Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:47:24.546Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of CCC and nitrogen on the growth and yield of the second early potato variety Craig's Royal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. P. M. Gunasena  and
P. M. Harris
H. P. M. Gunasena
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, Reading University
P. M. Harris
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, Reading University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The experiment described here is the second of a series of experiments investigating the effect of the time of application of certain plant nutrients on the growth of the potato crop. In this experiment all combinations of three rates of nitrogen (0, 0·75 and 1·50 cwts nitrogen per acre), two times of application (at planting and at the time of tuber initiation) and two rates of application of CCC (0 and 4 lb/acre applied twice, shortly after emergence) were tested and studied by the technique of growth analysis.

There was a linear relationship between leaf area duration (D)and tuber dry matter yield, D accounting for 95 % of the variation in the latter. The maximum amount of nitrogen accumulated in the leaves (Nmax) was linearly related to D, and accounted for 86 % of the variation in D. This relationship was improved if separate regressions were calculated according to whether CCC had been applied or not. Calculated in this way, the regressions indicated that more nitrogen was required for a given value of D when plants were treated with CCC.

Delaying the application of nitrogen resulted in a considerable improvement in the recovery of fertilizer nitrogen (ammonium nitrate). A heavy dressing of nitrogen at the time of planting did not enable the crop to take up sufficient nitrogen for maximum yield. Because of these factors, delaying the application of nitrogen significantly increased tuber yield at both rates of nitrogen tested.

Increasing the rate of nitrogen and delaying its application tended to increase the proportion of stem in the total dry matter; CCC had the opposite tendency. CCC, however, reduced leaf area and the mean effect of CCC was to reduce tuber yields. While there wore no significant interactions between CCC and nitrogen treatments on final tuber yield, it was observed that CCC slightly increased yield when the highest rate of nitrogen was applied late. Ways are suggested in which CCC may be more effectively used.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 73 , Issue 2 , October 1969 , pp. 245 - 259
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bremner, P. M. & Radley, R. W. (1966). Studies in potato agronomy. II. The effect of variety and time of planting on growth, development and yield. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 66, 253–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremner, P. M. & Taha, M. A. (1966). Studios in potato agronomy. I. Tho effect of variety, seed size and spacing on growth, development and yield. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 66, 241–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, C. F. (1921). Development of tubers in the potato. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. No. 958, 1–27.Google Scholar
Dyson, P. W. (1965). Effect of gibberellic acid and (2 chloro-ethyl) trimethyl ammonium chloride on potato growth and development. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 16, 542–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyson, P. W. & Humphries, E. C. (1966). Modification of growth habit of Majestic potato by growth regulators applied at different times. Ann. appl. Biol. 58, 171–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fellows, H. (1926). Relation of growth in the potato tuber to potato Scab disease. J. agric. Res. 32, 757–81.Google Scholar
Gunasena, H. P. M. & Harris, P. M. (1968). The effect of time to application of nitrogen and potassium on the growth of the 2nd early potato, variety Craig's Royal. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 71, 283–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphries, E. C. (1963). Effect of (2 chloro-ethyl) trimethyl ammonium chloride on plant growth, leaf area and net assimilation rate. Ann. Bot. 27, 517–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humpries, E. C. & Dyson, P. W (1967). Effect of growth regulators, CCC, and B9, on some potato varieties. Ann. appl. Biol. 60, 333–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivins, J. D. (1963). Agronomic management of the potato. In The Growth of the Potato, Proc. 10th Easter School agric. Sci. Univ. Nottm., p. 303, Ed. Ivins, J. D. and Milthorpe, F. L.. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Ivins, J. D. (1967). Crop behaviour. J. B. agric. Soc. 128, 159–69.Google Scholar
Ivins, J. D. & Bremner, P. M. (1965). Growth, development and yield in the potato. Outl. Agric. 4, 211–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, F. F. (1936). A soil survey of the University Farm, Sonning, Berks., p. 14–16.Google Scholar
Milthorpe, F. L. & Moorby, J. (1966). The Growth of the Potato. Proc. 3rd Trienn. Conf. Eur. Ass. Potato Res. Zurich, 51–70.Google Scholar
Plaut, Z., Halevy, H. A. & Shmueli, E. (1904). The effect of growth-retarding chemicals on growth and transpiration of bean plants grown under various irrigation regimes. Israel J. agric. Res. 14, 153–8.Google Scholar
Radley, R. W. (1963). The effect of season on growth and development of the potato. In The Growth of the Potato. Proc. 10th Easter School agric. Sci. Univ. Nottm., p. 211, Ed. Ivins, J. D. and Milthorpe, F. L.. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Smith, O. (1931). Study of growth and development in the potato. Proc. Am. Soc. hort. Sci., 28, 279–84.Google Scholar