Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T12:54:57.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of a pharmacological dose of testosterone on growth rate, feed intake and energy metabolism of steers gaining or losing weight on roughage diets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. A. Hunter
R. A. Hunter
Affiliation:
CSIRO, Division of Tropical Animal Production, Tropical Cattle Research Centre, North Rockhampton, Queensland 4702, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effect of a pharmacological dose of testosterone propionate, administered by intramuscular injection, on feed intake, live-weight change and fasting metabolism of steers was determined in two experiments. The first consisted of three growth phases: normal weight-gain on a long-chopped lucerne (Medicago sativa) hay diet ad libitum (8 weeks), live-weight loss on a low-quality pasture (Dichanthium aristatum) hay diet ad libitum (12 weeks) and recovery gain on a lucerne hay diet ad libitum (8 weeks). During normal weight-gain, the testosterone-treated steers had significantly (P < 0·01) higher weight gains than untreated steers (1·48 v. 0·95 kg/day, respectively). Feed intakes and fasting metabolic rates of treated and control steers were not significantly different, being 28·2 and 29·1 g dry matter/kg live weight and 85·6 and 91·0 KJ/kg per day, respectively. The efficiency of feed conversion was significantly (P < 0·01) better in the treated steers (6·7 v. 9·6 feed/kg weight-gain). There was no significant effect of treatment on any of these characters during live-weight loss or recovery gain. The weight changes during these periods were ca. –0·7 kg/day and 1·5 kg/day, respectively. After 12 weeks of severe weight loss, metabolic rate per unit live weight had decreased by 25% compared with that at the start of the weight-loss period.

The second experiment examined the effect of the same dose of intramuscular testosterone propionate on another group of steers fed the low-quality roughage diet during a period of weight loss. Again there was no significant effect of treatment on weight loss, feed intake or fasting metabolism.

It was concluded that the growth response to pharmacological doses of testosterone in well nourished steers was greater than that usually observed in comparisons between bulls and steers, and that testosterone was ineffective when administered to steers losing weight or in recovery gain after severe weight loss.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 112 , Issue 2 , April 1989 , pp. 257 - 263
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, C. M., Probert, C. I. & Bohman, V. R. (1966). Growth rate, feed utilization and body composition of young bulls and steer. Journal of Animal Science 25, 132–137.Google Scholar
Burgess, T. D. & Lamming, G. E. (1960). The effect of diethylstilbestrol, hexoestrol and testosterone on the growth rate and carcass quality of fattening beef steers. Animal Production 2, 93–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Occhio, M. J. & Setchell, P. B. (1984). Pituitary and testicular responses in sexually mature bulls after intravenous injections of graded doses of LH-releasing hormone. Journal of Endocrinology 103, 371–376.Google Scholar
Foot, J. Z. & Tulloh, N. M. (1977). Effects of two paths of live-weight change on the efficiency of feed use and on body composition in Angus steers. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 88, 135–142.Google Scholar
Frisch, J. E. (1987). Physiological reasons for heterosis in growth of Bos indicus × Bos taurus. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 109, 213–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisch, J. E. & Vercoe, J. E. (1984). An analysis of growth of different cattle genotypes reared in different environments. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 103, 137–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galbraith, H. & Topps, J. H. (1981). Effect of hormones on the growth and body composition of animals. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews, Series B 51, 521–539.Google Scholar
Gassner, F. X., Reifenstein, E. C., Algeo, J. W. & Mattox, W. E. (1958). Effects of hormones on growth, fattening and meat production potential of livestock. Recent Progress in Hormone Research 14, 183–210.Google Scholar
Goldstein, A., Aronow, L. & Kalman, S. M. (1974) (Eds). In Principles of Drug Action, 2nd edn, pp. 227–300. John Wiley & Sons: New York.Google Scholar
Hale, D. H. & Oliver, J. (1972). Effect of castrationand vasectomy on male zebus which grazed on veld under two systems of management. South African Journal of Animal Science 2, 27–31.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. A. & Vercoe, J. E. (1987). Reduction of energy requirements of steers fed on low-quality roughage diets using trenbolone acetate. British Journal of Nutrition 58, 477–483.Google Scholar
Marsh, W. H., Fingerhut, B. & Miller, H. (1965). Automated and manual direct methods for the determination of blood urea. Clinical Chemistry 11, 624–627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Kelly, J. C. (1985). Testosterone, feed intake and growth rate in male cattle. Nutrition Reports International 32, 935–942.Google Scholar
Post, T. B., Reich, M. M. & Bindon, B. M. (1987). Characterization of LH and testosterone responses to intramuscular injection of GnRH in tropical post pubertal bulls. Theriogenology 27, 305–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prescott, J. H. D. & Lamming, G. E. (1964). The effects of castration on meat production in cattle, sheep and pigs. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 63, 341–357.Google Scholar
Preston, T. R. & Willis, M. B. (1974). Intensive Beef Production, pp. 319. London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Roche, J. F. & Quirke, J. F. (1986). The effects of steroid hormones and xenobiotics on growth of farm animals. In Control and Manipulation of Animal Growth (ed. Buttery, P. J., Lindsay, D. B. & Haynes, N. B.), pp. 39–51. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Technicon Instruments Corp. (1972). Clinical Method no. 01. New York: Technicon Instruments Corp.Google Scholar
Technicon Instruments Corp. (1974). Technicon Method no.SE4–0030FD4. New York: Technicon Instruments Corp.Google Scholar
Thibier, M. (1976). Diurnal testosterone and 17α-hydroxy progesterone in peripheral plasma of young post-pubertal bulls. Acta Endocrinologica 81, 623–634.Google Scholar
Vercoe, J. E. (1970). The fasting metabolism of Brahman, Africander and Hereford × Shorthorn cattle. British Journal of Nutrition 24, 599–606.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webster, A. J. F., Smith, J. S. & Mollison, G. S. (1977). Prediction of the energy requirements for growth in beef cattle. 3. Body weight and heat production in Hereford × Friesian bulls and steers. Animal Production 24, 237–244.Google Scholar
Williams, C. H. & Twine, J. R. (1967). Determination of nitrogen, sulphur, phosphorus, potassium, sodium, calcium and magnesium in plant material by automatic analysis. CSIRO Division of Plant Industry Technical Paper No. 24.Google Scholar