Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:33:47.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of nitrogen fertilizer on yield and nitrogen concentration in grain and straw of rice under semi-deepwater conditions (51–100 cm)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. D. Reddy
Affiliation:
Agronomy Division, Central Rice Research Institute, Cuttack 753006, India
M. M. Panda
Affiliation:
Agronomy Division, Central Rice Research Institute, Cuttack 753006, India
B. C. Ghosh
Affiliation:
Agronomy Division, Central Rice Research Institute, Cuttack 753006, India
B. B. Reddy
Affiliation:
Agronomy Division, Central Rice Research Institute, Cuttack 753006, India

Summary

Under conditions of semi-deep water (51–100 cm) rice varieties with greater plant height produced more dry matter and grain yield as N fertilizer was increased from 0 to 20 and 40 kg/ha. The varieties which performed better in a situation of slow rise in water level to a depth of 120 cm could not survive a quick rise in water level owing to their lesser plant height and elongation ability. The loss of dry matter (dead and dried leaves) was also greater in varieties susceptible to deep water than varieties tolerant of deep water.

With the increase in N fertilizer, there was increase in plant height, number of tillers, dry-matter production and grain yield. The loss of dry matter was less in crops given N fertilizer than in those not given N fertilizer. The varieties capable of producing higher grain yield in response to N fertilizer under semi-deep water did not improve their grain yield under intermediate deep water (15–50 cm). With increase in application of N fertilizer from 0 to 40 kg/ha the N concentration in grain increased. N concentration did not vary in straw under intermediate deep water, there was no definite trend in semi-deep water, and it was higher under conditions of semi-deep than intermediate deep water.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alim, A., Zaman, S. M. H., Sen, J. L., Ullah, M. T. & Chowdhury, M. A. (1962). Review of Half a Century of Rice Research in East Pakistan, 199 pp. Dacca: Government of East Pakistan.Google Scholar
Borthakur, D. N. (1971). Deepwater rice problems and lines of solution. Indian Farming 21 (9), 3344.Google Scholar
Central Rice Research Institute (1981, 1982). Annual Reports for 1981 and 1982. India: Indian Council of Agricultural Research.Google Scholar
Chinda, M., Kupkanchanakul, K., Hirunyupakorn, V. & Chang, S. C. (1971). An investigation on the response to fertilizers of deepwater rice: results of 1971. FAO UNDP/SF Soil Fertility Research Project, 9 pp.Google Scholar
Hilleris Lambers, D. H. & Seshu, D. V. (1982). Some ideas on breeding procedures and requirements for deepwater rice improvement. Proceedings of the 1981 International Deeptvater Rice Workshop, pp. 2944. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
Hirunyupakorn, V. (1971). Effects of pre-submergence, sowing-weeding practices and nitrogen on the yield of deepwater rice. Annual Research Report Rice Fertilization Experiments, pp. 151153. Soil fertility branch technical division, Thailand, Department of Agriculture, Rice Department.Google Scholar
Huke, R. E. (1982). Rice Area by Type of Culture: South, South-east and East Asia, 32 pp. Los Baños, Philippines. International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. L. (1967). Soil Chemical Analysis. New Delhi, India: Prentice Hall of India Ltd.Google Scholar
Khan, M. R. & Vergara, B. S. (1981). Response of traditional deepwater rice to nitrogen application. International Rice Research Newsletter 6 (3), 1011.Google Scholar
Kupkanchanakul, T. & Vergara, B. S. (1980). Nitrogen response of rice grown in medium deepwater. Thai Journal of Agricultural Sciences 13, 213225.Google Scholar
Kupkanchanakul, T., Vergara, B. S. & Kupkanchanakul, K. (1982). Effect of agronomic practices on tillering and yield of deepwater rice. Proceedings of the 1981 International Deepwater Rice Workshop, pp. 373386. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
Pande, H. K. (1984). Prospects of rainfed lowland rice production in India by 2000 A.D. Central Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, India, 51 pp. (mimeo).Google Scholar
Pande, H. K. & Reddy, M. D. (1984). Fertilizer use efficiency and water management in rice. Fertiliser News 29 (4), 1726.Google Scholar
Reddy, B. B., Reddy, M. D. & Ghosh, B. C. (1982). Soil fertility and fertilizer management for rainfed lowland rice. In Report of the Task Force Meeting on Rainfed Lowland Rice. Patna: Agriculture Research Institute.Google Scholar
Reddy, M. D., Ghosh, B. C. & Panda, M. M. (1986). Effect of seed rate and application of N fertilizer on grain yield and N uptake of rice under intermediate deepwater conditions (15–50 cm). Journal of Agricultural Science 107, 6166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, M. D. & Mittra, B. N. (1985). Response of rice to different forms of urea and phosphorus fertilization under intermediate deepwater conditions (15–50 cm). Plant and Soil 84, 431435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vergara, B. S., Mazaredo, A., De Datta, S. K., Abilay, W. & Setbutara, C. (1975). Some plant characters associated with floating rice and their possible improvement for higher grain yield. Proceedings of the International Seminar on Deepwater Rice, pp. 102108. Dacca: Bangladesh Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar