Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-s6l46 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T08:41:12.798Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of radiation and nitrogen on number of grains in wheat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

P. E. Abbate ,
F. H. Andrade  and
J. P. Culot
P. E. Abbate
Affiliation:
Unidad lntegrada: Institute National de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bakarcey Universidad National de Mar del Plata, CC 276 (7620) Balcarce, Argentina
F. H. Andrade
Affiliation:
Unidad lntegrada: Institute National de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bakarcey Universidad National de Mar del Plata, CC 276 (7620) Balcarce, Argentina
J. P. Culot
Affiliation:
Unidad lntegrada: Institute National de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bakarcey Universidad National de Mar del Plata, CC 276 (7620) Balcarce, Argentina
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The possible interacting effects of shading and N supply on number of grains of Triticum aestivum L. (cv. Buck Ñandú) were investigated at Balcarce, Argentina, during the 1988/89 and 1989/90 growing seasons. Shading was imposed from c. 13 days before anthesis to 6 days after, and four rates of N fertilization were supplied within each shading treatment around the date of terminal spikelet formation. Water and other nutrients were not limiting.

Total grain yield was strongly correlated with grain number/m2, regardless of shading or N supply. At the highest N rates, grain number and dry weight of spikes at anthesis were linearly related to a photothermal quotient, i.e. the ratio of intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) to mean temperature minus 4·5 °C, during the period from 20 days before anthesis to 10 days after. The response of grain number to the photothermal quotient was interpreted in terms of the supply of assimilates to the spike at anthesis, which determined flower survival. The response of dry weight of spikes to photothermal quotient was interpreted in terms of crop growth rate since there was a linear relationship between crop growth rate and intercepted radiation. The lowest N rates reduced the number of grains/m2, at any given photothermal quotient. Since the reduction in grain number also occurred at any given dry weight of spikes, it cannot be explained by a reduced supply of assimilates to the spikes. Grain number responded directly to the supply of N to the spike, probably through the survival of differentiated flowers. The relationship between spike growth rate and crop growth rate was not affected by N supply. Crop growth rate was reduced by reduced N supply, because less radiation was intercepted and because radiation-use efficiency was lowered. These results indicate that current models for determining yield and number of grains/m2, based on crop growth, are not adequate when N is deficient.

Information

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 124 , Issue 3 , June 1995 , pp. 351 - 360
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Boiffin, J., Caneill, J., Meynard, J. M. & Sebillotte, M. (1981). Elaboration du rendement et fertilisation azotée du blé d'hiver en Champagne crayeuse. I. Protocole et méthode d'étude d'un problème techniques régional. Agronomic 4, 549–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremner, J. & Keeney, D. (1965). Steam distillation methods for determination of ammonium, nitrate and nitrite. Analitica Chimica Acta 32, 485–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooking, I. R. & Kirby, E. J. M. (1981). Interrelationships between stem and ear development in winter wheat: the effects of a Norin 10 dwarfing gene, Gai/Rhl2. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 97, 373–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, R. A. (1975). Yield potential in a dwarf spring wheat and the effect of shading. Crop Science 15, 607–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, R. A. (1984). Growth and yield of wheat. In Proceedings of a Symposium on Potential Productivity of Field Crops under Different Environments, pp. 129–154. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
Fischer, R. A. (1985). Number of kernels in wheat crops and the influence of solar radiation and temperature. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 105, 447–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, R. A. & Stockman, Y. M. (1980). Kernel number per spike in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): responses to preanthesis shading. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 1, 169–180.Google Scholar
Gallagher, J. N. & Biscoe, P. V. (1978). Radiation absorption, growth and yield of cereals. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gifford, R. M., Thorne, J. H., Hitz, W. D. & Giaquinta, R. T. (1984). Crop productivity and photoassimilate partitioning. Science 225, 801–808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenner, C. F. (1979). Grain-filling in wheat plants shaded for brief periods after anthesis. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 6, 629–641.Google Scholar
Midmore, D. J., Cartwright, P. M. & Fischer, R. A. (1984). Wheat in tropical environments. II. Crop growth and grain yield. Field Crops Research 8, 207–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novoa, R. & Loomis, R. S. (1981). Nitrogen and plant production. Plant and Soil 58, 177–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearman, I., Thomas, S. M. & Thorne, G. N. (1977). Effects of nitrogen fertilizer on growth and yield of spring wheat. Annals of Botany 41, 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawson, H. M. & Bagga, A. K. (1979). Influence of temperature between floral initiation and flag leaf emergence on grain number in wheat. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 6, 391–400.Google Scholar
Sinclair, T. R. & Horie, T. (1989). Leaf nitrogen, photosynthesis, and crop radiation use efficiency: a review. Crop Science 29, 90–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiertz, J. H. J. & Van Der Haar, H. (1978). Differences in grain growth, crop photosynthesis and distribution of assimilates between semi-dwarf and a standard cultivar of winter wheat. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 26, 233–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. & Torrie, J. H. (1980). Homogeneidad de coeficientes de regresión. In Bioestadística. Principios y Procedimientos, pp. 412–413. Méjico: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Thorne, G. N. (1974). Physiology of grain yield of wheat and barley. In Report of Rothamsted Experimental Station for 1973, Part 2, pp. 5–25.Google Scholar
Thorne, G. N. & Wood, D. W. (1987). Effects of radiation and temperature on tiller survival, grain number and grain yield in winter wheat. Annals of Botany 59, 413–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, P. C. (1979). An analysis of factors limiting grain number and yield of spring wheat in a low-latitude environment. PhD thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Wardlaw, I. F. (1970). The early stages of grain development in wheat: response to light and temperature in a single variety. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 23, 765–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warrington, I. J., Dunstone, R. L. & Green, L. M. (1977). Temperature effects at three development stages on the yield of the wheat ear. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 28, 11–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whingwiri, E. E. & Stern, W. R. (1982). Floret survival in wheat: significance of the time of floret initiation relative to terminal spikelet formation. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 98, 257–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitfield, D. M. & Smith, C. J. (1989). Effects of irrigation and nitrogen on growth, light interception and efficiency of light conversion in wheat. Field Crops Research 20, 279–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willey, R. W. & Holliday, R. (1971). Plant population, shading and thinning studies in wheat. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 77, 453–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar