Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:18:51.618Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some field instruments suitable for the automated measurement of thermal and hydraulic properties of soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

P. F. North  and
N. J. Brown
P. F. North
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts, AL5 2JQ
N. J. Brown
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts, AL5 2JQ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Three types of field instrument are described that are suitable for the automated and replicated in situ measurement of the soil properties: temperature, thermal conductivity and water pressure. Novel aspects of their design and construction are discussed, as are details of their installation and precautions necessary for successful use in the field. The principle of operation of each type of instrument is described and the method of controlling several instruments of the same type via a computer-based data acquisition system is indicated. Their accuracy and performance under field conditions are shown to be very adequate. Determination errors are approximately 0·1 K in the range 0–35 °C for temperature, 6–8% for thermal conductivity, and 1 mm water for water pressure, with a time constant of about 2 sec in a silty clay loam soil; reliability is measured as two sensor failures out of 236 over an operating period of several months. Examples are given of data collected during their deployment in an experiment to determine the physical effects of tillage on soil.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 101 , Issue 2 , October 1983 , pp. 411 - 422
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, F. G., Veneman, P. L. M. & Bouma, J. (1974). Limitations of the instantaneous profile method, for field measurement of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 38, 885–888.Google Scholar
Blackwell, P. S. & Elsworth, M. J. (1980). A system for automatically measuring and recording soil water potential and rainfall. Agricultural Water Management 3, 135–141.Google Scholar
Boels, D., van Gils, J. B. H. M., Veerman, G. J. & Wit, K. E. (1978). Theory and system of automatic determination of soil moisture characteristics and unsaturated hydraulic conductivities. Soil Science 126, 191–199.Google Scholar
de Vries, D. A. (1952). A non-stationary method for determining thermal conductivity of a soil in situ. Soil Science 73, 83–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, D. A. (1963). Thermal properties of soils. In Physics of Plant Environment (ed. van Wijk, W. R.), pp. 210–235. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co.Google Scholar
de Vries, D. A. & Peck, A. J. (1958). On the cylindrical probe method of measuring thermal conductivity with special reference to soils. I. Extension of theory and discussion of probe characteristics. Australian Journal of Physics 11, 255–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritton, D. D., Busscher, W. J. & Alpert, J. E. (1974). An inexpensive but durable thermal conductivity probe for field use. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 38, 854–855.Google Scholar
Hadas, A. (1977). Evaluation of theoretically predicted thermal conductivities of soils under field and laboratory conditions. Soil Science Society of America Journal 41, 460–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jury, W. A. & Bellantuoni, B. (1976 a). Heat and water movement under surface rocks in a field soil. I. Thermal effects. Soil Science Society of America Journal 40, 505–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jury, W. A. & Bellantuoni, B. (1976 b). Background temperature correction for thermal conductivity probes. Soil Science Society of America Journal 40, 608–610.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries And Food (1982). Techniques for meaauring soil physical properties. Reference Book 441. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Moench, A. F. & Evans, D. D. (1970). Thermal conductivity and diffusivity of soil using a cylindrical heat source. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 34, 377–381.Google Scholar
Monteith, J. L. (1972). Survey of Instruments for Micrometeorology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nagpal, N. K. & Boersma, L. (1973). Air entrapment as a possible source of error in the use of a cylindrical heat probe. Sail Science Society of America Proceedings 37, 828–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, P. F. (1983). A computer-based system for the acquisition and analysis of data from a field tillage study. Computers and Geosciences 9 (2), 229–234.Google Scholar
Reid, R. C., Prausnitz, J. M. & Sherwood, T. K. (1977). The Properties of Oases and Liquids. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Rice, R. (1969). A fast-response field tensiometer system. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineera 12, 48–50.Google Scholar
Sepaskhah, A. R. & Boersma, L. (1979). Thermal conductivity of soils as a function of temperature and water content. Soil Science Society of America Journal 43, 439–444.Google Scholar
Towner, G. D. (1980). Theory of time response of tensiometers. Journal of Soil Science 31, 607–621.Google Scholar
van Duin, R. H. A. & de Vries, D. A. (1954). A recording apparatus for measuring thermal conductivity, and some results obtained with it in soil. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 2, 168–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, K. K. & Jackson, R. D. (1967). Temperature effects in a tensiometer-pressure transducer system. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 31, 156–160.Google Scholar
Wechsler, A. E., Glaser, P. E. & McConnell, R. K. (1965). Methods of laboratory and field measurements of thermal conductivity of soils. U. S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory Special Report 82, 31 pp.Google Scholar
Wierenga, P. J., Nielsen, D. R. & Hagan, R. M. (1969). Thermal properties of a soil based upon field and laboratory measurements. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 33, 354–360.Google Scholar
Williams, T. H. L. (1978). An automatic scanning and recording tensiometer system. Journal of Hydrology 39, 175–183.Google Scholar
Woodside, W. & Messmer, J. H. (1961). Thermal conductivity of porous media: I. Unconsolidated sands. Journal of Applied Physics 32, 1688–1699.Google Scholar