Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:49:26.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Incomplete determination of a measure of quality in a series of experiments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. J. Finney
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen and A.R.C. Unit of Statistics
Ø. Nissen
Affiliation:
Norges Landbrukshøgskoles Åkervekstforsøk

Extract

Often the ultimate measure of performance in a field experiment is the product of a gross weight and a factor relating to quality, as when yield of dry matter is determined from gross yield and percentage dry matter. Since the factor is usually much less variable than the gross yield, yet relatively troublesome and expensive to determine, the practice of making independent estimates of it in every experiment involves diversion of an appreciable part of the total expenditure to a measurement whose inaccuracy will affect only slightly the final experimental error.

Proposals are made for determining the quality factor on only a fraction of all the experiments of one series and applying the averages to the gross yields of others in the same series; formulae and tables relating to the most economic ratio of incompletely to completely recorded experiments are presented.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCE

Wishart, J. & Sanders, H. G. (1955). Principles and Practice of Field Experimentation, 2nd ed.Cambridge: Commonwealth Bureau of Plant Breeding and Genetics, p. 120.Google Scholar