Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wjfd9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T14:11:15.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of a compacted subsoil layer on root and shoot growth, water use and nutrient uptake of winter wheat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

P. B. Barraclough  and
A. H. Weir
P. B. Barraclough
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Arable Crops Research, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, AL5 2JQ
A. H. Weir
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Arable Crops Research, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, AL5 2JQ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Avalon winter wheat was grown in 1983 on a light-textured, sandy loam (Cottenham series) which had a subsoil pan with a maximum dry bulk density of 1·8 g/cm3 at 35 cm depth. This was destroyed on part of the site with a ‘Wye Double Digger’ so that crop growth in panned and pan-free soils could be compared. The interaction of the pan with soil water supply was studied by sheltering the crops during May, June and July and either withholding water completely or irrigating weekly back to field capacity.

The pan had a major effect on the vertical extension rate of the root system as monitored both by coring and from observation tubes. Roots were largely confined above the pan until March, but compensatory growth occurred within this soil layer and the total length of root was unaffected. At anthesis, roots had reached a maximum depth of 100 cm in the panned soil compared with 140 cm in the pan-free soil.

Early shoot growth and N content were substantially reduced by the pan because of the inaccessibility of mineral N in the subsoil. However, both the growth of the crop and N uptake recovered following top dressings of N fertilizer and, when water was not limiting, the pan had a negligible effect on grain yield.

Root and shoot growth were reduced by the fixed shelter, but the imposed drought did ot affect water use by the crops until after anthesis when the root systems were already fully developed. Without irrigation, the crop growing on the double-dug soil yielded 5% more than that growing on the panned soil, but there was no evidence for extra water use from the subsoil by the former crop. The best treatment (double-dug with irrigation) outyielded the worst (panned soil with drought) by 8%.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 110 , Issue 2 , April 1988 , pp. 207 - 216
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Barraclough, P. B. (1986). The growth and activity of winter wheat roots in the field: nutrient uptakes of highyielding crops. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 106, 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barraclough, P. B. & Leigh, R. A. (1984). The growth and activity of winter wheat roots in the field: the effect of sowing date and soil type on root growth of highyielding crops. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 103, 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, H. D. (1981). Alleviating mechanical impedance. In Modifying the Root Environment to Reduce Crop Stress (ed. Arkin, G. F. and Taylor, H. M.), pp. 18–57, ASAE monograph no. 4, Michigan, U.S.A.Google Scholar
Bragg, P. L., Govi, B. & Cannell, R. Q. (1983). A comparison of methods, including angled and vertical mini-rhizotrons, for studying root growth and distribution in a spring oat crop. Plant and Soil 73, 435–440.Google Scholar
Catt, J. A., King, D. W. & Weir, A. H. (1975). The soils of Woburn Experimental Farm. I. Great Hill, Road Piece and Butt Close. Rothamsted Experimental Station, Report for 1974, Part 2, pp. 5–28.Google Scholar
Ellis, F. B. & Barnes, B. T. (1980). Growth and development of root systems of winter cereals grown after different tillage methods including direct drilling. Plant and Soil 55, 283–295.Google Scholar
French, B. K. & Legg, B. J. (1979). Rothamsted irrigation 1964–76. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 15–37.Google Scholar
Gregory, P. J., McGowan, M., Biscoe, P. V. & Hunter, B. (1978). Water relations of winter wheat. 1. Growth of the root system. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, A. E. & McEwen, J. (1984). The special value for crop production of reserves of nutrients in the subsoil and the use of special methods of deep placement in raising yields. In Nutrient Balances and Fertilizer Needs in Temperate Agriculture. Proceedings 18th Colloquium International Potash Institute, Gordone-Riviera, Italy, pp. 135–154.Google Scholar
McEwen, J. & Johnston, A. E. (1979). The effects of subsoiling and deep incorporation of P and K fertilizers on the yield and nutrient uptake of barley, potatoes, wheat and sugar beet grown in rotation. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 695–702.Google Scholar
Prew, R. D., Church, B. M., Dewar, A. M., Lacey, J., Magan, N., Penny, A., Plumb, R. T., Thorne, G. N., Todd, A. D. & Williams, T. D. (1985). Some factors limiting the growth and yield of winter wheat and their variation in two seasons. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 104, 135–162.Google Scholar
Taylor, H. M. & Ratliff, L. F. (1969). Root elongation rates of cotton and peanuts as a function of soil strength and soil water content. Soil Science 108, 113–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorne, G. N., Welbank, P. J., Widdowson, F. V., Penny, A., Todd, A. D. & Weir, A. H. (1988). Contrast between sandy and clay soils in the effects of various factors on the growth, nitrogen uptake and yield of winter wheat in three years. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 110, 119–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomar, S. S., Russell, M. B. & Tomar, A. S. (1981). Effect of subsurface compaction on root distribution and growth of wheat. Zeitschrift für Acker- und Pflanzenbau 150, 62–70.Google Scholar
Upchurch, D. R. & Ritchie, J. T. (1983). Root observation using a video recording system in mini-rhizotrons. Agronomy Journal 75, 1009–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vepraskas, M. J. & Miner, G. S. (1986). Effects of subsoiling and mechanical impedance on tobacco root growth. Soil Science Society of America Journal 50, 423–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weir, A. H. & Barraclough, P. B. (1986). The effect of drought on the root growth of winter wheat and on its water uptake from a deep loam. Soil Use and Management 2(3), 91–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welbank, P. J., Gibb, M. J., Taylor, P. J. & Williams, E. D. (1974). Root growth of cereal crops. Rotkamsted Experimental Station, Report for 1973, Part 2, pp. 26–66.Google Scholar
Welbank, P. J., Mullen, L. A., Wood, D. W., Widdowson, F. V., Penny, A., Darby, R. J. & Hewitt, M. V. (1984). Growth and yield of winter wheat on contrasting soils at Woburn. Rothamsted Experimental Station, Report for 1983, pp. 25–27.Google Scholar