Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:02:48.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exploring the spatial variation in the fertilizer-nitrogen requirement of wheat within fields

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2014

D. R. KINDRED ,
A. E. MILNE ,
R. WEBSTER ,
B. P. MARCHANT  and
R. SYLVESTER-BRADLEY
D. R. KINDRED*
Affiliation:
ADAS, Boxworth, Cambridge CB23 4NN, UK
A. E. MILNE
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire AL5 2JQ, UK
R. WEBSTER
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire AL5 2JQ, UK
B. P. MARCHANT
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK
R. SYLVESTER-BRADLEY
Affiliation:
ADAS, Boxworth, Cambridge CB23 4NN, UK
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: daniel.kindred@adas.co.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The fertilizer-nitrogen (N) requirement for wheat grown in the UK varies from field to field. Differences in the soil type, climate and cropping history result in differences in (i) the crops’ demands for N, (ii) the supply of N from the soil (SNS) and (iii) the recovery of the fertilizer by the crops. These three components generally form the basis of systems for N recommendation. Three field experiments were set out to investigate the variation of the N requirement for wheat within fields and to explore the importance of variation in the crops’ demands for N, SNS and fertilizer recovery in explaining the differences in the economic optima for N. The N optima were found to vary by >100 kg N/ha at two of the sites. At the other site, the yield response to N was small. Yields at the optimum rate of N varied spatially by c. 4 t/ha at each site. Soil N supply, which was estimated by the unfertilized crops’ harvested N, varied spatially by 120, 75 and 60 kg/ha in the three experiments. Fertilizer recovery varied spatially from 30% to >100% at each of the sites. There were clear relationships between the SNS and the N optima at all the three sites. The expected relationship between the crop's demand for N and N optima was evident at only one of the three sites. There was no consistent relationship between the N recovery and the N optima. A consistent relationship emerged, however, between the optimal yield and SNS; areas with a greater yield potential tending to also supply more N from the soil. This moderated the expected effect of the SNS and the crop's demand for N on the N optima.

Type
Crops and Soils Research Papers
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 153 , Issue 1 , January 2015 , pp. 25 - 41
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akaike, H. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In 2nd International Symposium on Information Theory (Eds Petrov, B. N. & Csáki, F.), pp. 267–281. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Berry, P. M., Kindred, D. R., Olesen, J. E., Jorgensen, L. N. & Paveley, N. D. (2010). Quantifying the effect of interactions between disease control, nitrogen supply and land use change on the greenhouse gas emissions associated with wheat production. Plant Pathology 59, 753–763.Google Scholar
Bishop, T. F. A. & Lark, R. M. (2006). The geostatistical analysis of experiments at the landscape-scale. Geoderma 133, 87–106.Google Scholar
Bloom, T. M., Sylvester-Bradley, R., Vaidyanathan, L. V. & Murray, A. W. A. (1988). Apparent recovery of fertiliser nitrogen by winter wheat. In Nitrogen Efficiency in Agricultural Soils (Eds Jenkinson, D. S. & Smith, K. A.), pp. 27–37. Barking, UK: Elsevier Applied Science.Google Scholar
Boyd, D. A., Yuen, L. T. K. & Needham, P. (1976). Nitrogen requirement of cereals. Part I: Response curves. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 87, 149–162.Google Scholar
Defra (2010). The Fertiliser Manual (RB209). Fertiliser Recommendations for Agricultural and Horticultural Crops, 8th edn. London: TSO.Google Scholar
Grindlay, D. J. C. (1997). Towards an explanation of crop nitrogen demand based on the optimization of leaf nitrogen per unit leaf area. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 128, 377–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heege, H. J., Reusch, S. & Thiessen, E. (2008). Prospects and results for optical systems for site-specific on-the-go control of nitrogen-top-dressing in Germany. Precision Agriculture 9, 115–131.Google Scholar
HGCA (2013). HGCA Recommended Lists 2013/14 for Cereals and Oilseeds. Stoneleigh, UK: HGCA.Google Scholar
Jarvis, M. G., Allen, R. H., Fordham, S. J., Hazelden, J., Moffat, A. J. & Sturdy, R. G. (1984). Soils and their Use in South East England. Soil Survey of England and Wales Bulletin No 15. Harpenden, UK: Lawes Agricultural Trust (Soil Survey of England and Wales).Google Scholar
Kindred, D. R., Knight, S., Berry, P., Sylvester-Bradley, R., Hatley, D., Morris, N., Hoad, S. & White, C. (2012) Establishing Best Practice for Estimation of Soil N Supply. HGCA Project Report No. 490. London: HGCA.Google Scholar
Knight, S., Macdonald, A., Glendining, M., Whitmore, A., Dailey, G., Goulding, K., Sinclair, A. & Rees, B. (2008). Better Estimation of Soil Nitrogen Use Efficiency by Cereals and Oilseed Rape. HGCA Research Review 68. London: HGCA.Google Scholar
Lark, R. M. & Wheeler, H. C. (2003). A method to investigate within-field variation of the response to combinable crops to an input. Agronomy Journal 95, 1093–1104.Google Scholar
Lemaire, G., Van Oosterom, E., Sheehy, J., Jeuffroy, M. H., Massignam, A. & Rossato, L. (2007). Is crop N demand more closely related to dry matter accumulation or leaf area expansion during vegetative growth? Field Crops Research 100, 91–106.Google Scholar
Marchant, B. P., Dailey, A. G. & Lark, R. M. (2012). Cost Effective Sampling Strategies for Soil Management. HGCA Project Report 485. London, UK: HGCA.Google Scholar
Milne, A. E., Ferguson, R. B. & Lark, R. M. (2006). Estimating a boundary line model for a biological response by maximum likelihood. Annals of Applied Biology 149, 223–234.Google Scholar
Milne, A. E., Webster, R., Ginsberg, D. & Kindred, D. (2012). Spatial multivariate classification of an arable field into compact management zones based on past crop yields. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 80, 17–30.Google Scholar
Pask, A. J. D., Sylvester-Bradley, R., Jamieson, P. D. & Foulkes, M. J. (2012). Quantifying how winter wheat crops accumulate and use nitrogen reserves during growth. Field Crops Research 126, 104–118.Google Scholar
Payne, R. W., Harding, S. A., Murray, D. A., Soutar, D. M., Baird, D. B., Glaser, A. I., Welham, S. J., Gilmour, A. R., Thompson, R. & Webster, R. (2011). The Guide to GenStat, Release 14 – Part 2 Statistics. Hemel Hempstead, UK: VSN International.Google Scholar
Pringle, M. J., Mcbratney, A. B. & Cook, S. E. (2004). Field-scale experiments for site specific crop management. Part II: a geostatistical analysis. Precision Agriculture 5, 625–645.Google Scholar
Ragg, J. M., Beard, G. R., George, H., Heaven, F. W., Hollis, J. M., Jones, R. J. A., Palmer, R. C., Reeve, M. J., Robson, J. D. & Whitfield, W. A. D. (1984). Soils and their Use in Midland and Western England. Soil Survey of England and Wales Bulletin No 12. Harpenden, UK: Lawes Agricultural Trust (Soil Survey of England and Wales).Google Scholar
Sutton, M. A., Howard, C. M., Erisman, J. W., Billen, G., Bleeker, A., Grennfelt, P., Van Grinsven, H. & Grizzetti, B. (2011). The European Nitrogen Assessment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sylvester-Bradley, R. (2009). Nitrogen for Winter Wheat – Management Guidelines. Stoneleigh, UK: HGCA.Google Scholar
Sylvester-Bradley, R. & Clarke, S. (2009). Using Grain N% as a Signature for Good N Use. HGCA Project Report No. 458. London: HGCA.Google Scholar
Sylvester-Bradley, R. & Kindred, D. R. (2009). Analysing nitrogen responses of cereals to prioritize routes to the improvement of nitrogen use efficiency. Journal of Experimental Botany 60, 1939–1951.Google Scholar
Sylvester-Bradley, R. & Withers, P. J. A. (2013). Innovating in Crop Nutrition to Support Potential Crop Yields. Proceedings of the International Fertiliser Society 715. Leek, UK: International Fertiliser Society.Google Scholar
Sylvester-Bradley, R., Kindred, D. R., Blake, J., Dyer, C. J. & Sinclair, A. H. (2008). Optimising Fertiliser Nitrogen for Modern Wheat and Barley Crops. HGCA Final Report Project No 438. London: HGCA.Google Scholar
Sylvester-Bradley, R., Wiltshire, J. J. J., Kindred, D. R., Hatley, D. L. J. & Clarke, S. (2009). Detecting Soil Nitrogen Supplies by Canopy Sensing. Proof of Concept – Phase 2. HGCA Project Report 460. London: HGCA.Google Scholar
Sylvester-Bradley, R., Kindred, D. R., Wynn, S. C., Thorman, R. E. & Smith, K. E. (2013). Efficiencies of nitrogen fertilizers for winter cereal production, with implications for greenhouse gas intensities of grain. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 152, 3–22.Google Scholar
Webb, R. A. (1972). Use of the boundary line in analysis of biological data. Journal of Horticultural Science 47, 309–319.Google Scholar