Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-jtdwj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T21:59:18.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Potassium in soils under different cropping systems: 3. Non-exchangeable potassium in soils from long-term experiments at Rothamsted and Woburn

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

T. M. Addiscott  and
A. E. Johnston
T. M. Addiscott
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts.
A. E. Johnston
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Soils from long-term experiments at Rothamsted and Woburn were cropped for very long periods (up to 5½ years) with ryegrass in pots. Measurements of the potassium taken up by the ryegrass that was not exchangeable to ammonium acetate and the kinetics of its release both suggested two categories of non-exchangeable K. Of these, the first to be released was closely related to the initial exchangeable K, whilst the second, though partly related to the initial exchangeable K was also influenced by the clay percentage. Release of both categories may have been controlled by diffusion, because both showed good relationships between the quantity released and time. It is suggested that the first category may be K ‘trapped’ when K fertilizer added in the field decreased the interlamellar spaces of vermiculite layers in clay particles, whilst the second may simply be the ‘native’ K (described by others) present in clay and other minerals in the soil.

Resowing the soils (without drying them) during the later stages of K. uptake suggested that the ability of the old ryegrass to absorb K was not a factor limiting K uptake even after long growth.

When the ryegrass ceased to grow, the mean K potentials in the exhausted soils were close to the ‘uptake potential’ for ryegrass derived earlier by considering K uptakes from soils in relation to the quantity/potential relationships of the soils. Drying and rewetting the exhausted soils released K; the amount was influenced in one group of soils by the exchangeable K in the moist exhausted soil and in another group by the clay percentage.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 84 , Issue 3 , June 1975 , pp. 513 - 524
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Addiscott, T. M. (1970). The uptake of initially available soil potassium by ryegrass. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 74, 123–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Addiscott, T.M. & Mitchbll, J.D.D. (1970). Potassium uptake by potatoes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 74, 495–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Addiscott, T. M. & Talibudeen, O. (1969). The buffering capacity of potassium reserves in soils. Potash Review, Subject 4, 45th Suite, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Arnold, P. W. & Close, B. M. (1961 a). Release of nonexchangeable potassium from some British soils cropped in the glasshouse. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 57, 295–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, P. W. & Close, B. M. (1961 b). Potassiumreleasing power of soils from the Agdell rotation experiment assessed by glasshouse cropping. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 57, 381–6.Google Scholar
Avery, B. W., Bullock, P., Catt, J. A., Newman, A. C. D., Rayner, J. H. & Weir, A. H. (1972). The soil of Barnfield. Report of Rothamsted Experimental Station for 1971, Part 2, pp. 5–37.Google Scholar
Barshad, I. (1954). Cation exchange in micaceous minerals. I. Replaceability of the interlayer cations of vermiculite with ammonium and potassium ions. Soil Science 77, 463–78.Google Scholar
Brown, G. & Dunwoody, J. H. A. (1966). Prediction of release of non-exchangeable potassium to crops. Report of Rothamsted Experimental Station for 1965, p. 72.Google Scholar
Chute, J. H. & Quirk, J. P. (1967). Diffusion of potassium from mica-like clay minerals. Nature, London 213, 1156–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crank, J. (1956). The Mathematics of Diffusion. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
De Turk, E. E., Wood, L. K. & Bray, R. H. (1943). Potash fixation in corn-belt soils. Soil Science 55, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haylock, O. F. (1956). A method for investigating the availability of non-exchangeable potassium. Proceedings of the 6th International Congress of Soil Science, B, 403–8.Google Scholar
Johnston, A. E. (1971). Potassium residues in soils from experiments at Rothamsted and Woburn. In Residual Values of Applied Nutrients. Technical Bulletin, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food no. 20, pp. 220–36.Google Scholar
Johnston, A. E. & Addiscott, T. M. (1971). Potassium in soils under different cropping systems. 1. Behaviour of K remaining in soils from classical and rotation experiments at Rothamsted and Woburn and evaluation of methods of measuring soil potassium. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 76, 539–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, A. E. & Garner, H. V. (1969). The Broadbalk wheat experiment: historical introduction. Report of Rothamsted Experimental Station for 1968, Part 2, pp. 12–25.Google Scholar
Johnston, A. E. & Mitchell, J. D. D. (1974). The behaviour of K remaining in soils from the Agdell experiment at Rothamsted, the results of intensive cropping in pot experiments and their relation to soil analysis and the results of field experiments. Report of Rothamsted Experimental Station for 1973, Part 2, pp. 74–97.Google Scholar
Johnston, A. E. & Wedderburn, R. W. M. (1975). The Woburn Market Garden experiment, 1942—69. I. A history of the experiment, details of treatments and the yields of crops. Report of Rothamsted Experimental Station for 1974, Part 2. (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Matthews, B. C. & Sherrell, C. G. (1960). Effect of drying on exchangeable potassium of Ontario soils and the relation of exchangeable- potassium to crop yield. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 40, 35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, P. & Coulter, J. K. (1964). The potassium status of West Indian volcanic soils. Journal of Soil Science 15, 284–98.Google Scholar
Quirk, J. P. & Chute, J. H. (1968). Potassium release from mica-like clay minerals. Proceedings of the 9th International Congress of Soil Science, Adelaide, 2, 671–81.Google Scholar
Rausell-Colom, J. A., Sweatman, T. R., Wells, C. B. & Norrish, K. (1965). Experimental Pedology (ed. E. G. Hallsworth and D. V. Crawford), pp. 40–72. Butterworths.Google Scholar
Rich, C. I. (1972). Potassium in soil minerals. Proceedings of the 9th Colloquium, International Potash Institute, Landshut, pp. 15–31.Google Scholar
Rothamsted Experimental Station (1970). Details of the Classical and long-term experiments up to 1967. 128 pp. Harpenden.Google Scholar
Talibudeen, O. & Dey, S. K. (1968). Potassium reserves in British soils. I. The Rothamsted Classical Experiments. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 71, 95–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, R. G. & Johnston, A. E. (1962 a). Barnfield. Report of Rothamsted Experimental Station for 1961, pp. 227–47.Google Scholar
Warren, R. G. & Johnston, A. E. (1962 b). The accumulation and loss of soil potassium in long term experiments at Rothamsted and Woburn. Proceedings of the Fertilizer Society 72, 1–24.Google Scholar
Warren, R. G. & Johnston, A. E. (1967). Hoosfield Continuous Barley. Report of Rothamsted Experimental Station for 1966, pp. 320–38.Google Scholar
Weir, A. H., Catt, J. A. & Ormerod, E. C. (1969). The mineralogy of Broadbalk soils. Report of Rothamsted Experimental Station for 1968, Part 2, pp. 81–9.Google Scholar