Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:23:44.033Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cluster and canonical variate analyses in multilocation trials of linseed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2003

W. ADUGNA
Affiliation:
Holetta Research Centre, Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization, P.O. Box 2003, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Present address: Department of Plant Science (Plant Breeding), UFS, P.O. Box 339, Bloemfontein 9300, Republic of South Africa.
M. T. LABUSCHAGNE
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Science (Plant Breeding), UFS, P.O. Box 339, Bloemfontein 9300, Republic of South Africa

Abstract

Multivariate cluster and canonical variate analyses were undertaken for 10 genotypes of linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) that were tested in a four-times replicated randomized block design across 18 environments (six localities by 3 years) of Ethiopia. The main aims of this study were to determine the similarities and differences of the genotypes and their testing environments, and to compare applicability of the two statistical methods. Cluster analysis grouped the genotypes into five classes in accordance with their original sources. The six locations and 18 environments were stratified into four and seven clusters, respectively. Three sites (Bekoji, Kulumsa and Sinana) were separately stratified, while three other ones (Holetta, Asasa and Adet) showed closer similarity. Canonical variate analysis indicated that ‘D33C’ and ‘D24C’ were distinguished from the other genotypes by their high oil contents. ‘N10D’ and ‘Norlin’ had closer values and were thus preferred for their good seed yield and earliness. Days to flowering and maturity, oil contents and lodging per cent played major roles in discriminating the genotypes. Comparison of the two methods showed clearer differentiation by cluster analysis than canonical variate analysis. Canonical variate analysis also contributed information on how each variable discriminated the genotypes and their test environments. Thus, both methods complement each other in providing useful information for more efficient variety development programmes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)