Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-fz5kh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T10:47:15.353Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The performance of heifers got by artificial insemination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Alan Robertson  and
J. M. Rendel
Alan Robertson
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, Edinburgh
J. M. Rendel
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, Edinburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. An analysis has been made of the production records of over 1400 heifers got by A.I. bulls at five non-Board centres. The A.I. heifers, when compared with other heifers in the same herd in the same year, showed no significant increase in yield but a significant increase in fat content.

2. The difference in yield between A.I. and contemporary non A.I. heifers was not significantly different in herds at all levels of production. This would suggest that only a small proportion of the differences in yield between the herds in the sample was genetic in origin. In fat percentage, there was some evidence, though not very conclusive, that rather more of the inter-herd variation was genetic.

3. Significant differences were found between the progeny groups by different sires in both milk yield and fat content. The standard deviation of the variation due to the breeding value of the sire was 37 gal. and 0·13% fat respectively.

4. Methods of interpreting progeny tests made under A.I. conditions are discussed theoretically. It is concluded that the comparison with heifer contemporaries in the same herd is most satisfactory for milk yield and the simple average is best for fat content.

5. The relevance of these results to the genetic structure of breeds is discussed. They are in good agreement with the conclusions from pedigree analysis that the genetic differences between the dominant group of herds and the mass of commercial cattle in each breed is not great.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , April 1954 , pp. 184 - 192
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Johansson, I. & Robertson, A. (1952). Proc. Brit. Soc. Anim. Prod. 79.Google Scholar
New Zealand Dairy Board, Annual Report (1951, 1952).Google Scholar
Perry, E. J. (1949). Proc. 12th Int. Dairy Congr. 1, 639.Google Scholar
Robertson, A. & Asker, A. A. (1951). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 19, 113.Google Scholar
Wiener, G. (1953). J. Agric. Sci. 43, 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar