Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:39:47.230Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effects of diets deficient in phosphorus, phosphorus and vitamin D, or calcium, on the skeleton and teeth of the growing sheep. I. The mineral status of the skeleton and clinical appearance of the teeth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. R. McRoberts
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen
R. Hill
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen
A. C. Dalgarno
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen

Extract

1. Young sheep, aged either 2 or 6 months, were fed for various periods on diets low in either phosphorus, vitamin D, phosphorus and vitamin D, or calcium and subsequently for 12 months on control diets.

2. The effects of treatment on the mineral status of the animals were judged by the calcium and phosphorus contents of the blood, the ash contents and radiological appearance of the bones, and the clinical appearance of the limbs. The quality of the teeth produced by each treatment was judged clinically.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benzie, D., Boyne, A. W., Dalgarno, A. C., Duckworth, J. & Hill, R. (1959). J. Agric. Sci. 52, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benzie, D., Boyne, A. W., Dalgarno, A. C., Duckworth, J., Hill, R. & Walker, D. M. (1960). J. Agric. Sci. 54, 201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. P. & Collip, J. B. (1925). J. Biol. Chem. 63, 461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalgarno, A. C. & Hill, R. (1961). Res. Vet. Sci. 2, 107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalgarno, A. C., Hill, R. & McDonald, I. (1962). Brit. J. Nutr. 16, 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duckworth, J., Benzie, D., Cresswell, E., Hill, R., Dalgarno, A. C., Robinson, J. F. & Robson, H. W. (1961). Res. Vet. Sci. 2, 375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duckworth, J., Hill, R., Benzie, D., Dalgarno, A. C. & Robinson, J. F. (1962). Res. Vet. Sci. 3, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, C. H. & Subbarow, Y. (1925). J. Biol. Chem. 66, 375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, M. C. (1950). Bull. Commonw. Sci. Ind. Res. Org. Aust., no. 252.Google Scholar
Gaunt, W. E. & Irving, J. T. (1940). J. Physiol. 99, 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godden, W. (1937). Imp. Bur. Animal Nutr. Tech. Comm. no. 9.Google Scholar
McRoberts, M. R. & Hill, R. (1962). Nature, Lond., 194, 92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McRoberts, M. R., Hill, R. & Dalgarno, A. C. (1965). J. Agric. Sci. 65, 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, C. J. & Peirce, A. W. (1934). Bull. Commonw. Sci. Ind. Res. Org., Aust., no. 77.Google Scholar
Miller, W. C. (1946). Black's Veterinary Dictionary, p. 834. London: Black.Google Scholar
Theiler, A. (1934). Vet. J. 90, 143.Google Scholar
Thomas, B., Escritt, J. R. & Trinder, N. (1945). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 13, 93.Google Scholar