Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:49:20.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The production of ketonaemia and pregnancy toxaemia in ewes through manipulation of the feeding level

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. C. Gill
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeenshire
W. Thomson
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeenshire
G. T. Park
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeenshire

Extract

1. Trials over 2 years involving 120 Half bred ewes were conducted in outdoor paddocks with controlled feeding. A study was made of the effect of varying the level of feeding during pregnancy on production of ketonaemia and pregnancy toxaemia.

2. Blood ketone levels were low and pregnancy toxaemia absent in ewes gaining weight during the latter part of gestation, but ewes failing to gain weight over the same period were subject to ketonaemia and pregnancy toxaemia. A reduction in the ration of fat ewes for a 3-week period, imposed more than 5 weeks before lambing, had no detrimental effect.

3. A significant correlation was found between loss in weight and highest ketone figure in the highthroughout and the high-checked groups in 1952 and in the high-checked-high group in 1953.

4. High ketonaemia was not always indicative of pregnancy toxaemia, since of the twenty-nine ewes which had, on one or more occasions, over 20 mg. β-hydroxybutyric acid per 100 ml. blood, seven showed signs of pregnancy toxaemia and twentytwo did not.

5. In the cases reported, the time of appearance of the first symptoms of pregnancy toxaemia was around 14 days from the estimated lambing date, and affected ewes tended to lamb before term.

6. On a comparatively low level of nutrition, only one case of pregnancy toxaemia occurred, though some animals had marked ketosis. In well conditioned ewes reduced to a similar level during the critical period, there was a high incidence of pregnancy toxaemia, and in most of these cases a high degree of ketosis.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bourne, R. F. (1950). N. Amer. Vet. 31, 157.Google Scholar
Elder, C. & Uren, A. W. (1940). Res. Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 412.Google Scholar
Fraser, A. H. H., Godden, W., Snook, L. C. & Thomson, W. (1938). J. Physiol. 94, 346.Google Scholar
Fraser, A. H. H., Godden, W., Snook, L. C. & Thomson, W. (1939). J. Physiol. 97, 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, L. A. & Lester, D. (1944). J. biol. Chem. 154, 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groenewald, J. W., Graf, H., Bekker, P. M., Malan, J. R. & Clark, R. (1941). Onderstepoort J. Vet. Sci. 17, 225.Google Scholar
Kendall, M. G. (1948). Advanced Theory of Statistics, vol. II, p. 205. London.Google Scholar
Quenouille, M. H. (1950). Introductory Statistics, p. 176. London.Google Scholar
Roderick, L. M., Harshfield, G. S. & Hawn, M. C. (1937). J. Amer. Vet. Med. Ass. 90, 41.Google Scholar
Sampson, J. & Boley, L. E. (1940). Cornell Vet. 30, 392.Google Scholar
Sampson, J. & Hayden, C. E. (1935). J. Amer. Vet. Med. Ass. 86, 13.Google Scholar
Somogyi, M. (1945). J. biol. Chem. 160, 71.Google Scholar