Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:54:40.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Common wheat and cereal bug interactions: kernel quality depletion and immunodetection of damage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2016

P. VACCINO ,
B. L. INGEGNO ,
M. G. PANSA ,
T. COPPA  and
L. TAVELLA
P. VACCINO
Affiliation:
Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l'analisi dell'economia agraria (CREA), Unità di ricerca per la selezione dei cereali e la valorizzazione delle varietà vegetali, via R. Forlani 3, 26866 Sant'Angelo Lodigiano (LO), Italy
B. L. INGEGNO
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali e Alimentari (DISAFA), ULF Entomologia Generale e Applicata, University of Torino, largo P. Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy
M. G. PANSA
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali e Alimentari (DISAFA), ULF Entomologia Generale e Applicata, University of Torino, largo P. Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy
T. COPPA
Affiliation:
Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l'analisi dell'economia agraria (CREA), Unità di ricerca per la selezione dei cereali e la valorizzazione delle varietà vegetali, via R. Forlani 3, 26866 Sant'Angelo Lodigiano (LO), Italy
L. TAVELLA*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali e Alimentari (DISAFA), ULF Entomologia Generale e Applicata, University of Torino, largo P. Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: luciana.tavella@unito.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Several species of Heteroptera are responsible for kernel damage in wheat, Triticum aestivum L. (Poaceae), which affects bread-making quality. In Europe, the most noxious bugs belong to the genera Eurygaster (Scutelleridae) and Aelia (Pentatomidae). In the present work, five bug species frequently found in wheat fields in north-western Italy, Eurygaster maura, E. austriaca, Aelia acuminata, Nezara viridula and Carpocoris purpureipennis, were tested in field trials for their capacity to induce wheat damage. The sodium dodecyl sulphate sedimentation volume test was used as the qualitative control. Among the bug species tested, E. maura was the most noxious pest, with C. purpureipennis being almost as noxious as E. maura. In contrast, E. austriaca and A. acuminata, which have been considered the wheat pests of major importance, as well as N. viridula, caused no or only moderate damage to wheat quality. The adoption of an antiserum specifically produced with E. maura salivary glands proved to be effective and specific in detecting bug damage. Therefore, this polyclonal antibody is promising for the development of a reliable test for the quick evaluation of commercial wheat flour batches.

Type
Crops and Soils Research Papers
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 155 , Issue 2 , March 2017 , pp. 193 - 204
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

AACC International (2000). Approved Methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemists, 10th edn. St Paul, Minnesota: AACC.Google Scholar
Aja, S., Pérez, G. & Rosell, C. M. (2004). Wheat damage by Aelia spp. and Eurygaster spp.: effects on gluten and water-soluble compounds released by gluten hydrolysis. Journal of Cereal Science 39, 197–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anwar Cheema, M., Irshad, M., Murtaza, M. & Ghani, M. A. (1973). Pentatomids associated with Gramineae and their natural enemies in Pakistan. Technical Bulletin, Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control 16, 47–67.Google Scholar
Blandino, M., Marinaccio, F., Ingegno, B. L., Pansa, M. G., Vaccino, P., Tavella, L. & Reyneri, A. (2015). Evaluation of common and durum wheat rheological quality through Mixolab® analysis after field damage by cereal bugs. Field Crops Research 179, 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borasio, E. (1997). Classificazione merceologica del frumento con indici di qualità. Agricoltura 9, 59–61.Google Scholar
Boselli, F. B. (1932). Studio biologico degli emitteri che attaccano le nocciuole in Sicilia. Bollettino del Laboratorio di Zoologia Generale e Agraria del R. Istituto Superiore Agrario in Portici 26, 142–333.Google Scholar
Canhilal, R., Kutuk, H., Kanat, A. D., Islamoglu, M., El-Haramein, F. & El-Bouhssini, M. (2006). Economic threshold for the sunn pest, Eurygaster integriceps Put. (Hemiptera: Scutelleridae), on wheat in southeastern Turkey. Journal of Agricultural and Urban Entomology 22, 191–201.Google Scholar
Coutin, R., Milaire, H. G., Monnet, Y. & Robin, J. (1984). Cultures fruitières. Punaises et poires pierreuses. Phytoma 335, 31–34.Google Scholar
Critchley, B. R. (1998). Literature review of sunn pest Eurygaster integriceps Put. (Hemiptera, Scutelleridae). Crop Protection 17, 271–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darkoh, C., El-Bouhssini, M., Baum, M. & Clack, B. (2010). Characterization of a prolyl endoprotease from Eurygaster integriceps Puton (Sunn pest) infested wheat. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 74, 163–178.Google Scholar
del Cañizo, J. (1941). Notas sobre el “Sampedrito” del trigo. Boletín de Patología Vegetal 10, 264–274.Google Scholar
Djavaheri, M. (1979). Les punaises nuisibles aux cereales en Iran et les methodes de prevention des degats. IOBC/WPRS Bulletin 2, 18–21.Google Scholar
Dolgikh, V. V., Senderskii, I. V. & Konarev, A. V. (2014). Production and properties of recombinant glutenin-hydrolyzing proteinases from Eurygaster integriceps Put. Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology 50, 433–440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
European Community (EC) (2009). Directive 2009/128/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for community action to achieve the sustainable use of pesticides (Text with EEA relevance). Official Journal of the European Union L309, 71–86.Google Scholar
Every, D. (1992). Relationship of bread baking quality to levels of visible wheat-bug damage and insect proteinase activity in wheat. Journal of Cereal Science 16, 183–193.Google Scholar
Every, D., Farrell, J. A., Stufkens, M. W. & Wallace, A. R. (1998). Wheat cultivar susceptibility to grain damage by the New Zealand wheat bug, Nysius huttoni, and cultivar susceptibility to the effects of bug proteinase on baking quality. Journal of Cereal Science 27, 37–46.Google Scholar
Every, D., Sutton, K. H., Shewry, P. R., Tatham, A. S. & Coolbear, T. (2005). Specificity of action of an insect proteinase purified from wheat grain infested by the New Zealand wheat bug, Nysius huttoni . Journal of Cereal Science 42, 185–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goidanich, A. (1975). Uomini, storie e insetti italiani nella scienza del passato. I precursori minori. Parte prima. Redia 57, 1–509.Google Scholar
Hosseininaveh, V., Bandani, A. & Hosseininaveh, F. (2009). Digestive proteolytic activity in the Sunn pest, Eurygaster integriceps . Journal of Insect Science 9, article 70. Available from: http://jinsectscience.oxfordjournals.org/content/jis/9/1/70.full.pdf (verified 22 January 2016).Google Scholar
Infiesta, E., Goula, G., Monleon, T., Valero, J. & Gordun, E. (1999). ‘Aelia’ y ‘Eurygaster’ en muestras de trigos españoles de 1997. Molineria y Panaderia 94, 61–66.Google Scholar
Kinaci, E., Kinaci, G., Yildirim, A. F. & Atli, A. (1998). Sunn pest problem in Central Anatolia and the role of wheat varieties in integrated control. Euphytica 100, 63–67.Google Scholar
Konarev, A. V., Beaudoin, F., Marsh, J., Vilkova, N. A., Nefedova, L. I., Sivri Özay, D., Koksel, H., Shewry, P. R. & Lovegrove, A. (2011). Characterization of a glutenin-specific serine proteinase of sunn bug Eurygaster integriceps Put. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 59, 2462–2470.Google Scholar
Lait, C. G., Bates, S. L., Kermode, A. R., Morrissette, K. K. & Borden, J. H. (2001). Specific biochemical marker-based techniques for the identification of damage to Douglas-fir seed resulting from feeding by the western conifer seed bug, Leptoglossus occidentalis Heidemann (Hemiptera: Coreidae). Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 31, 739–746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lait, C. G., Miller, D. R., Bates, S. L., Borden, J. H. & Kermode, A. R. (2003). Biochemical assay detects feeding damage to loblolly pine seeds caused by the leaffooted pine seed bug (Hemiptera: Coreidae). Journal of Entomological Science 38, 644–653.Google Scholar
Malenotti, E. (1931). Note sulla Aelia acuminata L. L'Italia Agricola 68, 905–924.Google Scholar
Olanca, B. & Sivri Özay, D. (2010). Preparation and functional properties of gluten hydrolyzates with wheat bug (Eurygaster spp.) protease. Cereal Chemistry 87, 518–523.Google Scholar
Özgen, I., GözüaçIk, C., Karsavuran, Y. & Fent, M. (2005). Investigations on the Pentatomidae (Heteroptera) fauna in wheat-growing areas in Southeastern Anatolia Region (Turkey). Turkish Journal of Entomology 29, 61–68. Google Scholar
Parker, B. L., El-Bouhssini, M. & Skinner, M. (2001). Field Guide: Insect Pests of Wheat and Barley in North Africa, West and Central Asia. Aleppo, Syria: ICARDA.Google Scholar
Paulian, F. & Popov, C. (1980). Sunn pest or cereal bug. In Wheat Documenta (Ed. Hafliger, E.), pp. 69–74. Basel, Switzerland: Ciba-Geigy.Google Scholar
Pérez, G., Bonet, A. & Rosell, C. M. (2005). Relationship between gluten degradation by Aelia spp and Eurygaster spp and protein structure. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 85, 1125–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinna, M., Arnoulet, M., Gamba, U., Ingegno, B. L., Pansa, M. G., Tavella, L., Ferro, P. & Peris, L. (2012). Le cimici del frumento in Piemonte: monitoraggio sul territorio, valutazione del danno in relazione alla densità, ruolo di contenimento svolto dai parassitoidi. Quaderni della Regione Piemonte: Agricoltura 77(Supplement), 108–114.Google Scholar
Ribes, J. & Pagola-Carte, S. (2013). Hémiptères Pentatomoidea Euro-Méditerranéens (Volume 2). Pentatomidae, Pentatomini Faune de France 96 . Montpellier, France: Fédération Française des Sociétés de Sciences Naturelles.Google Scholar
Rosell, C. M., Aja, S., Bean, S. & Lookhart, G. (2002). Effect of Aelia spp. and Eurygaster spp. damage on wheat proteins. Cereal Chemistry 79, 801–805.Google Scholar
Ruiz, D., Monleón, T., Pujol, M., Gordún, E. & Goula, M. (2001). Estudio de las chinches de los cereales (Insecta, Heteroptera) en los trigos españoles. Campañas 1999–2000. Sessio Conjunta d'Entomología ICHN-SCL 12, 139–154.Google Scholar
Ruiz, D., Goula, M., Infiesta, E., Monleón, T., Pujol, M. & Gordún, E. (2003). Guía de identificación de los chinches de los cereales (Insecta, Heteroptera) encontrados en los trigos españoles. Boletín de Sanidad Vegetal Plagas 29, 535–552.Google Scholar
Shewry, P. R., Halford, N. G., Tatham, A. S., Popineau, Y., Lafiandra, D. & Belton, P. S. (2003). The high molecular weight subunits of wheat glutenin and their role in determining wheat processing properties. Advances in Food Nutrition Research 45, 219–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sivri, D., Sapirstein, H. D., Köksel, H. & Bushuk, W. (1999). Effects of wheat bug (Eurygaster maura) protease on glutenin proteins. Cereal Chemistry 76, 816–820.Google Scholar
Stavraki, H. G. (1979). Heteropteres signales en Grece au cours des annees 1969–1975. IOBC/WPRS Bulletin 2, 34–49.Google Scholar
Tamanini, L. (1959). I Carpocoris della regione paleartica. Tabella per la determinazione della entità e loro distribuzione. Memorie della Società Entomologica Italiana 38, 120–142.Google Scholar
Vaccino, P., Corbellini, M., Reffo, G., Zoccatelli, G., Migliardi, M. & Tavella, L. (2006). Impact of Eurygaster maura (Heteroptera: Scutelleridae) Feeding on quality of bread wheat in relation to attack period. Journal of Economic Entomology 99, 757–763.Google Scholar
Vaccino, P., Guidone, L., Corbellini, M. & Tavella, L. (2008). Detection of damage due to bug feeding on hazelnut and wheat by biochemical techniques. Bulletin of Insectology 61, 189–190.Google Scholar
Vaccino, P., Pansa, M. G. & Tavella, L. (2012). Il problema cimici: rilevamento del danno e gestione delle infestazioni. In L'Industria Molitoria a Frumento in Piemonte (Ed. Mancuso, T.), pp. 81–92. Milan, Italy: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar
Viator, H. P., Pantoja, A. & Smith, C. M. (1983). Damage to wheat seed quality and yield by the rice stink bug and southern green stink bug (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 76, 1410–1413.Google Scholar
Vidal, J. (1949). Hémiptères de l'Afrique du nord et des Pays circum-Méditerranéens. Mémoires de la Société des Sciences Naturelles du Maroc 48, 1–238.Google Scholar
Yandamuri, R. C., Gautam, R., Darkoh, C., Dareddy, V., El-Bouhssini, M. & Clack, B. A. (2014). Cloning, expression, sequence analysis and homology modeling of the prolyl endoprotease from Eurygaster integriceps puton. Insects 5, 762–782.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zadoks, J. C., Chang, T. T. & Konzak, C. F. (1974). A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415–421.Google Scholar