Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:58:34.980Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

WAASB index revealed stable resistance sources for soybean anthracnose in India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2022

L. S. Rajput ,
V. Nataraj Open the ORCID record for V. Nataraj [Opens in a new window] ,
S. Kumar ,
P. K. Amrate ,
S. Jahagirdar ,
S. N. Huilgol ,
P. Chakruno ,
A. Singh ,
S. Maranna  and
M. B. Ratnaparkhe
...Show all authors
L. S. Rajput
Affiliation:
ICAR-Indian Institute of Soybean Research, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
V. Nataraj*
Affiliation:
ICAR-Indian Institute of Soybean Research, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
S. Kumar
Affiliation:
ICAR-Indian Institute of Soybean Research, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
P. K. Amrate
Affiliation:
JNKVV, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India
S. Jahagirdar
Affiliation:
UAS, Dharwad, Karnataka, India
S. N. Huilgol
Affiliation:
UAS, Dharwad, Karnataka, India
P. Chakruno
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural Sciences and Rural Development, Medziphema, Nagaland, India
A. Singh
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, CSK Himachal Pradesh Agriculture University, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh, India
S. Maranna
Affiliation:
ICAR-Indian Institute of Soybean Research, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
M. B. Ratnaparkhe
Affiliation:
ICAR-Indian Institute of Soybean Research, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
M. Borah
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, Assam, India
K. P. Singh
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology, G. B. Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India
S. Gupta
Affiliation:
ICAR-Indian Institute of Soybean Research, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
N. Khandekar
Affiliation:
ICAR-Indian Institute of Soybean Research, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
*
Author for correspondence: V. Nataraj, E-mail: natraj0755@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum truncatum is a major soybean disease in India. Genetic resistance is the viable option to combat yield losses due to this disease. In the current study, 19 soybean genotypes were evaluated for anthracnose disease resistance at five locations (Medziphema, Palampur, Dharwad, Jabalpur and Indore) for three consecutive years (2017–2019) to identify stable and superior genotypes as resistant sources and to elucidate genotype (G) × environment (E) interactions. Genotype effect, environment effect and G × E interactions were found significant (P < 0.001) where G × E interactions contributed highest (42.44) to the total variation followed by environment (29.71) and genotype (18.84). Through Weighted Average of Absolute Scores (WAASB) stability analysis, PS 1611 (WAASB score = 0.33) was found to be most stable and through WAASBY superiority analysis NRC 128 (WAASBY score = 94.31) and PS 1611 (WAASBY score = 89.43) were found to be superior for mean performance and stability. These two genotypes could be candidate parents for breeding for durable and stable anthracnose resistance. Through principal component analysis, disease score was found to be positively associated with relative humidity, wind speed at 2 m above ground level, effect of temperature on radiation use efficiency and global solar radiation based on latitude and Julian day. Among the five locations, Indore was found to be highly discriminative with the highest mean disease incidence and could differentiate anthracnose-resistant and susceptible genotypes effectively, therefore can be considered an ideal location for breeding for field resistance against anthracnose disease.

Keywords

Disease pressureenvironmentfield resistanceresistance breeding and stability
Type
Crops and Soils Research Paper
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 159 , Issue 9-10 , November 2021 , pp. 710 - 720
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

First two authors have contributed equally to this work.

References

AICRPS Report (2018) AICRPS Report 2017–18. Indore: ICAR-Indian Institute of Soybean Research. Available at https://iisrindore.icar.gov.in/pdfdoc/AicrpsAR2017-18.pdf (Accessed 12 July 2021).Google Scholar
Annual Report (2019) Annual report 2018–2019. Indore, India: ICAR-Indian Institute of Soybean Research, p. 56. Available at https://iisrindore.icar.gov.in/pdfdoc/AR2019.pdf (Accessed 12 July 2021).Google Scholar
Costa-Neto, G, Galli, G, Carvalho, HF, Crossa, J and Fritsche-Neto, R (2021) EnvRtype: a software to interplay enviromics and quantitative genomics in agriculture. Genes Genomes Genetics 11, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/g3journal/jkab040.Google ScholarPubMed
Das, IK, Palanna, KB, Patro, TSSK, Ganapathy, KN, Kannababu, N, Kumar, S and Tonapi, VA (2021) A multilocational evaluation of blast resistance in a diverse panel of finger millet in India. Crop Protection 139, 105401. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diatta, C, Tovignan, TK, Adoukonou-Sagbadja, H, Aidara, O, Diao, Y, Sarr, MP, Ifie, BE, Offei, SK, Danquah, EY and Cisse, N (2019) Development of sorghum hybrids for stable yield and resistance to grain mold for the Center and South-East of Senegal. Crop Protection 119, 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberhart, SA and Russell, WA (1966) Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Science 6, 36–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finlay, KW and Wilkinson, GN (1963) The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding program. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 14, 742–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauch, HG and Zobel, RW (1988) Predictive and postdictive success of statistical analyses of yield trials. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 76, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gawade, DB, Suryawanshi, AP, Patil, VB, Zagade, SN and Wadje, AG (2009) Screening of soybean cultivars against anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum truncatum. Journal of Plant Disease Science 4, 124–125.Google Scholar
Hartman, GL, Rupe, JC, Sikora, EF, Domier, LL, Davis, JA and Steffey, KL (eds) (2015) Compendium of Soybean Diseases and Pests, vol. 5. Saint Paul, MN, USA: American Phytopathological Society Press.Google Scholar
ICAR (2009) Handbook of Agriculture. New Delhi, India: Indian Council of Agricultural Research, pp. 1143–1150.Google Scholar
Kassambara, A and Mundt, F (2017) Factoextra: extract and visualize the results of multivariate data analyses. R package version 1.0.5. Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=factoextra (Accessed 20 August 2021).Google Scholar
Kulakarni, RN and Chopra, VL (1982) Environment as the cause of differential interaction between host cultivars and pathogenic races. Phytopathology 72, 1384–1386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayee, CD and Dattar, VV (1986) Phytopathometry. Parbhani, Maharashtra, India: Marathwada Agricultural University, p. 85.Google Scholar
Nagaraj, BT, Jahagirdar, S and Basavaraja, GT (2014) Identification of resistant sources in glass house and field evaluation of soybean genotypes to anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum truncatum (schw.) Andrus and Moore. The Bioscan 9, 1333–1336.Google Scholar
Nataraj, V, Kumar, S, Kumawat, G, Shivakumar, M, Rajput, LS, Ratnaparkhe, MB, Ramteke, R, Gupta, S, Satpute, GK, Rajesh, V, Kamble, V and Chandra, S (2019) Charcoal rot resistance in soybean: current understanding and future perspectives. In Wani, SH (ed.), Disease Resistance in Crop Plants. Cham: Springer, pp. 241–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nataraj, V, Shivakumar, M, Kumawat, G, Gupta, S, Rajput, LS, Kumar, S, Sharma, AN and Bhatia, VS (2020) Genetic inheritance and identification of resistant germplasm sources for anthracnose resistance in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 67, 1449–1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nataraj, V, Bhartiya, A, Singh, CP, Devi, HN, Deshmukh, MP, Verghese, P, Singh, K, Mehtre, SP, Kumari, V, Maranna, S, Kumawat, G, Ratnaparkhe, MB, Satpute, GK, Rajesh, V, Chandra, S, Ramteke, R, Khandekar, N and Gupta, S (2021) WAASB-based stability analysis and simultaneous selection for grain yield and early maturity in soybean. Agronomy Journal 113, 3089–3099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olivoto, T and Lucio, ADC (2020) Metan: an R package for multi-environment trial analysis. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 11, 783–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olivoto, T, Lucio, ADC, da Silva, JAG, Marchioro, VS, de Souza, VQ and Jost, E (2019) Mean performance and stability in multi-environment trials I: combining features of AMMI and BLUP techniques. Agronomy Journal 111, 2949–2960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pande, S, Sharma, M, Gaur, PM, Basandrai, AK, Kaur, L, Hooda, KS, Basandrai, D, Babu, TK, Jain, SK and Rathore, A (2013) Biplot analysis of genotype × environment interactions and identification of stable sources of resistance to Ascochyta blight in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Australasian Plant Pathology 42, 561–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pandey, AK, Yee, M, Win, MM, Lwin, HMM, Adapala, G, Rathore, A, Sheu, Z and Nair, RM (2021) Identification of new sources of resistance to dry root rot caused by Macrophomina phaseolina isolates from India and Myanmar in a mungbean mini-core collection. Crop Protection 143, 105569. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2021.105569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persaud, R and Saravanakumar, D (2018) Screening for blast resistance in rice using AMMI models to understand G×E interaction in Guyana. Phytoparasitica 46, 551–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piepho, HP (1994) Best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) for regional yield trials: a comparison to additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) analysis. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 89, 647–654.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sajeesh, PK, Rao, MSL and Shamarao, J (2014) Screening of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merill) genotypes against purple seed stain and anthracnose disease. Environment and Ecology 32, 1092–1095.Google Scholar
Sharma, M, Babu, TK, Gaur, PM, Ghosh, R, Rameshwar, T, Chaudhary, RG, Upadhyay, JP, Gupta, O, Saxena, DR, Kaur, L, Dubey, SC, Anandani, VP, Harer, PN, Rathore, A and Pande, S (2012) Identification and multi-environment validation of resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris in chickpea. Field Crops Research 135, 82–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, M, Babu, TK, Ghosh, R, Telangre, R, Rathore, A, Kaur, L, Kushwaha, KPS, Das, R and Pande, S (2013) Multi-environment field testing for identification and validation of genetic resistance to Botrytis cinerea causing Botrytis grey mold in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Crop Protection 54, 106–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, AN, Gupta, GK, Verma, RK, Sharma, OP, Bhagat, S, Amaresan, N, Saini, MR, Chattopadhyay, C, Sushil, SN, Asre, R, Kapoor, KS, Satyagopal, K and Jeyakumar, P (2014) Integrated Pest Management for Soybean. New Delhi, India: ICAR – National Center for Integrated Pest Management, p. 3.Google Scholar
Srivastava, AK, Saxena, DR, Saabale, PR, Raghuvanshi, KS, Anandani, VP, Singh, RK, Sharma, OP, Wasinikar, AR, Sahni, S, Varshney, RK, Singh, NP and Dixit, GP (2021) Delineation of genotype-by-environment interactions for identification and validation of resistant genotypes in chickpea to fusarium wilt using GGE biplot. Crop Protection 144, 105571. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2021.105571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thakur, RP, Rao, VP, Wu, BM, Subbarao, KV, Shetty, HS, Singh, G, Lukose, C, Panwar, MS, Sereme, P, Hess, DE, Gupta, SC, Dattar, VV, Panicker, S, Pawar, NB, Bhangale, GT and Panchbhai, SD (2004) Host resistance stability to downy mildew in pearl millet and pathogenic variability in Sclerospora graminicola. Crop Protection 23, 901–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tize, I, Fotos, AK, Nukenine, EN, Masso, C, Ngome, FA, Suh, C, Lendzemo, VW, Nchoutnji, I, Manga, G, Parkes, E, Kulakow, P, Kouebou, C, Fiaboe, KKM and Hanna, R (2021) New cassava germplasm for food and nutritional security in Central Africa. Scientific Reports 11, 7394. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86958-w.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Twizeyimana, M, Ojiambo, PS, Ikotun, T, Paul, C, Hartman, GL and Bandyopadhyay, R (2007) Comparison of field, greenhouse, and detached-leaf evaluations of soybean germplasm for resistance to Phakopsora pachyrhizi. Plant Disease 91, 1161–1169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Eeuwijk, FA, Bustos-Korts, DV and Malosetti, M (2016) What should students in plant breeding know about the statistical aspects of genotype × environment interactions? Crop Science 56, 2119–2140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villegas-Fernandez, AM, Sillero, JC, Emeran, AA, Winkler, J, Raffiot, B, Tay, J, Flores, F and Rubiales, D (2009) Identification and multi-environment validation of resistance to Botrytis fabae in Vicia faba. Field Crops Research 114, 84–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrather, A, Shanon, G, Balardin, R, Carregal, L, Escobar, R, Gupta, GK, Ma, Z, Morel, W, Ploper, D and Tenuta, A (2010) Effect of diseases on soybean yield in the top 8 producing countries in 2006. Plant Health Progress 11. doi: 10.1094/PHP-2010-0102-01-RS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, W and Falk, DE (2002) Biplot analysis of host-by-pathogen data. Plant Disease 86, 1396–1401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yan, W, Hunt, L, Sheng, Q and Szlavnics, Z (2000) Cultivar evaluation and mega environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Science 40, 597–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, H and Hartman, GL (2015) Methods and evaluation of soybean genotypes for resistance to Colletotrichum truncatum. Plant Disease 99, 143–148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zobel, RW, Wright, MJ and Gauch, HG (1988) Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agronomy Journal 80, 388–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuffo, AM, Steiner, F, Aguilera, JG, Teodoro, PE, Teodoro, LPR and Busch, A (2020) Multi-trait stability index: a tool for simultaneous selection of soya bean genotypes in drought and saline stress. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 206, 815–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Rajput et al. supplementary material

Rajput et al. supplementary material

Download Rajput et al. supplementary material(File)
File 16.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

Rajput et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S4

Download Rajput et al. supplementary material(File)
File 20.1 KB