Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:30:43.018Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Determination of ammonia and nitrate in soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. M. Bremner
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts
K. Shaw
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts

Extract

1. Methods for the determination of ammonia and nitrate in soil are described. The ammonia and nitrate are extracted at pH 1·0–1·5 with a mixture of potassium sulphate and sulphuric acid, and the ammonia is determined by distillation with magnesium oxide at 25° C. in a modified Conway microdiffusion unit. Ammonia plus nitrate is determined on a separate sample of the same extract by reduction of the nitrate to ammonia with titanous hydroxide and subsequent distillation with magnesium oxide, both the reduction and distillation being carried out in a modified microdiffusion unit at 25° C.

2. The methods are applicable to coloured extracts and are not affected by substances found to interfere with other methods of determining ammonia and nitrate.

3. It is suggested that the methods may also prove useful for the determination of ammonia and nitrate in plant materials.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bengtsson, N. (1924). Soil Sci. 18, 255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremner, J. M. & Shaw, K. (1954). J. Agric. Sci. 44, 152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremner, J. M. & Shaw, K. (1955). Analyst (in the Press).Google Scholar
Conway, E. J. (1947). Microdiffusion Analysis and Volumetric Error, 2nd ed.London: Crosby Lockwood.Google Scholar
Conway, E. J. & O'Malley, E. (1942). Biochem. J. 36, 655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, H. J. (1924). Industr. Engng Chem. 16, 180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C. M. & Ulrich, A. (1950). Anal. Chem. 22, 1526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C. B. & Underdown, R. E. (1953). Anal. Chem. 25, 806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knecht, E. (1903). Ber. dtsch. chem. Ges. 36, 166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathews, D. V. (1920). J. Agric. Sci. 10, 72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, W. & Robinson, G. W. (1924). J. Agric. Sci. 14, 548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, C. (1929). C.R. Lab. Carlsberg, 17, no. 15.Google Scholar
Potter, P. S. & Snyder, B. S. (1915). J. Industr. Engng Chem. 7, 221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pucher, G. W., Vickery, H. B. & Leavenworth, C. S. (1935). Industr. Engng Chem. (Anal, ed.), 7, 152.Google Scholar
Pyne, G. T. (1927). J. Agric. Sci. 17, 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, H. L. (1938). J. Agric. Sci. 28, 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roller, E. M. & McKaig, N. (1939). Soil Sci. 47, 397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shinn, M. B. (1941). Industr. Engng Chem. (Anal, ed.), 13, 33.Google Scholar
Sowden, F. J. & Atkinson, H. J. (1949). Canad. J. Res. B, 27, 76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vakner, J. E., Bulen, W. A., Vanecko, S. & Bubrell, R. C. (1953). Anal. Chem. 25, 1528.Google Scholar