Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T03:14:49.582Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inheritance of leaf and stem resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in a cross between Brassica incana and Brassica oleracea var. alboglabra

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2013

J. O. DISI ,
J. MEI ,
D. WEI ,
Y. DING  and
W. QIAN
J. O. DISI
Affiliation:
College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400716, People's Republic of China Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA
J. MEI
Affiliation:
College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400716, People's Republic of China
D. WEI
Affiliation:
College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400716, People's Republic of China
Y. DING
Affiliation:
College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400716, People's Republic of China
W. QIAN*
Affiliation:
College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400716, People's Republic of China
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: qianwei666@hotmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Deploying resistant cultivars can reduce the prohibitive cost associated with managing Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in rapeseed production worldwide. The present paper reports the results of an analysis of inheritance of leaf and stem resistance involving a single inter-specific cross between Brassica incana and Brassica oleracea var. alboglabra. Detached leaves and stems of parental lines, F1, F2 and the backcrosses were obtained from Southwest University, Chongqing Field Station, Chongqing China in the 2009/10 and 2010/11 field seasons and inoculated with S. sclerotiorum to determine resistance. Significant differences were detected across the two growing seasons between parents and some of the progeny for measures of both leaf and stem resistance. Continuous variation patterns among the segregating generations suggest the quantitative nature of resistance in both leaf and stem. Dominant and additive × additive epistatic interactions controlled the genetic effects for both traits. Broad- and narrow-sense heritability estimates were moderately high for leaf resistance, but were intermediate to high for stem resistance in the two field seasons. Low estimates of the minimum number of genes for leaf and stem resistance were recorded in the two field seasons. The results indicate that selection gains and the identification of quantitative trait loci can be maximized in marker-assisted-selection through differential selection (tissue-based selection) on a replicated plot basis.

Type
Crops and Soils Research Papers
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 152 , Issue 1 , February 2014 , pp. 146 - 152
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allard, R. W. (1960). Principles of Plant Breeding. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Bardin, S. D. & Huang, H. C. (2001). Research on biology and control of Sclerotinia diseases in Canada. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 23, 88–98.Google Scholar
Baswana, K. S., Rastogi, K. B. & Sharma, P. P. (1991). Inheritance of stalk rot resistance in cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. Botrytis L.). Euphytica 57, 93–96.Google Scholar
Bernardo, R. (2008). Molecular markers and selection for complex traits in plants: learning from the last 20 years. Crop Science 48, 1649–1664.Google Scholar
Boland, G. J. (1997). Stability analysis for evaluating the influence of environment on chemical and biological control of white mold (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum) of bean. Biological Control 9, 7–14.Google Scholar
Boland, G. J. & Hall, R. (1994). Index of plant hosts of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 16, 93–108.Google Scholar
Bolton, M. D., Thomma, B. P. H. J. & Nelson, B. D. (2006). Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary: biology and molecular traits of a cosmopolitan pathogen. Molecular Plant Pathology 7, 1–16.Google Scholar
Brimner, T. A. & Boland, G. J. (2003). A review of the non-target effects of fungi used to biologically control plant diseases. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 100, 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnham, K. D., Dorrance, A. E., VanToai, T. T. & St. Martin, S. K. (2003). Quantitative trait loci for partial resistance to Phytophthora sojae in soybean. Crop Science 43, 1610–1617.Google Scholar
Cavalli, L. L. (1952). An analysis of linkage in quantitative inheritance. In Quantitative Inheritance (Eds Reeve, E. C. R. & Waddington, C. H.), pp. 135–144. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
del Río, L. E., Bradley, C. A., Henson, R. A., Endres, G. J., Hanson, B. K., McKay, K., Halvorson, M., Porter, P. M., Le Gare, D. G. & Lamey, H. A. (2007). Impact of Sclerotinia stem rot on yield of canola. Plant Disease 91, 191–194.Google Scholar
Dudley, J. W. & Moll, R. H. (1969). Interpretation and use of estimates of heritability and genetic variances in plant breeding. Crop Science 9, 257–262.Google Scholar
Fuller, P. A., Coyne, D. P. & Steadman, J. R. (1984). Inheritance of resistance to white mold disease in a diallel cross of dry beans. Crop Science 24, 929–933.Google Scholar
Gossen, B. D., Rimmer, S. R. & Holley, J. D. (2001). First report of resistance to benomyl fungicide in Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Plant Disease 85, 1206.Google Scholar
Hao, J. J., Yu, S. X., Dong, Z. D., Fan, S. L., Ma, Q. X., Song, M. Z. & Yu, J. W. (2008). Quantitative inheritance of leaf morphological traits in upland cotton. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 146, 561–569.Google Scholar
He, Y. H., Yang, R. F. & Luo, S. Q. (1987). Development and study of new rapeseed variety Zhongyou 821 with high yield and disease resistance (tolerance). Oil Crops of China 2, 11–15.Google Scholar
Hind-Lanoiselet, T. L., Lanoiselet, V. M., Lewington, F. K., Ash, G. J. & Murray, G. M. (2005). Survival of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum under fire. Australasian Plant Pathology 34, 311–317.Google Scholar
Kim, H. S. & Diers, B. W. (2000). Inheritance of partial resistance to Sclerotinia stem rot in soybean. Crop Science 40, 55–61.Google Scholar
Lande, R. (1981). The minimum number of genes contributing to quantitative variations between and within populations. Genetics 99, 541–553.Google Scholar
Li, R., Rimmer, R., Buchwaldt, L., Sharpe, A. G., Seguin-Swartz, G., Coutu, C. & Hegedus, D. D. (2004). Interaction of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum with a resistant Brassica napus cultivar: expressed Sequence Tag Analysis identifies genes associated with fungal pathogenesis. Fungal Genetics and Biology 41, 735–753.Google Scholar
Mather, K. & Jinks, J. L. (1982). Biometrical Genetics, 3rd edn. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Mei, J., Qian, L., Disi, J. O., Yang, X., Li, Q., Li, J., Frauen, M., Cai, D. & Qian, W. (2011). Identification of resistant sources against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in Brassica species with emphasis on B. oleracea. Euphytica 177, 393–399.Google Scholar
Ng, T. J. (1990). Generation means analysis by microcomputer. Hortscience 25, 363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyquist, W. E. & Baker, R. J. (1991). Estimation of heritability and prediction of selection response in plant populations. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 10, 235–322.Google Scholar
Oil Crop Research institute, C.A.o.A.S. (1975). Sclerotinia Disease of Oilseed Crops. Beijing: Agriculture Press.Google Scholar
Purdy, L. H. (1979). Sclerotinia sclerotiorum: history, diseases and symptomatology, host range, geographic distribution, and impact. Phytopathology 69, 875–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, H. F., Comstock, R. E. & Harvey, P. H. (1955). Genetic variances in open pollinated of corn. Genetics 40, 45–60.Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. (2009). JMP® 8: Statistics and Graphics Guide. Cary, NC, USA: SAS.Google Scholar
van Maanen, A. & Xu, X.–M. (2003). Modelling plant disease epidemics. European Journal of Plant Pathology 109, 669–682.Google Scholar
Wang, H. Z., Liu, G. H., Zheng, Y. B., Wang, X. F. & Yang, Q. (2004). Breeding of the Brassica napus cultivar Zhongshuang 9 with high-resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and dynamics of its important defense enzyme activity. Scientia Agricultura Sinica 37, 23–28.Google Scholar
Warner, J. N. (1952). A method for estimating heritability. Agronomy Journal 44, 427–430.Google Scholar
Yin, X., Yi, B., Chen, W., Zhang, W., Tu, J., Fernando, W. G. D. & Fu, T. (2010). Mapping of QTLs detected in a Brassica napus DH population for resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in multiple environments. Euphytica 173, 25–35.Google Scholar
Zalapa, J. E., Staub, J. E. & McCreight, J. D. (2006). Generation means analysis of plant architectural traits and fruit yield in melon. Plant Breeding 125, 482–487.Google Scholar
Zhao, J. & Meng, J. (2003). Genetic analysis of loci associated with partial resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 106, 759–764.Google Scholar
Zhao, J., Peltier, A. J., Meng, J., Osborn, T. C. & Grau, C. R. (2004). Evaluation of Sclerotinia stem rot resistance in oilseed Brassica napus using a petiole inoculation technique under greenhouse conditions. Plant Disease 88, 1033–1039.Google Scholar
Zhao, J., Udall, J. A., Quijada, P. A., Grau, C. R., Meng, J. & Osborn, T. C. (2006). Quantitative trait loci for resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and its association with a homeologus non-reciprocal transposition in Brassica napus L. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 112, 509–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, J., Buchwaldt, L., Rimmer, S. R., Sharpe, A., McGregor, L., Bekkaoui, D. & Hegedus, D. (2009). Patterns of differential gene expression in Brassica napus cultivars infected with Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Molecular Plant Pathology 10, 635–49.Google Scholar