Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:58:40.851Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Infertile bulls versus steers: IV. Meat quality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. A. Price
Affiliation:
Department of Livestock Husbandry, University of New England, Armidale, N.S.W. 2351, Australia

Summary

Meat quality comparisons were made between a total of 43 infertile bulls and 42 steers in five separate trials. Tenderness, juiciness and flavour were tested by taste panel for each of the five trials, making 15 subjective tests, while objective tests were made of tenderness (Warner-Bratzler shear) and juiciness (industrial press) in the five trials, making a further ten tests.

From this total of 25 different groups of assessments no significant difference between bull and steer meat was detected in 21; of the four groups of assessments where significant differences were detected, two favoured the bulls and two favoured the steers; the quality of all the samples was acceptable.

It is concluded from the overall results that in terms of practical meat quality there was no difference between the bulls and steers used in these five trials.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, C. M., Probert, C. L., Richardson, Paula, Bohman, V. R. & Chanoerelle, Jullanne (1966). Quality factors of the Longissimus dorsi of young bulls and steers. J. Anim. Sci. 25, 504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bojarskii, L. G. (1964). The effectiveness of fattening entire bull calves. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 32, no. 2751.Google Scholar
Brown, C. J., Bartee, J. D. & Lewis, P. J. (1962). Relationships among performance records, carcase cut out data, and eating quality of bulls and steers. Ark. agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 655.Google Scholar
Gaddis, A. M., Hankins, o. G. & Hiner, R. L. (1950). Relationships between the amount and composition of press fluid, palatibility and other factors of meat. Food. Tech. 4, 498.Google Scholar
Hunsley, R. B., Vetter, R. L., Kline, E. A. & Burroughs, W. (1967). Effects of age and sex on quality, tenderness and collagen content of bovine Longissimus dorsi muscle. J. Anim. Sci. 26, 1469.Google Scholar
Mglinec, A. I. (1967). The meat quality of bulls and steers. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 37, no. 112.Google Scholar
Pearson, A. M. (1963). Objective and subjective measurements for meat tenderness. In Proc. Meat Tenderness Symp. Camden, New Jersey: Campbell Soup Co.Google Scholar
Price, M. A. (1971). Infertile bulls versus Steers. III. Carcase characteristics. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 77, 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, M. A. & Yeates, N. T. M. (1971 a). Infertile bulls versus steers. I., The influence of level of nutrition on relative growth rate. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 77, 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, M. A. & Yeates, N. T. M. (1971 b). Infertile bulls versus steers. II. Feed conversion efficiency and the effects of a high fat diet. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 77, 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, M. J. (1964). The effects of castration on the growth and meat quality of grazing cattle. M. Rur. Sc. Thesis, University of New England. Armidale, N.S.W.Google Scholar
Wierricki, E., Cahill, V. R., Kunkle, L. E., Klosterman, E. W. & Deatherage, F. E. (1956). Meat quality. Effect of castration on biochemistry and quality of beef. J. agric. Fd. Chem. 3, 244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wipf, V. K., Carpenter, J. W., Chapman, H. L., Palmer, A. Z. & Cunha, T. J. (1964). Effets of slaughter age and diethylstilboestrol implants on feedlot performance and carcase characteristics of bulls and steers. J. Anim. Sci. 23, 865.Google Scholar
Woodhams, P. R. & Trower, S. J. (1965). Palatability characteristics of rib steaks from Aberdeen Angus steers and bulls. N.Z. Jl agric. Res. 8, 921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeates, N. T. M. (1965). Modern Aspects of Animal Production. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar