Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T03:12:17.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of management and age of ploughed out grass–clover on forage maize yield and residual soil nitrogen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2018

M. Cougnon Open the ORCID record for M. Cougnon [Opens in a new window] ,
K. Van Den Berge ,
T. D'Hose ,
L. Clement  and
D. Reheul
M. Cougnon*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Proefhoevestraat 22, 9090 Melle, Belgium
K. Van Den Berge
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281 (S9), Belgium Bioinformatics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
T. D'Hose
Affiliation:
Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO), Plant Sciences Unit, Crop Husbandry and Environment, Burg. Van Gansberghelaan 109, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
L. Clement
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281 (S9), Belgium Bioinformatics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
D. Reheul
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Proefhoevestraat 22, 9090 Melle, Belgium
*
Author for correspondence: M. Cougnon, E-mail: mathias.cougnon@ugent.be
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Forage maize (Zea mays L.) is often grown year after year on the same land on many intensive dairy farms in north-west Europe. This results in agronomical problems such as weed resistance and decline of soil quality, which may be solved by ley-arable farming. In the current study, forage maize was grown at different nitrogen (N) fertilization levels for 3 years on permanent arable land and on temporary arable land after ploughing out different types of grass–clover swards. Swards differed in management (grazing or cutting) and age (temporary or permanent). Maize yield and soil residual mineral N content were measured after the maize harvest. There was no effect on maize yield of the management of ploughed-out grass–clover swards but a clear effect of the age of grass–clover swards. The N fertilizer replacement value (NFRV) of all ploughed grass–clover swards was >170 kg N/ha in the first year after ploughing. In the third year after ploughing, NFRV of the permanent sward still exceeded 200 kg N/ha, whereas that of the temporary swards decreased to 30 kg N/ha on average. Soil residual nitrate (NO3−) remained below the local, legal threshold of 90 kg NO3− N/ha except for the ploughed-out permanent sward in the third year after ploughing (166 kg NO3− N/ha). The current study highlights the potential of forage maize – ley rotations in saving fertilizer N. This is beneficial both for the environment and for the profitability of dairy production in north-western Europe.

Keywords

Cloverley-arablenitratesoil organic matter
Type
Crops and Soils Research Paper
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 156 , Issue 6 , August 2018 , pp. 748 - 757
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Borrelli, L, Castelli, F, Ceotto, E, Cabassi, G and Tomasoni, C (2014) Maize grain and silage yield and yield stability in a long-term cropping system experiment in Northern Italy. European Journal of Agronomy 55, 12–19.Google Scholar
Bretz, F, Hothorn, T and Westfall, P (2010) Multiple Comparisons Using R. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Cerrato, ME and Blackmer, AM (1990) Comparison of models for describing corn yield response to nitrogen fertilizer. Agronomy Journal 82, 138–143.Google Scholar
Christensen, BT, Rasmussen, J, Eriksen, J and Hansen, EM (2009) Soil carbon storage and yields of spring barley following grass leys of different age. European Journal of Agronomy 31, 29–35.Google Scholar
Claerhout, S, Reheul, D and De Cauwer, B (2015) Sensitivity of Echinochloa crus - galli populations to maize herbicides: a comparison between cropping systems. Weed Research 55, 471–481.Google Scholar
De Cauwer, B, Rombaut, R, Bulcke, R and Reheul, D (2012) Differential sensitivity of Echinochloa muricata and Echinochloa crus - galli to 4-hydroxyphenyl pyruvate dioxygenase- and acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicides in maize. Weed Research 52, 500–509.Google Scholar
D'Haene, K, Salomez, J, De Neve, S, De Waele, J and Hofman, G (2014) Environmental performance of nitrogen fertiliser limits imposed by the EU Nitrates Directive. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 192, 67–79.Google Scholar
Djurhuus, J and Olsen, P (1997) Nitrate leaching after cut grass/clover leys as affected by time of ploughing. Soil Use and Management 13, 61–67.Google Scholar
Eriksen, J (2001) Nitrate leaching and growth of cereal crops following cultivation of contrasting temporary grasslands. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 136, 271–281.Google Scholar
Eriksen, J, Pedersen, L and Jørgensen, JR (2006) Nitrate leaching and bread-making quality of spring wheat following cultivation of different grasslands. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 116, 165–175.Google Scholar
Eriksen, J, Askegaard, M and Søegaard, K (2008) Residual effect and nitrate leaching in grass-arable rotations: effect of grassland proportion, sward type and fertilizer history. Soil Use and Management 24, 373–382.Google Scholar
Eriksen, J, Ledgard, S, Lou, J, Schils, R and Rasmussen, J (2010) Environmental impacts of grazed pastures. Grassland Science in Europe 15, 880–890.Google Scholar
Flemish Land Agency (2015) Standards and Directives for N and P Fertilization. Brussels, Belgium: VLM. Available at https://www.vlm.be/nl/SiteCollectionDocuments/Publicaties/mestbank/Normen_en_richtwaarden_2015.pdf (Accessed 29 November 2017).Google Scholar
Franzluebbers, AJ, Sawchik, J and Taboada, MA (2014) Agronomic and environmental impacts of pasture–crop rotations in temperate North and South America. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 190, 18–26.Google Scholar
Goidts, E and Van Wesemael, B (2007) regional assessment of soil organic carbon changes under agriculture in Southern Belgium (1955–2005). Geoderma 141, 341–354.Google Scholar
Hansen, JP, Eriksen, J and Jensen, LS (2005) Residual nitrogen effect of a dairy crop rotation as influenced by grass-clover ley management, manure type and age. Soil Use and Management 21, 278–286.Google Scholar
Hansen, EM, Eriksen, J and Vinther, FP (2007) Catch crop strategy and nitrate leaching following grazed grass-clover. Soil Use and Management 23, 348–358.Google Scholar
Johnston, AE, McEwen, J, Lane, PW, Hewitt, MV, Poulton, PR and Yeoman, DP (1994) Effects of one to six year old ryegrass-clover leys on soil nitrogen and on the subsequent yields and fertilizer nitrogen requirements of the arable sequence winter wheat, potatoes, winter wheat, winter beans (Vicia faba) grown on a sandy loam soil. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 122, 73–89.Google Scholar
Kayser, M, Seidel, K, Müller, J and Isselstein, J (2008) The effect of succeeding crop and level of N fertilization on N leaching after break-up of grassland. European Journal of Agronomy 29, 200–207.Google Scholar
Lory, JA, Russelle, MP and Peterson, TA (1995) A comparison of two nitrogen credit methods: traditional vs. difference. Agronomy Journal 87, 648–651.Google Scholar
Nevens, F and Reheul, D (2001) Crop rotation versus monoculture; yield, N yield and ear fraction of silage maize at different levels of mineral N fertilization. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 49, 405–425.Google Scholar
Nevens, F and Reheul, D (2002) The nitrogen-and non-nitrogen-contribution effect of ploughed grass leys on the following arable forage crops: determination and optimum use. European Journal of Agronomy 16, 57–74.Google Scholar
Piutti, S, Romillac, N, Chanseaume, A, Slezack-Deschaumes, S, Manneville, V and Amiaud, B (2015) Enjeux et contributions des prairies temporaires pour améliorer la fertilité des sols. Fourrages 223, 179–188.Google Scholar
R Core Team (2013) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Seidel, K, Kayser, M and Isselstein, J (2004) Nitrate leaching from reseeded grassland: the effect of season, technique of renewal and former N fertilisation. Grassland Science in Europe 9, 349–351.Google Scholar
Sleutel, S, De Neve, S, Hofman, G, Boeckx, P, Beheydt, D, Van Cleemput, O, Mestdagh, I, Lootens, P, Carlier, L, Van Camp, N, Verbeeck, H, Vande Walle, I, Samson, R, Lust, N and Lemeur, R (2003) Carbon stock changes and carbon sequestration potential of Flemish cropland soils. Global Change Biology 9, 1193–1203.Google Scholar
Sleutel, S, De Neve, S, Singier, B and Hofman, G (2006) Organic C levels in intensively managed arable soils – long-term regional trends and characterization of fractions. Soil Use and Management 22, 188–196.Google Scholar
Van Den Pol-van Dasselaar, A, Aarts, HFM, De Caesteker, E, De Vliegher, A, Elgersma, A, Reheul, D, Reijneveld, JA, Vaes, R and Verloop, J (2015) Grassland and forages in high output dairy farming systems in Flanders and the Netherlands. Grassland Science in Europe 20, 3–11.Google Scholar
Van der Straeten, B and Deuninck, J (2016) Agronomic Value of Crops (In Dutch: Landbouwkundige Waardering van Gewassen). Brussels, Belgium: Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries of the Flemish Government.Google Scholar
Van Eekeren, N, Bommelé, L, Bloem, J, Schouten, T, Rutgers, M, de Goede, R, Reheul, D and Brussaard, L (2008) Soil biological quality after 36 years of ley-arable cropping, permanent grassland and permanent arable cropping. Applied Soil Ecology 40, 432–446.Google Scholar
Verloop, J, Boumans, LJM, Van Keulen, H, Oenema, J, Hilhorst, GJ, Aarts, HFM and Sebek, LBJ (2006) Reducing nitrate leaching to groundwater in an intensive dairy farming system. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 74, 59–74.Google Scholar
Vertès, F, Hatch, D, Velthof, G, Taube, F, Laurent, F, Loiseau, P and Recous, S (2007) Short-term and cumulative effects of grassland cultivation on nitrogen and carbon cycling in ley-arable rotations. Grassland Science in Europe 12, 227–246.Google Scholar
Vertès, F, Jeuffroy, M, Louarn, G, Voisin, A and Justes, E (2015) Légumineuses et prairies temporaires: des fournitures d'azote pour les rotations. Fourrages 223, 221–232.Google Scholar
Vinther, FP (1998) Biological nitrogen fixation in grass–clover affected by animal excreta. Plant and Soil 203, 207–215.Google Scholar
Vos, J and Van Der Putten, PEL (1997) Field observations on nitrogen catch crops. I. Potential and actual growth and nitrogen accumulation in relation to sowing date and crop species. Plant and Soil 195, 299–309.Google Scholar
Webster, CP, Poulton, PR and Goulding, KWT (1999) Nitrogen leaching from winter cereals grown as part of a 5-year ley–arable rotation. European Journal of Agronomy 10, 99–109.Google Scholar