Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-m2b9p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T14:04:38.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Utilization of urea by sheep

I. Rates of breakdown of urea and carbohydrates in vivo and in vitro

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. M. Schwartz ,
C. A. Schoeman  and
M. S. Färber
H. M. Schwartz
Affiliation:
National Chemical Research Laboratory, South African Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Pretoria
C. A. Schoeman
Affiliation:
National Chemical Research Laboratory, South African Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Pretoria
M. S. Färber
Affiliation:
Veterinary Research Institute, Onderstepoort
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1.The breakdown of urea, soluble starch and glucose was followed in the rumen of fistulatedsheep and in artificial rumens containing rumen ingesta or strained rumen fluid.

2. Carbohydrate remained in the rumen two to three times as long when starch was dosed in vivo as when glucose was given.

3. The relative rates of breakdown of urea and carbohydrate by strained rumen fluid in vitro differed markedly from those in vivo. This was due to the fact that straining removed large numbers of starch- and glucose-utilizing micro-organisms which were attached to the larger food particles, while the concentration of the urea-splitting organisms which were freely suspended in the strained liquor was apparently the same as that obtained in the strained material. Strained rumen fluid should therefore not be used for studies of the utilization of urea in vitro.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 63 , Issue 3 , November 1964 , pp. 289 - 296
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Altona, R. E., Rose, C. J. & Tilley, T. J. (1960). S. Afr. J. Agric. Soi. 3, 69.Google Scholar
Arias, C, Burroughs, W., Gerlaugh, P. & Bethke, R. M. (1951). J. Anim. Sci. 10, 683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, F. (1943). Ann. Appl. Biol. 30, 230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belasco, I. J. (1956). J. Anim. Sci. 15, 496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, M. P. & Robinson, I. M. (1962). J. Bact. 84, 605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, M. P. & Robinson, I. M. (1963). J. Dairy Sci. 46, 150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R. & Quin, J. I. (1951). Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res. 25, 93.Google Scholar
Coombe, J. B. (1959). J. Aust. Inst. Agric Sci. 25, 299.Google Scholar
Coombe, J. B. & Tribe, D. E. (1962). J. Agric. Sci. 58, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, R. J. & Mccarthy, R. D. (1957). Maryland Agric. Exp. Sta. Misc. Publ., no. 291, 4. Quoted in Barnett, A. J. G. & Reid, R. L. (1961). Reactions in the Rumen, p. 113. London: Edward Arnold Ltd.Google Scholar
Gilchrist, F. M. C. & Kistner, A. (1962). J. Agric. Sci. 59, 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hungate, R. E. (1950). Bad. Rev. 14, 1.Google Scholar
Kerr, R. W. & Trubell, O. R. (1943). Paper Trade J. 117 (15), 25.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (1955). Brit. J. Nutr. 9, 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loosli, J. K. (1958). In Processed Plant Protein Foodstuffs, p. 291. Ed. Atlschul, A.M., New York: Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
Mcdonald, I. W. (1948). Biochem. J. 42, 584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcdonald, I. W. (1952). Biochem. J. 51, 86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcnaught, M. L. (1951). Biochem. J. 49, 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcnaught, M. L. & Smith, J. A. B. (1947–1948). Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 17, 18.Google Scholar
Mills, R. C, Booth, A. N., Bohstedt, G. & Hart, E. B. (1942). J. Dairy Sci. 25, 925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, R. C, Lardinois, C. C, Rupel, I. W. & Hart, E. B. (1944). J. Dairy Sci. 27, 571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, R. M. & Smith, J. A. B. (1943a). Biochem. J. 37, 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, R. M. & Smith, J. A. B. (1943b). Biochem. J. 37, 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, J. T. (1953). J. Dairy Sci. 36, 955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, H. M., Schoeman, C. A. & Färber, M. S. (1963). Proceedings 1963 Central African Scientific and Medical Congress (in the Press).Google Scholar
Smith, J. A. B. & Baker, F. (1944). Biochem. J. 38, 496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. H. (1959). J. Agric. Sci. 52, 72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somogyi, M. (1952). J. Biol. Chem. 195, 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, A. C. I. (1956). J. Gen. Microbiol. 14, 733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, A. C. I. (1962). J. Gen. Microbiol. 28, 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar