Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:56:47.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Histochemical studies on bovine sweat glands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

S. H. Yang
S. H. Yang
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Histochemical tests have been applied to the socalled sweat glands and their secretions of Zebu and Ayrshire cattle, the former to only a limited extent.

2. For skin specimens of Ayrshire cattle positive reactions were obtained for ribonucleoprotein, arginine and alkaline phosphatase. Negative reactions were obtained for desoxyribonucleoprotein and acid glycerophosphatase.

3. Neither the sweat glands of Ayrshire cattle nor those of Zebu cattle gave positive reactions for fats, lipids or cholesterol and its esters, although these were all present in the sebaceous glands of both breeds. Detectable amounts of phospholipid were not found in the sweat glands of the Ayrshire cattle and their secretions.

4. The chemical composition of the secretion of bovine sweat glands differs markedly from that of human eccrine or apocrine sweat glands in not containing detectable amounts of glycogen, lipids and associated compounds or iron.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 42 , Issue 1-2 , January 1952 , pp. 155 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baker, J. (1946). Quart. J. Micr. Sci. 87, 441.Google Scholar
Baker, J. (1947 a). Quart. J. Micr. Sci. 88, 115.Google Scholar
Baker, J. (1947 b). Quart. J. Micr. Sci. 88, 463.Google Scholar
Bunting, H., Wislocki, G. B. & Dempsey, E. W. (1948). Anat. Rec. 100, 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowdry, E. V. (1943). Microscopic Technique in Biology and Medicine. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
Dempsey, M. (1946). Nature, Lond., 157, 513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellenberger, W. (1906). Handbuch d. vergleichende mikroskopischen Anatomie d. Haustiere, 1, 125. Berlin: Parey.Google Scholar
Findlay, J. D. & Yang, S. H. (1948). Nature, Lond., 161, 1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Findlay, J. D. & Yang, S. H. (1950). J. Agric. Sci. 40, 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glick, D. (1949). Techniques of Histo- and Cyto-Chemistry. New York: Intersoience Publ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomori, G. (1939). Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol., N.Y., 42, 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomori, G. (1941). Arch. Path. 32, 189.Google Scholar
Gomori, G. (1949). Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol., N.Y., 70, 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodall, A. M. & Yang, S. H. (1952). J. Agric. Sci. 42, 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurlt, (1835). Vergleichenden Untersuchungen uber die Haut des Mensohen und d. Haussaugetiere, besonders in Beziehung auf die Absonderungsorgane des Hauttalges und des Schweisses, Berlin (cited by Yamane & Ono (1936)).Google Scholar
Harris, T. N. & Harris, S. (1948). Proc. Soc. Exp.Biol., N.Y., 69, 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lison, L. (1936). Histochemie animale. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar
Trautmann, A. & Fiebiger, J. (1949). Lehrbuch d. Histologie und vergleichenden mikroskopischen Anatomie der Haustiere. 8th ed.Berlin: Parey.Google Scholar
Yamane, J. & Ono, Y. (1936). Mem. Fac. Sci. Agric. Taihoku, 19, 3.Google Scholar