Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:07:20.884Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effects of cattle slurry and inorganic nitrogen fertilizer on the yield and quality of spring barley

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

B. F. Pain
Affiliation:
National Institutefor Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Beading, Berks.
S. J. Richardsonf
Affiliation:
Agricultural Development and Advisory Service Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Coley Park, Reading, Berks.
Rosemary J. Fulford
Affiliation:
National Institutefor Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Beading, Berks.

Summary

In experiments over 3 years (1974–6) cow slurry in the range 0–112·5 t/ha and ammonium nitrate in the range 0–120 kg N/ha were applied to field plots factorially to test the effects on the yield and quality of spring barley grain.

In 1974 slurry application markedly improved the grain yield (cv. Golden Promise) at each rate of inorganic N and increased grain size. Applying N fertilizer with more than 37·5 t slurry/ha reduced grain yield below the maximum. Grain with the highest crude protein content (15·1 %) was obtained from a combination of slurry and inorganic N. The residual effects of the slurry treatments gave satisfactory grain yields in 1975 without additional fertilizer.

Grain yields (cvs Julia and Abacus) in other experiments carried out on a different soil type in 1975 and 1976 were approximately half those obtained in 1974, due in part to drought conditions. The pattern of the results was similar. Heaviest grain yields were harvested from plots receiving 70 t slurry/ha with no additional N.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. (1973). The analysis of agricultural materials. M.A.F.F. Technical Bulletin, no. 27, London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Anon. (1976). Profitable utilisation of livestock manures. M.A.F.F. Short Term Leaflet, no. 171, London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Davies, H. T. (1970). Experiments on the fertilising value of animal slurries. II. The use of pig slurry on spring barley. Experimental Husbandry 19, 61–4.Google Scholar
Lessells, W. J. & Webber, J. (1965). The effect of nitrogen on spring cereals. Experimental Husbandry 12, 6273.Google Scholar
Mcallister, J. S. V. (1970). Relative efficiencies of different N sources for barley in Northern Ireland. Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland 43rd Annual Report, 1969–1970, pp. 23–8.Google Scholar
McIntosh, J. L. & Varney, K. E. (1972). Accumulative effects of manure and nitrogen on continuous corn on clay soil. I. Growth, yield and nutrient uptake. Agronomy Journal 64, 374–9.Google Scholar
Stewart, T. A. (1970 a). Studies on the use of animal slurries to manure barley. 1. The effect of age and dilution of cow and pig slurry when applied at various rates both before and after sowing. Record of Agricultural Research, Ministry of Agriculture of Northern Ireland 18, 125–36.Google Scholar
Stewart, T. A. (1970 b). Studies on the use of animal slurries to manure barley. 2. The effect of autumn, winter and spring applications of cow, pig and poultry slurry. Record of Agricultural Research, Ministry of Agriculture of Northern Ireland 18, 137–42.Google Scholar
Widdowson, F. V. & Cooke, G. W. (1958). Nitrogen fertilisers for spring barley and wheat. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 50, 312–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar