Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T21:42:01.974Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The growth and development of Corchorus olitorius (L.) grown alone and intercropped with tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum (Mill.))

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

I. M. Ojeifo  and
E. O. Lucas
I. M. Ojeifo
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Ibadan, Nigeria
E. O. Lucas
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Ibadan, Nigeria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Two experiments were conducted on two varieties of Corchorus olitorius(‘NHCo 6’ and ‘NHCo 7’). The first one was on the effect of density of planting on their growth and development whilst the second was on the best planting ratio for Corchorus-tomato intercropping.

There was no significant difference in morphological characters of the two varieties. The maximum value of leaf area index for the two varieties was around 3. Maximum marketable and edible yields were obtained for the two varieties at 30 × 5 cm (666600 plants/ha) and the best time for harvesting was 44 days after sowing.

The best planting ratio for Corchorus-tomato intercrop was 2 rows of Corchorus and 1 row of tomato for maximum edible yield of Corchorus but for maximum economic returns, the best ratio was 1 row of Corchorus to 2 rows of tomato.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 109 , Issue 1 , August 1987 , pp. 39 - 45
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adelana, B. O. & Oyedokun, J. B. (1979). Variety × environment interaction in Western Nigeria tomatoes. Experimental Agriculture 15, 285–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudhuri, S. K. & Kase-Ali, M. (1962), Studies on line sowing and traditional sowing of jute. Jute Gunny Review 14, 101–108.Google Scholar
Enyi, B. A. C. (1965). Effect of age of seedling, height and frequency of cutting on growth and yield of African spinach (Amaranthus oleraceus). The Nigerian Agricultural Journal 2 (1), 35–38.Google Scholar
Ghosh, T. (1983). Handbook on jute. F. A. O. Plant Production and Protection Paper, No. 51. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation.Google Scholar
Gurnani, K. L. (1958). Income from jute fields up 23 percent. Indian Farming 8, 6–7.Google Scholar
Oke, O. L. (1968). Chemical changes in some Nigerian vegetables during growth. Experimental Agriculture 4, 345–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olufolaji, A. O. (1981). Effect of varieties, spacing and fertilizer on the growth and development of Amaranthus species and Celosia argentia. M. Phil, dissertation, Department of Agricultural Biology, University of Ibadan.Google Scholar
Omidiji, M. O. (1978). Tropical leaf and fruit vegetables in Nigeria. Vegetables for the hot, humid tropics. A Newsletter and Annual Communication among Research Workers. Mayaguez, Puerto Rico: Mayaguez Institute of Tropical Agriculture.Google Scholar
Trenbath, B. R. (1974). Biomass productivity of mixtures. Advances in Agronomy 26, 177–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trenbath, B. R. (1976). Plant interactions in mixed communities. Multiple cropping. American Society of Agronomy, Special Publication no. 27.Google Scholar