Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-hw7sx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T20:51:01.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Current topics in drought physiology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. G. Jones  and
J. E. Corlett
H. G. Jones
Affiliation:
Horticulture Research International, Wellesbourne, Warwick CV35 9EF, UK
J. E. Corlett
Affiliation:
Horticulture Research International, Wellesbourne, Warwick CV35 9EF, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Drought is probably the most important factor limiting crop yields worldwide, therefore it is not surprising that there has been continuing interest in the ways in which drought affects crop yield. Efforts have been concentrated in this area in the hope that it would prove possible to use a knowledge of drought physiology to provide a rational basis for the development of rapid methods of breeding drought tolerant cultivars, and also to help in the improvement of crop management for dry conditions. The last five years have seen some important reassessments of the underlying principles and concepts involved in plant response to drought and these will be outlined in this brief review. Some of these important shifts in emphasis have been highlighted by Kramer (1988), Passioura (1988), Schulze el al. (1988) and Boyer (1989), particularly in relation to the question of what measure of water stress is most relevant to plant function. As it is not possible to cover all aspects of drought physiology in a brief review of this nature, we highlight four topics where recent findings may have particular relevance to the improvement of drought tolerance in agricultural crops.

Information

Type
Review
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 119 , Issue 3 , December 1992 , pp. 291 - 296
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Acock, B., Charles-Edwards, D. A., Fitter, D. J., Hand, D. W., Ludwig, L. J., Warren-Wilson, J. & Withers, A. C. (1978). The contribution of leaves from different levels within a tomato crop to canopy net photosynthesis: an experimental examination of two canopy models. Journal of Experimental Botany 29, 815–827.Google Scholar
Adams, W. W., Smith, S. D. & Osmond, C. B. (1987). Photoinhibition of the CAM succulent Opuntia basilaris growing in Death Valley: evidence from 77K fluorescence and quantum yield. Oecologia 71, 221–228.Google Scholar
Bates, L. M. & Hall, A. E. (1981). Stomatal closure with soil moisture depletion not associated with changes in bulk water status. Oecologia 50, 62–65.Google Scholar
Begg, J. E. & Turner, N. C. (1976). Crop water deficits. Advances in Agronomy 28, 161–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben, G.-Y., Osmond, C. B. & Sharkey, T. D. (1987). Comparison of photosynthetic responses of Xanthium strumarium and Helianthus annuus to chronic and acute water stress in sun and shade. Plant Physiology 84, 476–482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blackman, P. G. & Davies, W. J. (1985). Root to shoot communication in maize plants of the effects of soil drying. Journal of Experimental Botany 36, 39–48.Google Scholar
Blake, J. & Ferrell, W. K. (1977). The association between soil and xylem water potential, leaf resistance, and abscisic acid content in droughted seedlings of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii). Physiologia Planlarum 39, 106–109.Google Scholar
Boyer, J. S. (1989). Water potential and plant metabolism: comments on Dr P. J. Kramer's article ‘Changing concepts regarding plant water relations’. Plant, Cell & Environment 12, 213–216.Google Scholar
Briggs, L. J. & Shantz, H. L. (1912). The relative wilting coefficient for different plants. Botanical Gazette 53, 229–235.Google Scholar
Brough, D. W., Jones, H. G. & Grace, J. (1986). Diurnal changes in water content of the stems of apple trees, as influenced by irrigation. Plant, Cell & Environment 9, 1–7.Google Scholar
Chaves, M. M. (1991). Effects of water deficits on carbon assimilation. Journal of Experimental Botany 42, 1–16.Google Scholar
Cornic, G., Le, Gouallec J.-L., Briantais, J. M. & Hodges, M. (1989). Effect of dehydration and high light on photosynthesis of two C3 plants (Phaseolus vulgaris L. and Elalostema repens (Lour.) Hall f.). Planta 177, 84–90.Google Scholar
Davies, W. J. & Zhang, J. (1991). Root signals and the regulation of growth and development of plants in drying soil. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Molecular Biology 42, 55–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farquhar, G. D.Wong, S. C., Evans, J. R. & Hubick, K. T. (1989). Photosynthesis and gas exchange. In Plants Under Stress (Eds Jones, H. H., Flowers, T. T. & Jones, M. M.), pp. 47–69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gollan, T., Passioura, J. B. & Munns, R. (1985). Soil water status affects the stomatal conductance of fully turgid wheat and sunflower leaves. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 13, 459–464.Google Scholar
Gowing, D. J. G., Davies, W. J. & Jones, H. G. (1990). A positive root-sourced signal as an indicator of soil drying in apple Malus × domestica Borkh. Journal of Experimental Botany 41, 1535–1540.Google Scholar
Hsiao, T. C. (1973). Plant responses to water stress. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 24, 519–570.Google Scholar
Jarvis, P. G. & Mcnaughton, K. G. (1986). Stomatal control of transpiration: scaling up from leaf to region. Advances in Ecological Research 15, 1–49.Google Scholar
Jones, H.G. (1973). Photosynthesis by thin leaf-slices in solution. II Osmotic stress and its effects on photosynthesis. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 26, 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, H. G. (1980). Interaction and integration of adaptive responses to water stress: the implications of an unpredictable environment. In Adaptation of Plants to Water and High Temperature Stress (Eds Turner, N. N. & Kramer, P. P.), pp. 353–365. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Jones, H. G. (1983). Estimation of an effective soil water potential at the root surface of transpiring plants. Plant, Cell & Environment 6, 671–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, H. G. (1985). Partitioning stomatal and non-stomatal limitations to photosynthesis. Plant, Cell & Environment 8, 95–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, H. G. (1990). Physiological aspects of the control of water status in horticultural crops. HortScience 25, 19–26.Google Scholar
Jones, H. G. (1992). Plants and Microclimate (2nd edn). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, H. G. & Sutherland, R. A. (1991). Stomatal control of xylem embolism. Plant, Cell & Environment 14, 607–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kacser, H. & Burns, J. A. (1973). The control of flux. In Rate Control of Biological Processes (Ed. Davies, D. D.), pp. 65–104. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaiser, W. M. (1987). Effect of water deficit on photosynthetic capacity. Physiologia Plantarum 71, 142–149.Google Scholar
Kramer, P. J. (1988). Changing concepts regarding plant water relations. Plant, Cell & Environment 11, 565–568.Google Scholar
Krause, G. H. & Weis, E. (1991). Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: the basics. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Molecular Biology 42, 313–349.Google Scholar
Legg, B. J., Day, W., Lawlor, D. W. & Parkinson, K. J. (1979). The effects of drought on barley growth: models and measurements showing the relative importance of leaf area and photosynthetic rate. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 703–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludlow, M. M. & Björkman, O. (1984). Paraheliotropic leaf movement in Siratro as a protective mechanism against drought-induced damage to primary photosynthetic reactions: damage by excessive light and heat. Planta 161, 505–518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ludlow, M. M. & Powles, S. B. (1988). Effects of photo-inhibition induced by water stress on growth and yield of grain sorghum. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 15, 179–194.Google Scholar
Mansfield, T. A. & Davies, W. J. (1985). Mechanisms for leaf control of gas exchange. Bioscience 35, 158–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, B. & Willey, R. W. (1983). Radiation interception and growth in an intercrop of pearl millet/groundnut. Field Crops Research 7, 141–160.Google Scholar
Masojidek, J., Trivedi, S., Halshaw, L., Alexiou, A. & Hall, D. O. (1991). The synergistic effect of drought and light stresses in sorghum and pearl millet. Plant Physiology 96, 198–207.Google Scholar
Massacci, A. & Jones, H. G. (1990). Use of simultaneous analysis of gas-exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence quenching for analysing the effects of water stress on photosynthesis in apple leaves. Trees – Structure and Function 4, 1–8.Google Scholar
McPherson, H. G. & Slatyer, R. O. (1973). Mechanisms regulating photosynthesis in Pennisetum typhoides. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 26, 329–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monteith, J. L. (1965). Evaporation and the environment. Symposium of the Society for Experimental Biology 19, 205–234.Google Scholar
Monteith, J. L. (1977). Climate and efficiency of crop production in Britain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 281, 277–294.Google Scholar
Ort, D. R. & Baker, N. R. (1988). Consideration of photosynthetic efficiency at low light as a major determinant of crop photosynthetic performance. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 26, 555–565.Google Scholar
Passioura, J. B. (1988). Response to Dr P. J. Kramer's article, ‘Changing concepts regarding plant water relations’. Plant, Cell & Environment 11, 569–571.Google Scholar
Russell, G., Jarvis, P. G. & Monteith, J. L. (1989). Absorption of radiation by canopies and stand growth. In Plant Canopies: Their Growth, Form and Function (Eds G., Russell, B., Marshall & Jarvis, P. P.), pp. 21–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schulze, E.-D., Steudle, E., Gollan, T. & Schurr, U. (1988). Response to Dr P. J. Kramer's article, ‘Changing concepts regarding plant water relations’. Plant, Cell & Environment 11, 573–576.Google Scholar
Slatyer, R. O. (1967). Plant Water Relationships. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, T. R. & Ludlow, M. M. (1985). Who taught plants thermodynamics? The unfulfilled potential of plant water potential. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 12, 213–217.Google Scholar
Sperry, J. S., Donnelly, J. R. & Tyree, M. T. (1988). A method for measuring hydraulic conductivity and embolism in xylem. Plant, Cell & Environment 11, 35–40.Google Scholar
Stitt, M. (1991). Rising CO2 levels and their potential significance for carbon flow in photosynthetic cells. Plant, Cell & Environment 14, 741–762.Google Scholar
Tyree, M. T. & Dixon, M. A. (1983). Cavitation events in Thuja occidentalis L.? Ultrasonic acoustic emissions from the sapwood can be measured. Plant Physiology 72, 1094–1099.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyree, M. T. & Sperry, J. S. (1989). Vulnerability of xylem to cavitation and embolism. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Molecular Biology 40, 19–38.Google Scholar
Tyree, M. T., Fiscus, E. L., Wullschleger, S. D. & Dixon, M. A. (1986). Detection of xylem cavitation in corn under field conditions. Plant Physiology 82, 597–599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veihmeyer, F. J. & Hendrickson, A. H. (1927). Soil moisture conditions in relation to plant growth. Plant Physiology 2, 71–82.Google Scholar