Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:49:23.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fleece shedding, staple length and fleece weight in experimental Wiltshire Horn-Scottish Blackface sheep crosses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

John Slee
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Animal Breeding Research Organisation, Edinburgh, 9

Extract

1. A crossing experiment was carried out between two breeds of sheep: the Wiltshire Horn—a breed with a short-stapled fleece which is normally shed both in lambs and adults, and the Scottish Blackface—which has a long-stapled carpet type of fleece. Animals of F1, F2 and both backcross generations were studied for gross characteristics of the fleece.

2. The influence of the Wiltshire genotype caused a high incidence of fleece-shedding animals amongst all the crosses. Three separate components of the shedding process were distinguished: (a) the ability to shed, (b) the extent of shedding—or proportion of the body area denuded, (c) the time of onset of shedding. Attributes (a) and (b) were determined genetically; control was probably on a multifactorial basis, although there may have been fewer genes involved than for the other characters studied. Given the genetically determined existence of (a) and (b), (c) was apparently controlled by the environment. Seasonal change in day length was postulated as a major operative factor.

3. The mid-side staple length of Wiltshire crosses was less than that of the Blackface parents. The decrease resulted partly from shedding and partly also from a reduction in the average growth rate of some fibres. When corrected for shedding the mean staple lengths of the crosses were about equal to the values theoretically expected on the basis of multifactorial inheritance without directional dominance.

4. The mean fleece weight of the Wiltshire crosses was less than that of the Blackface parents, due, about equally, to: (a) loss of wool by fleece shedding, (b) reduced wool production—probably caused, at least partly, by the decreased average growth rate of some of the component fibres of the fleece. Differences in wool production appeared to be inherited multifaetorially.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Burns, Marca (1953). J. Agric. Sci. 43, 422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coop, I. E. & Hart, D. S. (1953). Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 12, 113.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1948). Statistical Methods for Research Workers, 10th ed.Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Hart, D. S. (1953). Nature, Lond., 171, 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rougeot, J. (1957). C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 151, 834.Google Scholar
Ryder, M. L. (1956). J. Agric. Sci. 47, 129.Google Scholar
Slee, J. (1957). J. Genet. 55, 100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildman, A. B. (1957). Nature, Lond., 180, 296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeates, N. T. M. (1958). J. Agric.Sci. 50, 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar