Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T12:12:34.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of an intensified human–animal interaction on tail biting in pigs during the rearing period

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2018

Kathrin Büttner ,
Irena Czycholl ,
Heidi Basler  and
Joachim Krieter
Kathrin Büttner*
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Breeding and Husbandry, Christian-Albrechts-University, Olshausenstr. 40, D-24098 Kiel, Germany
Irena Czycholl
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Breeding and Husbandry, Christian-Albrechts-University, Olshausenstr. 40, D-24098 Kiel, Germany
Heidi Basler
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Breeding and Husbandry, Christian-Albrechts-University, Olshausenstr. 40, D-24098 Kiel, Germany
Joachim Krieter
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Breeding and Husbandry, Christian-Albrechts-University, Olshausenstr. 40, D-24098 Kiel, Germany
*
Author for correspondence: Kathrin Büttner, E-mail: kbuettner@tierzucht.uni-kiel.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Tail biting in pigs is a serious welfare problem with multifactorial causes. Several risk factors are described in the literature ranging from environmental factors including stocking densities, deficiencies in feed quality or accessibility, to internal factors such as poor health status, genetics or sex. Also, the human–animal relationship can have an effect on behaviour and performance of the animals. Thus, the aim of the current study was to evaluate whether intensified human–animal interaction in the rearing period can reduce the occurrence of tail biting in weaned piglets. For this, two treatment groups were established. The trial group differed only in intensified human–animal interaction (e.g. calm speech, petting, food provision) from the control group, which was carried out three times a week by one person for 15 min in each pen. Once a week the animals’ tails were scored regarding tail lesions and losses and a human approach test was performed. The intensified human–animal interaction influenced the animals’ behaviour towards the human as well as towards their pen mates. The trial group showed significantly better results compared with the control group, i.e. fewer tail lesions and more animals with intact tails. Also, the results of the human approach test in the trial group showed a lower latency to approach compared with the control group. Thus, integration of an intensified human–animal interaction into the daily practice of pig farms could be one possibility for enhancing the human–animal relationship and reducing occurrence of tail biting.

Keywords

Animal welfareintensified human–animal interactionpigtail biting
Type
Animal Research Paper
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 156 , Issue 8 , October 2018 , pp. 1039 - 1046
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abriel, M and Jais, C (2013) Influence of housing conditions on the appearance of cannibalism in weaning piglets. Landtechnik 68, 389–394.Google Scholar
Abriel, M, Jais, C and Bernhardt, H (2014) Influence of pen design and space allowance on tail biting in weaning piglets. Landtechnik 69, 308–314.Google Scholar
Andersen, IL, Berg, S, Bøe, KE and Edwards, S (2006) Positive handling in late pregnancy and the consequences for maternal behaviour and production in sows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 99, 64–76.Google Scholar
Anonymous (2016) Deutscher Schweine Boniturschlüssel (DSBS). Riems, Germany: Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut. Available at https://www.fli.de/fileadmin/FLI/ITT/Deutscher_Schweine_Boniturschluessel_2016-06-30_de.pdf (Accessed 6 November 2018).Google Scholar
Blackshaw, JK (1981) Some behavioural deviations in weaned domestic pigs: persistent inguinal nose thrusting, and tail and ear biting. Animal Science 33, 325–332.Google Scholar
Blokhuis, HJ, Nunes Pina, T, Bracke, MBM, Sanaa, M, Edwards, SA, Gunn, M, Martineau, GP, Mendl, M and Prunier, A (2007) Scientific report on the risks associated with tail biting in pigs and possible means to reduce the need for tail docking considering the different housing and husbandry systems (Question number: EFSA-Q-2006-013). EFSA Journal 611, 1–13.Google Scholar
Bracke, MBM, Hulsegge, B, Keeling, L and Blokhuis, HJ (2004 a) Decision support system with semantic model to assess the risk of tail biting in pigs. 1: modelling. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 87, 31–44.Google Scholar
Bracke, MB, Hulsegge, B, Keeling, L and Blokhuis, HJ (2004 b) Decision support system with semantic model to assess the risk of tail biting in pigs. 2: validation. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 87, 45–54.Google Scholar
Breuer, K, Sutcliffe, MEM, Mercer, JT, Rance, KA, Beattie, VE, Sneddon, IA and Edwards, SA (2003) The effect of breed on the development of adverse social behaviours in pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 84, 59–74.Google Scholar
Brown, JA, Dewey, C, Delange, CFM, Mandell, IB, Purslow, PP, Robinson, JA, Squires, EJ and Widowski, TM (2009) Reliability of temperament tests on finishing pigs in group-housing and comparison to social tests. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 118, 28–35.Google Scholar
Brunberg, E, Wallenbeck, A and Keeling, LJ (2011) Tail biting in fattening pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 133, 18–25.Google Scholar
Chaloupková, H, Illmann, G, Neuhauserová, K, Tománek, M and Vališ, L (2007) Preweaning housing effects on behavior and physiological measures in pigs during the suckling and fattening periods. Journal of Animal Science 85, 1741–1749.Google Scholar
Day, JEL, Spoolder, HAM, Burfoot, A, Chamberlain, HL and Edwards, SA (2002 a) The separate and interactive effects of handling and environmental enrichment on the behaviour and welfare of growing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 75, 177–192.Google Scholar
Day, JEL, Burfoot, A, Docking, CM, Whittaker, X, Spoolder, HAM and Edwards, SA (2002 b) The effects of prior experience of straw and the level of straw provision on the behaviour of growing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 76, 189–202.Google Scholar
de Oliveira, D, Paranhos da Costa, MJR, Zupan, M, Rehn, T and Keeling, LJ (2015) Early human handling in non-weaned piglets. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 164, 56–63.Google Scholar
Edwards, S (2011) What do we know about tail biting today? The Pig Journal 66, 81–86.Google Scholar
Fraser, D, Phillips, PA, Thompson, BK and Tennessen, T (1991) Effect of straw on the behaviour of growing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 30, 307–318.Google Scholar
Grandin, T and Shivley, C (2015) How farm animals react and perceive stressful situations such as handling, restraint, and transport. Animals 5, 1233–1251.Google Scholar
Hemsworth, PH and Barnett, JL (1991) The effects of aversively handling pigs, either individually or in groups, on their behaviour, growth and corticosteroids. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 30, 61–72.Google Scholar
Hemsworth, PH and Barnett, JL (1992) The effects of early contact with humans on the subsequent level of fear of humans in pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 35, 83–90.Google Scholar
Hemsworth, PH, Barnett, JL and Hansen, C (1986) The influence of handling by humans on the behaviour, reproduction and corticosteroids of male and female pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 15, 303–314.Google Scholar
Holling, C, Tölle, K-H, Otto, G and Blaha, T (2016) Keeping pigs with undocked tails on conventionally producing farms. Tierärztliche Praxis. Ausgabe G, Grosstiere/Nutztiere 44, 296–306.Google Scholar
Holm, S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6, 65–70.Google Scholar
Hötzel, MJ, de Souza, GPP, Costa, OAD and Machado Filho, LCP (2011) Disentangling the effects of weaning stressors on piglets’ behaviour and feed intake. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 135, 44–50.Google Scholar
Hunter, EJ, Jones, TA, Guise, HJ, Penny, RHC and Hoste, S (2001) The relationship between tail biting in pigs, docking procedure and other management practices. Veterinary Journal 161, 72–79.Google Scholar
Hurvich, CM and Tsai, C-L (1989) Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika 76, 297–307.Google Scholar
Janczak, AM, Pedersen, LJ and Bakken, M (2003) Aggression, fearfulness and coping styles in female pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 81, 13–28.Google Scholar
Jones, RB and Waddington, D (1993) Attenuation of the domestic chick's fear of human beings via regular handling: in search of a sensitive period. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 36, 185–195.Google Scholar
Keeling, LJ, Wallenbeck, A, Larsen, A and Holmgren, N (2012) Scoring tail damage in pigs: an evaluation based on recordings at Swedish slaughterhouses. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 54, article no. 32, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-54-32.Google Scholar
Kritas, SK and Morrison, RB (2004) An observational study on tail biting in commercial grower-finisher barns. Journal of Swine Health and Production 12, 17–22.Google Scholar
Lallès, J-P, Bosi, P, Smidt, H and Stokes, CR (2007) Weaning – a challenge to gut physiologists. Livestock Science 108, 82–93.Google Scholar
Lay, DC Jr, Matteri, RL, Carroll, JA, Fangman, TJ and Safranski, TJ (2002) Preweaning survival in swine. Journal of Animal Science 80(E-suppl 1), E74–E86.Google Scholar
Moinard, C, Mendl, M, Nicol, CJ and Green, LE (2003) A case control study of on-farm risk factors for tail biting in pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 81, 333–355.Google Scholar
Muns, R, Rault, J-L and Hemsworth, P (2015) Positive human contact on the first day of life alters the piglet's behavioural response to humans and husbandry practices. Physiology and Behavior 151, 162–167.Google Scholar
Pajor, EA, Rushen, J and de Passillé, AM (2000) Aversion learning techniques to evaluate dairy cattle handling practices. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 69, 89–102.Google Scholar
Rault, J-L, Lay, DC and Marchant-Forde, JN (2011) Castration induced pain in pigs and other livestock. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 135, 214–225.Google Scholar
Reimert, I, Rodenburg, TB, Ursinus, WW, Duijvesteijn, N, Camerlink, I, Kemp, B and Bolhuis, JE (2013) Backtest and novelty behavior of female and castrated male piglets, with diverging social breeding values for growth. Journal of Animal Science 91, 4589–4597.Google Scholar
SAS® Institute Inc (2013) User's Guide (Release 9.4). Cary, North Carolina, USA: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Scheffler, K, Stamer, E, Traulsen, I and Krieter, J (2014 a) Genetic analysis of the individual pig behaviour in backtests and human approach tests. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 160, 38–45.Google Scholar
Scheffler, K, Traulsen, I and Krieter, J (2014 b) Characterisation of pigs into different personalities using the behavioural tests backtest and human approach test. Livestock Science 167, 297–304.Google Scholar
Schrøder-Petersen, DL and Simonsen, HB (2001) Tail biting in pigs. Veterinary Journal 162, 196–210.Google Scholar
Schrøder-Petersen, DL, Simonsen, HB and Lawson, LG (2003) Tail-in-mouth behaviour among weaner pigs in relation to age, gender and group composition regarding gender. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A – Animal Science 53, 29–34.Google Scholar
Schwarz, G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics 6, 461–464.Google Scholar
Scollo, A, Di Martino, G, Bonfanti, L, Stefani, AL, Schiavon, E, Marangon, S and Gottardo, F (2013) Tail docking and the rearing of heavy pigs: the role played by gender and the presence of straw in the control of tail biting. Blood parameters, behaviour and skin lesions. Research in Veterinary Science 95, 825–830.Google Scholar
Siegford, JM, Rucker, G and Zanella, AJ (2008) Effects of pre-weaning exposure to a maze on stress responses in pigs at weaning and on subsequent performance in spatial and fear-related tests. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 110, 189–202.Google Scholar
Sinisalo, A, Niemi, JK, Heinonen, M and Valros, A (2012) Tail biting and production performance in fattening pigs. Livestock Science 143, 220–225.Google Scholar
Taylor, NR, Main, DCJ, Mendl, M and Edwards, SA (2010) Tail-biting: a new perspective. Veterinary Journal 186, 137–147.Google Scholar
Taylor, NR, Parker, RMA, Mendl, M, Edwards, SA and Main, DCJ (2012) Prevalence of risk factors for tail biting on commercial farms and intervention strategies. Veterinary Journal 194, 77–83.Google Scholar
Thodberg, K, Jensen, KH and Herskin, MS (1999) A general reaction pattern across situations in prepubertal gilts. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 63, 103–119.Google Scholar
Ursinus, WW, Van Reenen, CG, Reimert, I and Bolhuis, JE (2014) Tail biting in pigs: blood serotonin and fearfulness as pieces of the puzzle? PLoS ONE 9, article no. e107040, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107040.Google Scholar
van Erp-van der Kooij, E, Kuijpers, AH, Schrama, JW, Ekkel, ED and Tielen, MJM (2000) Individual behavioural characteristics in pigs and their impact on production. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 66, 171–185.Google Scholar
van Putten, G (1969) An investigation into tail-biting among fattening pigs. British Veterinary Journal 125, 511–517.Google Scholar
Veit, C, Traulsen, I, Hasler, M, Tölle, K-H, Burfeind, O and grosse Beilage, E (2016) Influence of raw material on the occurrence of tail-biting in undocked pigs. Livestock Science 191, 125–131.Google Scholar
Veit, C, Büttner, K, Traulsen, I, Gertz, M, Hasler, M, Burfeind, O, grosse Beilage, E and Krieter, J (2017) The effect of mixing piglets after weaning on the occurrence of tail-biting during rearing. Livestock Science 201, 70–73.Google Scholar
von Borell, E and Schäffer, D (2009) On-farm evaluation of animal welfare in weaner and fattening pig units based on critical control points. In Aland, A and Madec, F (eds), Sustainable Animal Production: The Challenges and Potential Developments for Professional Farming. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers, pp. 203–213.Google Scholar
Wallgren, P and Lindahl, E (1996) The influence of tail biting on performance of fattening pigs. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 37, 453–460.Google Scholar
Wechsler, B (1995) Coping and coping strategies: a behavioural view. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 43, 123–134.Google Scholar
Zonderland, JJ, Wolthuis-Fillerup, M, van Reenen, CG, Bracke, MBM, Kemp, B, den Hartog, LA and Spoolder, HAM (2008) Prevention and treatment of tail biting in weaned piglets. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 110, 269–281.Google Scholar
Zonderland, JJ, Bracke, MBM, den Hartog, LA, Kemp, B and Spoolder, HAM (2010) Gender effects on tail damage development in single- or mixed-sex groups of weaned piglets. Livestock Science 129, 151–158.Google Scholar
Zonderland, JJ, Kemp, B, Bracke, MBM, den Hartog, LA and Spoolder, HAM (2011) Individual piglets’ contribution to the development of tail biting. Animal 5, 601–607.Google Scholar
Zupan, M and Zanella, AJ (2017) Peripheral regulation of stress and fear responses in pigs from tail-biting pens. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 46, 33–38.Google Scholar