Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:38:34.694Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of cultivar, season and site on variation in grain N concentration and N use efficiency of winter wheat in Northern Ireland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2011

E. WHITE
E. WHITE*
Affiliation:
Agri-food and Biosciences Institute (AFBI), Applied Plant Science and Biometrics Division, AFBI Crossnacreevy, Plant Testing Station, Crossnacreevy, Belfast, UK
*
Email: ethel.white@afbini.gov.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A detailed study of nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and its components in three cultivars of winter wheat, Hereward, Rialto and Riband was undertaken in cultivar trials conducted in Northern Ireland in 1998 and 1999. Yield, grain N concentration, harvest index (HI), nitrogen harvest index (NHI), N uptake efficiency (NUpE), total N uptake, grain N off-take, N utilization efficiency (NUtE) and NUE itself all showed significant variation between sites. Cvars Hereward and Rialto had similar mean values across all the sites for many of the characteristics, with Riband usually differing. In all but one characteristic, grain N concentration, the responses of the three cultivars varied significantly from trial to trial and this, along with the substantial variation between sites, indicates that genetic control of the characteristics is partial. The amount of N applied as fertilizer accounted for little of the variation among the trials with weak associations for NUpE, which decreased, and grain yield, which increased with increasing fertilizer N. Neither grain yield nor NUE was associated with the amount of N taken up by the crop, but grain N concentration increased and NUtE decreased significantly. HI and NHI differed significantly among the cultivars, diverging at higher N uptakes, with Hereward and Rialto being similar and distinctly different from Riband. Grain yield was only weakly associated with NUpE but was strongly and positively associated with NUtE and NUE. The strong negative association between NUtE and NUpE highlights the potential and the urgency of understanding factors influencing uptake of nitrogen by crops. The extent of the non-genetic, i.e. environmental and management, variation in the characteristics, along with the relative similarity of the cultivar means, throws up a challenge to plant breeders, agronomists and researchers wishing to improve NUE genetically and through management. As with yield and other characteristics, a large number of trials will be required to identify consistent differences in NUE among cultivars. Thus, while mechanisms underlying NUE, NUpE and NUtE need to be understood, the possibility of using the HGCA UK Recommended List database to investigate NUE and identify cultivars with improved NUE should also be considered. Since in each of the HGCA trials cultivars have access to the same available N, and since grain yield=available N×NUE, grain yield itself is a surrogate for the NUE of cultivars. Grain N concentration is only determined in a few cultivars at present but could be used as an indicator of optimal N availability in individual trials, allowing variation in NUE of cultivars in response to agro-ecological factors on NUE to be studied.

Type
Crops and Soils Research Papers
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 150 , Issue 4 , August 2012 , pp. 460 - 472
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anon (1999). UK Recommended Lists for Cereals 1999. London: HGCA.Google Scholar
Anon (2000). Fertiliser Recommendations for Agricultural and Horticultural Crops (RB 209), 7th edn. London: MAFF.Google Scholar
Anon (2010). Fertiliser Manual (RB 209). London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Anon (2011 a). Met Office UK Climate Averages: Northern Ireland 1971–2000 Averages. Exeter, UK: The Stationery Office. Available online at http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate/uk/averages/19712000/areal/n_ireland.html (verified 11 August 2011).Google Scholar
Anon (2011 b). Met Office UK Mapped Climate Averages: Annual Average Rainfall. Exeter, UK: The Stationery Office. Available online at http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate/uk/averages/19712000/rr/17.gif (verified 11 August 2011).Google Scholar
Anon (2011 c). UK Cereal and Oilseed Rape Recommended List Trial Protocols. London: HGCA. Available online at http://www.hgca.com/content.output/238/262/group/subgroup/Recommended%20list%20protocols.mspx (verified 11 August 2011).Google Scholar
AOAC (2000). Official Methods of Analysis AOAC International, 17th edn. Arlington, VA: AOAC.Google Scholar
Austin, R. B., Bingham, J., Blackwell, R. D., Evans, L. T., Ford, M. A., Morgan, C. L. & Taylor, M. (1980). Genetic improvements in winter wheat yields since 1900 and associated physiological changes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 94, 675–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barraclough, P. B., Howarth, J. R., Jones, J., Lopez-Bellido, R., Parmar, S., Shepherd, C. E. & Hawkesford, M. J. (2010). Nitrogen efficiency of wheat: Genotypic and environmental variation and prospects for improvement. European Journal of Agronomy 33, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foulkes, M. J., Hawkesford, M. J., Barraclough, P. B., Holdsworth, M. J., Kerr, S., Kightley, S. & Shewry, P. R. (2009). Identifying traits to improve the nitrogen economy of wheat: Recent advances and future prospects. Field Crops Research 114, 329–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jing, Q., Van Keulen, H., Hengsdijk, H., Cao, W., Bindraban, P. S., Dai, T. & Jiang, D. (2009). Quantifying N response and N use efficiency in rice–wheat (RW) cropping systems under different water management. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 147, 303–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kindred, D. R. & Sylvester-Bradley, R. (2010). Routes to reducing the N requirements of high yielding wheat. Aspects of Applied Biology 105, 97–106.Google Scholar
Knight, S., Macdonald, A., Glendining, M., Whitmore, A., Dailey, G., Goulding, K., Sinclair, A. & Rees, B. (2008). Better Estimation of Soil Nitrogen Use Efficiency by Cereals and Oilseed Rape. Home-Grown Cereals Authority Research Review No. 68. London: HGCA.Google Scholar
Mackay, I., Horwell, A., Garner, J., White, J., Mckee, J. & Philpott, H. (2010). Reanalyses of the historical series of UK variety trials to quantify the contributions of genetic and environmental factors to trends and variability in yield over time. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 122, 225–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naylor, R. E. L., Stokes, D. T. & Matthews, S. (1998). Biomass, shoot uniformity and yield of winter barley. The Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 131, 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shearman, V. J., Sylvester-Bradley, R., Scott, R. K. & Foulkes, M. J. (2005). Physiological processes associated with wheat yield progress in the UK. Crop Science 45, 175–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sylvester-Bradley, R., Foulkes, M. J. & Reynolds, M. (2005). Future wheat yields: evidence, theory and conjecture. In Yields of Farmed Species Constraints and Opportunities in the 21st Century (Eds Sylvester-Bradley, R. & Wiseman, J.), pp. 233–260. Nottingham, UK: Nottingham University Press.Google Scholar
Sylvester-Bradley, R. & Clarke, S. (2009). Using Grain N% as a Signature for Good N Use. Home-Grown Cereals Authority Project Report No. 458. London: HGCA.Google Scholar
Sylvester-Bradley, R. & Kindred, D. R. (2009). Analysing nitrogen responses of cereals to prioritize routes to the improvement of nitrogen use efficiency. Journal of Experimental Botany 60, 1939–1951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sylvester-Bradley, R. (2010). Targets, traits and technologies to achieve sustainable productivity with arable crops in the UK. Aspects of Applied Biology 105, 107–114.Google Scholar
White, E. M., Wilson, F. E. A., Kettlewell, P. S., Sylvester-Bradley, R., Foulkes, M. J. & Scott, R. K. (1998). Exploitation of Varieties for UK Cereal Production (Volume III). Varietal Responses to Soil and Fertilizer N Availability. Home-Grown Cereals Authority Project Report No. 174. London: HGCA.Google Scholar
White, E. M. & Wilson, F. E. A. (2006). Responses of grain yield, biomass and harvest index and their rates of genetic progress to nitrogen availability in ten winter wheat varieties. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research 45, 85–101.Google Scholar