Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-zklqj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T19:40:30.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth and light interception in field bean (Vicia faba) infected by Ascochyta fabae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. C. Madeira ,
J. A. Clark  and
S. Rossall
A. C. Madeira
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, Leics LEI2 5RD; UK
J. A. Clark
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, Leics LEI2 5RD; UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effects of inoculation by Ascochyta fabae Speg. on growth and light interception in field bean (Vicia faba L.) were studied. Measurements were made in a field trial using cv. Ticol, a cultivar vulnerable to this disease during early vegetative growth and at the beginning of the flowering stage. Infection reduced leaf area duration, light interception and dry matter yield of energy (light use efficiency) and, consequently, the dry matter production of the crop. Reductions in seed yield ranged from 12 to 30% compared with a prophylactic fungicide treatment.

Information

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 123 , Issue 2 , October 1994 , pp. 225 - 232
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anon. (1976). Manual of Plant Growth Stages and Disease Assessment Keys. London: Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.Google Scholar
Ayres, P. G. (1984). The interaction between environmental stress injury and biotic disease physiology. Annual Review of Phytopathology 22, 53–75.Google Scholar
Biscoe, P. V. & Gallagher, J. N. (1977). Weather, dry matter production and yield. In Environmental Effects on Crop Physiology (Eds Landsberg, J. J. & Cutting, C. V.), pp. 75–100. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Boote, K. J., Jones, J. W., Mishoe, J. W. & Berger, R. D. (1983). Coupling pests to crop growth simulators to predict yield reductions. Phytopathology 73, 1581–1587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradstreet, R. B. (1965). The Kjeldahl Method for Organic Nitrogen. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Brassett, P. R. & Gilligan, C. A. (1989). Fitting of simple models for disease progress data for the take-all fungus. Plant Pathology 38, 397–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, B. B., Hutcheson, S. W., Magyarosy, A. C. & Montalbini, P. (1981). Photosynthesis in healthy and diseased plants. In Effects of Disease on the Physiology of the Growing Plant (Ed. Ayres, P. G.), pp. 13–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carver, T. L. W. & Griffiths, E. (1981). Relationship between powdery mildew infection, green leaf area and grain yield of barley. Annals of Applied Biology 99, 255–266.Google Scholar
Carver, T. L. W. & Griffiths, E. (1982). Effects of barley mildew on green leaf area and grain yield in field and greenhouse experiments. Annals of Applied Biology 101, 561–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, J. H. (1976). The carbon balance of diseased plants: changes in respiration, photosynthesis and translocation. In Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, New Series, Vol. 4, Physiological Plant Pathology (Eds Heitefuss, R. & Williams, P. H.), pp. 450–476. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Deadman, M. L. & Cooke, B. M. (1987). Effects of net blotch on growth and yield of spring barley. Annals of Applied Biology 110, 33–42.Google Scholar
Demetriades-Shah, T. H., Fuchs, M., Kanemasu, E. T. & Flitcroft, I. (1992). A note of caution concerning the relationship between cumulated intercepted solar radiation and crop growth. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 58, 193–207.Google Scholar
Dickinson, C. H. (1973). Interactions of fungicides and leaf saprophytes. Pesticide Science 4, 563–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fasheun, A. & Dennett, M. D. (1982). Interception of radiation and growth efficiency in field beans (Viciafaba L.). Agricultural Meteorology 26, 221–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, J. N. & Biscoe, P. V. (1978). Radiation absorption, growth and yield of cereals. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 47–60.Google Scholar
Green, C. F., Hebblethwaite, P. D. & Ison, D. A. (1985). A quantitative analysis of varietal and moisture status effects on the growth of Vicia faba in relation to radiation absorption. Annals of Applied Biology 106, 143–155.Google Scholar
Griffiths, D. W. & Lawes, D. A. (1978). Variation in the crude protein content of field beans (Vicia faba L.) in relation to the possible improvement of the protein content of the crop. Euphytica 27, 487–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, E. & Amin, S. M. (1977). Effects of Botrytis fabae infection and mechanical defoliation on seed yield of field beans (Vicia faba). Annals of Applied Biology 86, 359–367.Google Scholar
Haverkort, A. J. & Bicamumpaka, M. (1986). Correlation between intercepted radiation and yield of potato crops infected by Phytophthora infestans in Central Africa. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology 92, 239–247.Google Scholar
Hislop, E. C. (1976). Some effects of fungicides and other agrochemicals on the microbiology of the aerial surfaces of plants. In Microbiology of Aerial Plant Surfaces (Eds Dickinson, C. H. & Preece, T. F.), pp. 41–74. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, G. (1988). Models of crop growth. Nature 332, 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishag, H. M. (1973). Physiology of seed yield in field beans. I. Yield and yield components. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 80, 181–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasim, K. & Dennett, M. D. (1986). Effects of shading and plant density on leaf growth of Vicia faba. Annals of Applied Biology 109, 627–638.Google Scholar
Lieth, H. (1975). Measurement of calorific values. In Primary Productivity of the Biosphere (Eds Lieth, H. & Whittaker, R. H.), pp. 119–129. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Madden, L. V. (1983). Measuring and modelling crop losses at the field level. Phytopathology 73, 1591–1596.Google Scholar
Madeira, A. C. (1988). Growth, light interception and disease in field bean. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Madeira, A. C. & Clark, J. A. (1992). Reduction of efficiency of light use due to disease. Anais do Instituto Superior de Agronomia (Lisboa, Portugal), vol. XLIII.Google Scholar
Madeira, A. C. & Clark, J. A. (1994). The effects of disease on resource capture. In Resource Capture by Crops, Proceedings of the 52nd Nottingham Easter School in Agricultural Science (Eds Monteith, J. L., Scott, R. K. & Unsworth, M. H.), pp. 167–188. Nottingham: University of Nottingham Press.Google Scholar
Madeira, A. C, Clark, J. A. & Rossall, S. (1988). Growth, light interception and disease in field bean (Vicia faba): the effect of late infection by Ascochyta fabae. Annals of Applied Biology 112, 585–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madeira, A. C, Clark, J. A., Rossall, S. & McArthur, A. J. (1992). A classification system for seeds of faba bean infected by Ascochyta fabae. FABIS Newsletter 30, 48–51.Google Scholar
Monteith, J. L. (1977). Climate and efficiency of crop production in Britain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 281, 277–294.Google Scholar
Monteith, J. L. (1978). Reassessment of maximum growth rates for C3 and C4 crops. Experimental Agriculture 14, 1–5.Google Scholar
Monteith, J. L. & Unsworth, M. H. (1990). Principles of Environmental Physics. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Russell, G., Jarvis, P. G. & Monteith, J. L. (1989). Absorption of radiation by canopies and stand growth. In Plant Canopies: Their Growth, Form and Function (Eds Russell, G., Marshall, B. & Jarvis, P. G.), pp. 21–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, R. K. & Jaggard, K. W. (1985). The effect of pests and diseases on growth and yield of sugar beet. In Proceedings of the 48th Winter Congress of the IIRB, pp. 153–169. Brussels: IIRB.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. (1983). Changes in the partitioning of assimilate of Vicia faba in response to environment. In Temperate Legumes: Physiology, Genetics and Nodulation (Eds Jones, D. G. & Davies, D. R.), pp. 175–190. London: Pitman Books.Google Scholar
Van der Planck, J. E. (1963). Plant Diseases: Epidemics and Control. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Waggoner, P. E. & Berger, P. D. (1987). Defoliation, disease and growth. Phytopathology 77, 393–398.Google Scholar
Whipps, J. M. & Lewis, D. H. (1981). Patterns of translocation, storage and interconversion of carbohydrates. In Effects of Disease on the Physiology of the Growing Plant (Ed. Ayres, P. G.), pp. 47–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, P. F. (1975). Growth of broad beans infected by Botrytis fabae. Journal of Horticultural Science 50, 415–424.Google Scholar