Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:27:03.955Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Competition between natural populations of Dactylis glomerata

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

C. F. Eagles  and
D. H. Williams
C. F. Eagles
Affiliation:
Welsh Plant Breeding Station, Aberystwyth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The competitive abilities of two natural populations of Dactylis glomeratafrom Norway and Portugal were studied under three controlled environments, 7 °C with an 8 h photoperiod, 20 °C with a 16 h photoperiod, and 30 °C with a 16 h photoperiod. The temperature and daylength treatments affected both the growth habits and the relative competitive abilities of the populations. At 7 °C, 8 h photoperiod the Norwegian population became prostrate and was suppressed in mixed culture compared with its performance in monoculture, and an increased specific leaf area indicated competition for light. At 30 °C, 16 h photoperiod the Norwegian population was more erect than the Portuguese, and more aggressive, with a better performance in mixed culture than in monoculture. The performance of the Portuguese population was not affected significantly either by culture or by environment. At 20 °C, 16 h photoperiod, however, the Portuguese population was suppressed, while the Norwegian population performed better in mixed than in monoculture. This yield increase of the Norwegian population was greater than the decrease of the Portuguese population, and so the mixed culture yielded significantly more than the mean of its component monocultures, whereas at 7 and 30 °C the mixed culture yielded no more than the mean of its monocultures. The physiological basis of these competitive effects is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 77 , Issue 2 , October 1971 , pp. 187 - 193
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aberg, E., Johnson, I. J. & Wilsie, C. P. (1943). Associations between species of grasses and legumes. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 35, 357–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcock, M. B. &Morgan, E. W. (1966). The effect of frequency of defoliation on the yield of mixtures of S. 22 (diploid) and Tetra (tetraploid) Italian ryegrass in early establishment. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 21, 62–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergh, J. P. Van Den (1968). An analysis of yields of grasses in mixed and pure stands. Versl. landbouwk. Onderz. 714.Google Scholar
Bergh, J. P. Van Den &Elberse, W. T. (1962). Competition between Lolium perenne L. and Anthoxanthum odoratum L. at two levels of phosphate and potash. J. Ecol. 50, 87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J. N. (1960). The significance of petiole length, leaf area, and light interception in competition between strains of subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum L.) grown in swards. Aust. J. agri. Res. 11, 277–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaser, R. E., Taylor, T. H., Griffeth, W. & Skrdla, W. (1956). Seedling competition in establishing forage plants. Agron. J. 48, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, C. M. (1956). Competition among pasture plants. Proc. 1th int. Orassld Congr., Palmerston North, N.Z. 80–91.Google Scholar
Donald, C. M. (1963). Competition among crop and pasture plants. Adv. Agron. 15, 1–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagles, C. F. (1967). The effect of temperature on vegetative growth in climatic races of Dactylis glomerata in controlled environments. Ann. Bot. N.S. 31, 31–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagles, C. F. &Williams, D. H. (1969). Effect of environment on competitive ability of two natural populations of Dactylis glomerata L. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 72, 271–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
England, F. (1968). Competition in mixtures of herbage grasses. J. appl. Ecol. 5, 227–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, I.(1968). Yield of contrasting ryegrass varieties in monoculture and mixed culture. J. Br. Orassld Soc. 23, 156–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, I. (1969). The yield, canopy structure and light interception of two ryegrass varieties in mixed culture and monoculture. J. Br. Orassld Soc. 24, 123–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, W. J. & O'Brien, T. A. (1968). A comparison of yield from plots sown with a single species or a mixture of species. J. appl. Ecol. 5, 209–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar