Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T20:34:10.430Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of pod removal and plant growth regulators on the growth, development and carbon assimilate distribution in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. R. Keiller  and
D. G. Morgan
D. R. Keiller
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Biology, University of Cambridge, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3DX
D. G. Morgan
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Biology, University of Cambridge, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3DX
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Removal of basally positioned pods on the terminal inflorescence at anthesis and 6 days thereafter increased the duration of flowering and resulted in the formation of a larger number of smaller pods.

Removal at 12 days after anthesis did not affect flower production but increased the number of flowers setting pods. Application of benzyladenine to the apices of intact plants from 8 days but not 14 days after anthesis greatly extended flower but not pod production. Liquid scintillation counting showed that the benzyladenine treatment led to more 14C-labelled assimilates moving to the apices.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 111 , Issue 2 , October 1988 , pp. 357 - 362
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Binne, R. C. & Clifford, P. E. (1981). Flower and pod production in Phaseolus vulgaris. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 97, 397–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, J. C., Al-Shalan, I. & Carlson, R. M. (1973). Abscission of Pistachio inflorescence buds as influenced by leaf area and number of nuts. Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science 98, 591–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durand, B. & Louis, J. P. (1974). Male sterility and cytokinins and cytokinin action in Mercurialis Annua L. (2n = 16). In Fertilization of Higher Plants (ed. Linskens, H. F.), pp. 327–334. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Foss, R. A. (1977). The indentification of selection criteria to be used in breeding Brassica juncea cv. Coss and Cern for improved yield. Ph.D. thesis, Univeristy of Reading.Google Scholar
Hardman, L. L. & Brun, W. A. (1971). Effect of atmospheric CO2 enrichment at different developmental stages on growth and yield components of soybeans. Crop Science 11, 886–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huff, A. & Dybing, C. D. (1980). Factors affecting the shedding of flowers in soybean (Glycine max. L. cv. Marl.) Journal of Experimental Botany 31, 751–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffcoat, B. (1977). Influence of the cytokinin, 6-benzylamino-9-(tetrahydropyran-2-yl)-9H-purine on the growth and development of some ornamental crops. Journal of Horticultural Science 52, 143–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jong, A. W. De & Bruinsma, J. (1974 a). Pistil development in Cleome flowers. III. Effects of growth regulating substances on flower buds of Cleome iberidella cv. Welv. ex Oliv. grown in vitro. Zeitschrift fiir Pflanzenphysiologie 73, 142–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jong, A. W. de & Bruinsma, J. (1974 b). Pistil development in Cleome flowers. IV. Effects of growth-regulating substances on female abortion in Cleome spinosca cv. Jacq. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenphysiologie 73, 152–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keiller, D. R. & Morgan, D. G. (1988). Distribution of 14carbon-labelled assimilates in flowering plants of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L. ). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 111, 000–000Google Scholar
Kinet, J. M. (1977 a). Effect of light conditions on the development of the inflorescence in tomato. Scienlia Horticultura 6, 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinet, J. M. (1977 b). Effect of defoliation and growth substances on the development of the inflorescence in tomato. Scienlia Horticultura 6, 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinet, J. M., Hurdebise, D., Parmentier, A.& Steiner, R. (1978). Promotion of inflorescence development by growth substance treatments to tomato plants grown in insufficient light conditions. Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science 103, 724–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, M. (1981). Etude du rule des cytokinines, des gibberellines et de la distribution des 14C assimilates dans le développement de l'inflorescence de la tomate (Lycopersicon esculentum M. 11). Ph.D. thesis, Universitié de Liège.Google Scholar
Lockhart, J. A. & Gottschall, V. (1961). Fruit induced and apical senescence in Pisum sativum L. Plant Physiology 36, 389–398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ojehomon, O. O. (1970). Effect of continuous removal of open flowers on the seed yield of cowpea. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 74, 375–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ojehomon, O. O. (1972). Fruit abscission in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) Journal of Experimental Botany, 23, 751–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreyer, S. L. & Noodén, L. D. (1975 a). Proceedings of the Botanical Society of America, p. 14. As cited by Noodén, L. D. & Leopold, A. C. (1978). Phytohormones and the endogenous regulation of senescence and abscission. In Phytohormones and Related Compounds: a Comprehensive Treatise, Vol. I, Phytohormes and the Development of Higher Plants, (ed. D. S. Letham, P. B. Goodwin and T. J. V. Higgins), pp. 329–369. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical Press.Google Scholar
Schreyer, S. L. & Noodén, L. D. (1975 b). Screening nutrients and growth promotors or inhibitors for ability to mimic or antagonise the death signal in soybeans. Plant Physiology 56, (Suppl.), 83–87.Google Scholar
Tayo, T. O. (1980). Compensatory growth and yield of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) following pod removal at different stages of reproductive growth. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95, 487–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tayo, T. O. & Morgan, D. G. (1979). Factors influencing flower and pod development in oilseed rape. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 363–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Steveninck, R. F. M. (1957). Factors affecting the abscission of reproductive organs in yellow lupins (Lupinus luteus L.). I. Effects of different patterns of flower removal. Journal of Experimental Biology 8, 373–381.Google Scholar
Vanh Steveninck, R. F. M. (1958). Factors affecting the abscission of reproductive organs in yellow lupins (Lupinus luteus L.). II. The effects of growth substances, defoliation and removal of lateral growth. Journal of Experimental Botany 9, 372–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Steveninck, R. F. M. (1959). Factors affecting the abscission of reproductive organs in yellow lupin (Lupinus luteus L.). III. Endogenous growth substances in virus infected and healthy plants and their effect on abscission. Journal of Experimental Botany 10, 367–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, I. H. & Free, J. B. (1979). Compensation of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) after damage to buds and pods. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 53–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar