Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T23:28:58.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crop succession and split-application of nitrogen effects on common bean yield in short no-tillage system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2021

F. L. C. Mingotte ,
C. A. Jardim ,
A. P. Coelho Open the ORCID record for A. P. Coelho [Opens in a new window] ,
M. M. Yada ,
F. T. Leal ,
S. S. Souza ,
L. B. Lemos  and
D. Fornasieri Filho
F. L. C. Mingotte
Affiliation:
São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donatto Castellane, km 5, s/n. 14884-900, Brazil
C. A. Jardim
Affiliation:
São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donatto Castellane, km 5, s/n. 14884-900, Brazil
A. P. Coelho*
Affiliation:
São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donatto Castellane, km 5, s/n. 14884-900, Brazil
M. M. Yada
Affiliation:
São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donatto Castellane, km 5, s/n. 14884-900, Brazil
F. T. Leal
Affiliation:
São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donatto Castellane, km 5, s/n. 14884-900, Brazil
S. S. Souza
Affiliation:
São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donatto Castellane, km 5, s/n. 14884-900, Brazil
L. B. Lemos
Affiliation:
São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donatto Castellane, km 5, s/n. 14884-900, Brazil
D. Fornasieri Filho
Affiliation:
São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donatto Castellane, km 5, s/n. 14884-900, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: A. P. Coelho, E-mail: anderson_100ssp@hotmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Evaluating the effects of crop successions in no-tillage system (NTS) is essential for the correct recommendation of agronomic practices, such as top-dressing nitrogen fertilization. The aim was to evaluate the effect of the crop succession and the splitting of top-dressing N fertilization on the agronomic performance and economic viability of common bean crop. The experiment was conducted in southeastern Brazil for two agricultural seasons in an area under NTS, using a split-plot in randomized complete block design. The plots represented three cropping successions (maize in sole crop, maize intercropped with Urochloa ruziziensis and U. ruziziensis in sole crop) and the subplots composed of ten combinations of splitting of top-dressing N, at the stages V3, V4 and R5 of the common bean crop. In relation to the single application of the N dose of 90 kg ha−1, the common bean had higher response as a function of the N splitting schemes adopted, regardless of the previous cropping succession. The cropping successions evaluated did not interfere with the seed yield of common bean as subsequent crop, even at the beginning of the establishment of NTS. To obtain higher seed yield and economic viability, the N dose of 90 kg ha−1 indicated for the crop must be split and applied among the phenological stages V3, V4 and R5.

Keywords

Economic viabilityintercroppingPhaseolus vulgaris L.seed yieldsoil cultivation
Type
Crops and Soils Research Paper
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 159 , Issue 3-4 , April 2021 , pp. 249 - 257
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, RG, Pereira, LS, Raes, D and Smith, M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration – guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. Fao, Rome, 300(9), D05109.Google Scholar
Alvares, CA, Stape, JL, Sentelhas, PC, Moraes, G, Leonardo, J and Sparovek, G (2013) Köppen's climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 22, 711–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amaral, CBD, Pinto, CC, Flôres, JDA, Mingotte, FLC, Lemos, LB and Fornasieri Filho, D (2016) Yield and quality of common bean cultivated on grass straws and fertilized with nitrogen under no-tillage. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 51, 1602–1609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amaral, CB, Oliveira, GHF and Môro, GV (2018) Phenotyping open-pollinated maize varieties for environments with low nitrogen availability. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 64, 1465–1472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambrosano, EJ, Wutke, EB, Bulisani, EA and Cantarella, H (1997) Feijão. In Raij, BV, Cantarella, H, Quaggio, JA and Furlani, AMC (eds.), Recomendação de adubação e calagem para o Estado de São Paulo, 2nd Edn. Campinas:, Instituto Agronômico, 1997. pp. 194–195. (Boletim técnico, 100).Google Scholar
Bataglia, OC, Furlani, AMC, Teixeira, JPF, Furlani, PR and Gallo, JR (1983) Métodos de análise química de plantas. Campinas: Instituto Agronômico, 48p. (Boletim técnico, 78).Google Scholar
Bolsa de Cereais de São Paulo (2014) Boletim Informativo Diário n° 11.850. Disponível em: <www.bcsp.com.br>. Acesso em: 29 maio de 2014..+Acesso+em:+29+maio+de+2014.>Google Scholar
Crusciol, CA, Nascente, AS, Borghi, E, Soratto, RP and Martins, PO (2015) Improving soil fertility and crop yield in a tropical region with palisadegrass cover crops. Agronomy Journal 107, 2271–2280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunha, PCRD, Silveira, PMD, Nascimento, JLD and Alves Júnior, J (2013) Irrigation management in bean crop cultivated in no-tillage system. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 17, 735–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elifantz, H, Kautsky, L, Mor-Yosef, M, Tarchitzky, J, Bar-Tal, A, Chen, Y and Minz, D (2011) Microbial activity and organic matter dynamics during 4 years of irrigation with treated wastewater. Microbial Ecological 62, 973–981.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fageria, NK, Melo, LC and Oliveira, J (2013) Nitrogen use efficiency in dry bean genotypes. Journal of Plant Nutrition 36, 2179–2190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fageria, NK, Ferreira, EPB, Melo, LC and Knupp, AM (2014) Genotypic differences in dry bean yield and yield components as influenced by nitrogen fertilization and rhizobia. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 45, 1583–1604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAOSTAT – Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2020) FAOSTAT Crops. Disponível em: < http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC> Acesso em 14 feb. 2020.+Acesso+em+14+feb.+2020.>Google Scholar
Fernández, F, Gepts, P and López, M (1985) Etapas de dessarollo en la planta del frijol. In López, M, Fernández, F and Schoonhoven, AV (eds), Frijol: investigación y producción. Cali: CIAT, pp. 61–78.Google Scholar
Ferreira, DF (2011) Sisvar: a computer statistical analysis system. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 35, 1039–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, AO, Amado, T, Rice, CW, Diaz, DAR, Keller, C and Inagaki, TM (2016) Can no-till grain production restore soil organic carbon to levels natural grass in a subtropical Oxisol? Agriculture, Ecosystem & Environment 229, 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flôres, JDA, Amaral, CBD, Pinto, CC, Mingotte, FLC and Lemos, LB (2017) Agronomic and qualitative traits of common bean as a function of the straw and nitrogen fertilization. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical 47, 195–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopalakrishnan, S, Watanabe, T, Pearse, JS, Ito, O, Hossain, ZAKM and Subbarao, GV (2009) Biological nitrification inhibition by Brachiaria humidicola roots varies with soil type and inhibits nitrifying bacteria, but not other major soil microorganisms. Soil Science & Plant Nutrition 55, 725–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IEA - Instituto de Economia Agrícola (2014) Preços médios pagos. Disponível em. Accessed on May 29, 2014.Google Scholar
Leal, FT, Filla, VA, Bettiol, JVT, Sandrini, FDOT, Mingotte, FLC and Lemos, LB (2019) Use efficiency and responsivity to nitrogen of common bean cultivars. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 43, e004919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, S, Zhang, X, Zhao, J, Zhang, J, Müller, C and Cai, Z (2017) Effects of long-term no tillage treatment on gross soil N transformations in black soil in Northeast China. Geoderma 301, 42–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luetzenburg, G, Bittner, MJ, Calsamiglia, A, Renschler, CS, Estrany, J and Poeppl, R (2020) Climate and land use change effects on soil erosion in two small agricultural catchment systems Fugnitz–Austria, Can Revull–Spain. Science of the Total Environment 704, 135389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moraes, MT, Debiasi, H, Carlesso, R, Franchini, JC, Silva, VR and Luz, FB (2016) Soil physical quality on tillage and cropping systems after two decades in the subtropical region of Brazil. Soil & Tillage Research 155, 351–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, SH and Pereira, PAA (1995) Nitrogen fixation of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) as affected by mineral nitrogen supply at different growth stages. Plant and Soil 177, 55–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunes, HD, Leal, FT, Mingotte, FLC, Damião, VD, Couto Júnior, PA and Lemos, LB (2020) Agronomic performance, quality and nitrogen use efficiency by common bean cultivars. Journal of Plant Nutrition 44, 1–15.Google Scholar
Pimentel Gomes, F (1976) Curso de estatística experimental, 6th Edn. Piracicaba: Nobel. 430p.Google Scholar
Plaza-Bonilla, D, Cantero-Martínez, C, Viñas, P and Álvaro-Fuentes, J (2013) Soil aggregation and organic carbon protection in a no-tillage chronosequence under Mediterranean conditions. Geoderma 193, 76–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruidisch, M, Bartsch, S, Kettering, J, Huwe, B and Frei, S (2013) The effect of fertilizer best management practices on nitrate leaching in a plastic mulched ridge cultivation system. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 169, 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soil Survey Staff (2014) Soil Taxonomy, 12th Edn., Washington, DC: USDANRCS, Washington DC, USA.Google Scholar
Soratto, RP, Perez, AA and Fernandes, AM (2014) Age of no-till system and nitrogen management on common bean nutrition and yield. Agronomy Journal 106, 809–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souza, SSD, Couto Júnior, PA, Flôres, JDA, Mingotte, FLC and Lemos, LB (2019) Maize cropping systems and response of common bean in succession subjected to nitrogen fertilization. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical 49, e55718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Struik, PC and Kuyper, T (2017) Sustainable intensification in agriculture: the richer shade of green. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 37, 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viana, JDS, Palaretti, LF, Faria, RT, Delgado, YV, Dalri, AB and Barbosa, JDA (2020) Potato production affected by fertilization methods, masses of seed tubers and water regimes. Horticultura Brasileira 38, 166–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viero, F, Bayer, C, Vieira, RCB and Carniel, E (2015) Management of irrigation and nitrogen fertilizers to reduce ammonia volatilization. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 39, 1737–1743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, A, Wells, MS, Dickey, DA, Hu, S, Maul, J, Raskin, DT, Reberg-Horton, C and Mirsky, SB (2018) Establishing the relationship of soil nitrogen immobilization to cereal rye residues in a mulched system. Plant and Soil 426, 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar