Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:33:27.783Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of some pesticides and herbicides on the rumen micro-organisms of sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. R. Abou Akkada
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, University of AlexandriaAlexandria, Egypt
M. A. Hassan
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, University of AlexandriaAlexandria, Egypt
M. A. Naga
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, University of AlexandriaAlexandria, Egypt

Summary

Lower concentrations of the herbicide M15 stimulated the in vitro cellulose digestion and V.F.A. production by rumen micro-organisms. The herbicide Cotoran enhanced cellulose digestion but had no effect on V.F.A. production. The herbicide Dalapon decreased cellulose digestion and had little effect on V.F.A. concentrations. The herbicide 2,4·D had little or no effect on the in vitro cellulose digestion and V.F.A. production. The in vitro microbial activity was inhibited by the pesticide DDT. The effects of M15 2,4·D and DDT on V.F.A. production decreased with time. When the rumen fluid was fractionated, the V.F.A. production by the bacterial fraction was not significantly altered by the addition of 2,4·D and M15, whereas the activity of protozoal fraction was greatly enhanced. The response of V.F.A. production by washed suspensions of rumen ciliate protozoa to the addition of pesticides and herbicides was remarkably similar to that of rumen contents. Feeding M15 (60 ppm) increased the ruminal V.F.A. over those in the control sheep whereas 2,4·D had no or little effect.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abou Akkada, A. R. & Howard, B. H. (1960). The biochemistry of rumen protozoa. 3. The carbohydrate metabolism of Entodinium. Biochem. J. 76, 445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abou Akkada, A. R., Eadie, J. M. & Howard, B. H. (1963). The biochemistry of rumen protozoa. 7. The carbohydrases of Polyplastron multiyesiculatum. Biochem. J. 89, 268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belasco, I. J. (1954 a). Comparison of urea and protein meals as nitrogen sources for rumen micro-organisms. Urea utilization and cellulose digestion. J. Anim. Sci. 13, 739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belasco, I. J. (1954 b). Comparisons of urea and protein meals as nitrogen sources for rumen micro-organisms: the production of volatile fatty acids. J. Anim. Sci. 13, 748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, T. H. & Hobson, P. N. (1960). Protolysis in the sheep rumen by whole and fractionated rumen contents. J. gen. Microbiol. 22, 272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, M. P. & Robinson, I. M. (1961). Studies on the nitrogen requirements of some ruminal cellulolytic bacteria. Appl. Microbiol. 9, 96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conner, R. L., Wagtendonk, W. J. & Miller, C. A. (1953). The isolation from lemon juice of a growth factor of steroid nature required for the growth of a strain of Paramecium aurelia. J. gen. Microbiol. 9, 434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, J. W. (1957). In vitro destruction of some organophosphate pesticides of bovine rumen fluid. J. agric. Fd Chem. 5, 859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crampton, E. W. & Maynard, L. A. (1938). The relation of cellulose and lignin content to the nutritive value of animal feeds. J. Nutr. 15, 383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, E. C., Young, E. J., Younger, R. L., Hunt, L. M. & McLaren, J. K. (1964). The fate of 2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid in sheep. J. agric. Fd Chem. 12, 43.Google Scholar
Eadie, J. M. (1967). Studies on the ecology of certain rumen ciliate protozoa. J. gen. Microbiol. 49, 175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fries, G. F., Flott, W. P. & Moore, L. A. (1969). Energy balance and excretion of DDT into milk. J. Dairy Sci. 52, 684.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lowrey, R. S., Bowman, M. C. & Knox, E. E. (1969). Effect of Bedrin on the metabolism of dietary components by the bovine. J. Dairy Sci. 52, 1460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moir, R. J. & Harris, L. E. (1962). Ruminal flora studies in the sheep; influence of nitrogen intake upon ruminal function. J. Nutr. 77, 285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El-Shazly, K., Abou Akkada, A. R. & Naga, M. A. (1963). The use of the in vitro fermentation technique to estimate the digestible energy content of some Egyptian forages. II. The in vitro production of total volatile fatty acids and organic acids as criteria of energy content. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 61, 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shehata, M. N., El-Shazly, K. & Abou Akkada, A. R. (1971). Effect of Diethylstilbestrol (DES) on the digestibility coefficients and ruminal activity of sheep. 4th Conf. Anim. Prod., Alexandria, Egypt.Google Scholar
Stewart, W. E. & Schultz, L. H. (1958). In vitro volatile fatty acids production from various feeds by bovine rumen micro-organisms. J. Anim. Sci. 17, 737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, P. P., Robbins, J. D., Guttierrez, J. & Davis, R. E. (1963). Rumen, bacterial and protozoal responses to insecticide substrates. Appl. Microbiol. 11, 517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed