106, 53–58.Google Scholar
Swanston, JS, Newton, AC, Hoad, SP and Spoor, W (2006) Variation across environments in patterns of water uptake and endosperm modification in barley varieties and variety mixtures. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 86, 826–833.Google Scholar
Therrien, MC, Grant, CA, Carmichael, CA and Noll, JS (1994) Effect of fertilizer management, genotype, and environmental factors on some malting quality characteristics in barley. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 74, 545–547.Google Scholar
Torp, J, Doll, H and Haahr, V (1981) Genotypic and environmental influence upon the nutritional composition of barley grain. Euphytica 30, 719–728.Google Scholar
Triboi, E, Martre, P, Girousse, C, Ravel, C and Triboi-Blondel, A (2006) Unravelling environmental and genetic relationships between grain yield and nitrogen concentration for wheat. European Journal of Agronomy 25, 108–118.Google Scholar
Turkington, TK, O'Donovan, JT, Edney, MJ, Juskiw, E, Mckenzie, RH, Harker, KN, Clayton, GW, Xi, K, Lafond, G, Irvine, RB, Brandt, S, Johnson, EN, May, WE and Smith, E (2012) Effect of crop residue, nitrogen rate and fungicide application on malting barley productivity, quality, and foliar disease severity. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 92, 577–588.Google Scholar
Wade, A and Froment, MA (2003) Barley Quality and Grain Size Homogeneity for Malting: Volume 1: Agronomic Effects on Varieties. (HGCA Project Report No. 320). London, UK: Home Grown Cereals Authority.Google Scholar
Welch, RW and Gosden, AF (1983) Variation in the grain protein content and grain protein yield of barley varieties in UK trials 1976–1980 and its relationship to other factors. Journal of the National Institute of Agricultural Botany 16, 249–255.Google Scholar
Weston, DT, Horsley, R, Schwarz, PB and Goos, RJ (1993) Nitrogen and planting date effects on low-protein spring barley. Agronomy Journal 85, 1170–1174.Google Scholar
Withers, PGA and Dyer, C (1990) The effect of applied nitrogen on the acceptability of spring barley for malting. Aspects of Applied Biology 25, 329–337.Google Scholar
Yu, W, Tan, X, Zou, W, Hu, Z, Fox, GP, Gidley, MJ and Gilbert, RG (2017) Relationships between protein content, starch molecular structure and grain size in barley. Carbohydrate Polymers 155, 271–279.Google Scholar
Zadoks, JC, Chang, TT and Konzak, CF (1974) A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415–421.Google Scholar