Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:29:09.302Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Developmental characteristics of grass varieties in relation to their herbage production: 3. Tiller development in Dactylis glomerata and Loliutn perenne in relation to head emergence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

I. Davies
I. Davies
Affiliation:
Welsh Plant Breeding Station, Aberystwyth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Features of the gross morphology of primary growth of Dactylis glomerata and Lolium perenne, and associated changes in digestibility are described.

Species differences were noted with regard to the relationships between head emergence and the time when stem apices were raised to defoliation height, vegetative/ reproductive tiller ratios, and tiller size.

Also there were differences in the sequence of extension growth of leaf sheaths, internodes and inflorescence leading to emergence of the head. Associated changes in the vertical distribution of leaf blades were examined.

In perennial ryegrass extension growth of the inflorescence continued after emergence had begun, but not in cocksfoot. Weight increments in the inflorescence, from emergence onward, followed the same pattern in the two species, however.

Differences in the developmental patterns of the two grasses did not appear to influence their relative digestibility.

Upper internodes of reproductive tillers of S. 24 ryegrass declined rapidly in digestibility Species differences, and the pattern of changes in the digestibility of lower and upper parts of reproductive tillers are discussed in relation to mechanical aspects of sward development and micro-environmental effects.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 91 , Issue 1 , August 1978 , pp. 117 - 129
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bower, F. O. (1939). Botany of the Living Plant. London: Maomillan.Google Scholar
Davies, I. (1969). The influence of management on tiller development and herbage growth. Technical Bulletin No. 3, Welsh Plant Breeding Station.Google Scholar
Davies, I. (1976 a). Developmental characteristics of grass varieties in relation to their herbage production. 1. An analysis of high-digestibility varieties of Dactylis glomerata at three stages of development. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 87, 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, I. (1976 b). Developmental characteristics of grass varieties in relation to their herbage production. 2. Spring defoliation of Dactylis glomerata: the fate of reproductive tillers which are cut, but whose stem apex is retained. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 87, 33–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deintum, B. (1966). Influence of some climatological factors on the chemical composition and feeding value of herbage. Proceedings 10th International Grassland Congress, Helsinki, pp. 415–418.Google Scholar
Etter, A. G. (1951). How Kentucky bluegrass grows. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Gardens 38, 293–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grace, J. (1975). Wind damage to vegetation – a commentary. Current Advancesin Plant Science 6, 883–894.Google Scholar
Green, J. O., Corrall, A. J. & Terry, R. A. (1971). Grass species and varieties. Relationships between stage of growth, yield and forage quality. Technical Report 8, Grassland Research Institute, Hurley.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. K. (1975). A comparison of the shorter term grazing potential of Italian and perennial ryegrass. Report of the Welsh Plant Breeding Station for 1974, pp. 50–56.Google Scholar
Johnstone, M. J. & Waite, R. (1965). Studies in the lignification of grasses. 1. Perennial ryegrass (S. 24) and cocksfoot (S. 37). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 64, 211–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, D. I. H., Walters, R. J. K. & Breese, E. L. (1973). The evolution of herbage breeding programmes for improved voluntary intake and other nutritive characteristics. Proceedings 5th General Meeting European Grassland Federation, Uppsala, pp. 111–120.Google Scholar
Minson, D. J. & McLeod, M. N. (1970). The digestibility of temperate and tropical grasses. Proceedings 11th International Grassland Congress, Surfer's Paradise 719–722.Google Scholar
Mitchell, K. J. & Calder, D. M. (1958). The ligh tregime within pastures. New Zealand Journal Agricultural Research 1, 61–68.Google Scholar
Neal-Smith, C. A. (1955). Report on herbage plant exploration in the Mediterranean region. Food and Agriculture Organisation Report, no. 415, 1–39.Google Scholar
Peacock, J. M. (1975). Temperature and leaf growth in Lolium perenne 1. The thermal microclimate: its measurement and relation to crop growth. Journal of Applied Ecology 12, 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinthus, M. I. (1973). Lodging in wheat, barley the phenomenon, its causes and preventative measures. Advances in Agronomy 25 209–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Repley, E. A. & Redman, R. E. (1976). Grassland. In Vegetation and the Atmosphere, vol. 2. Case Studies (ed. Monteith, J. L.), pp. 349–398. Academic Press,Google Scholar
Wilson, J. R. (1976). Variation of leaf characteristics with level of insertion on a grass tiller. 1. Develop- mental rate, chemical composition and dry matter digestibility. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 27, 343–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, J. (1956). Succession of fungi on decaying cocksfoot stems. Pt I. Journal of Ecology 44, 517–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, F. H. & Luti, R. (1962). Experimental studies of the effect of wind on plant growth and anatomy. 1. Zea mays. New Phytologist 61, 56–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar