Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T21:16:12.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of anaerobic fungi on rumen volatile fatty acid concentrations in vivo

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. Elliott ,
A. J. Ash ,
F. Calderon-Cortes ,
B. W. Norton  and
T. Bauchop
R. Elliott
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia 4067
A. J. Ash
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia 4067
F. Calderon-Cortes
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia 4067
B. W. Norton
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia 4067
T. Bauchop
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, Nutrition and Microbiology, University of New England, Armidale, N. S. W. Australia 2350
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Elimination of the rumen anaerobic fungi from sheep fed chemically-treated barley straw diets resulted in elevated proportions of propionic acid in rumen liquor (from ca. 0·15 to 0·30). Subsequent inoculation of these sheep with a pure culture of fungus decreased propionate concentrations within 3 days to the levels observed in control animals that possessed abundant fungal populations throughout the experiment.

Confirmation that propionate itself was not responsible for the elimination of the fungi was provided by the results of a second experiment in which intraruminal infusions of propionic acid failed to reduce fungal growth or prevent recolonization in sheep previously rendered fungi-free.

In a third experiment with sheep fed untreated barley straw, monensin supplementation produced the well known elevation of propionate concentrations. However, this treatment also resulted in the elimination of rumen anaerobic fungi from the animals. The magnitude of the increased concentration of rumen propionic acid, resulting from the elimination of the anaerobic fungal flora, indicates an important role for the fungi in the fermentation of high-fibre diets. In addition, these findings indicate that the well known elevation of propionate levels produced by monensin may likewise be effected directly by removal of the rumen anaerobic fungi.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 109 , Issue 1 , August 1987 , pp. 13 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, D. G. (1981). Digestion and utilization of energy. In Nutritional Limits to Animal Production from Pastures (ed. Hacker, J. B.), pp. 225–244. Farnham Royal, U. K.: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Bauchop, T. (1979). Rumen anaerobic fungi of cattle and sheep. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 38, 148–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bauchop, T. (1984). Rumen anaerobic fungi and the utilisation of fibrous feeds. Reviews in Rural Science 6. Biotechnology and Recombinant DNA Technology in the Animal Production Industries (ed. Leng, R. A., Barker, J. S. F., Adams, D. B. and Hutchinson, K. J.), pp. 118–123.Google Scholar
Bauchop, T. & Mountfort, D. O. (1981). Cellulose fermentation by a rumen anaerobic fungus in both the absence and the presence of rumen methanogens. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 42, 1103–1110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Body, D. R. & Bauchop, T. (1985). Lipid composition of an obligately anaerobic fungus Neocallimastix frontalis isolated from a bovine rumen. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 31, 463–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalupa, W. (1984). Manipulation of rumen fermentation. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition (ed. Haresign, W. and Cole, J. A.), pp. 143–160. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Coombe, J. B., Dinius, D. A., Goering, H. K. & Oltjen, R. R. (1979). Wheat straw-urea diets for beef steers; alkali treatment and supplementation with protein and monensin, a feed intake stimulant. Journal of Animal Science 48, 1223–1233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, C. W., Elliott, R. & Maynard, P. J. (1987). The effect of chlorite delignification on digestibility of some grass forages and on intake and rumen microbial activity in sheep fed barley straw. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 108, 129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, I. B., Bauchop, T. & Skipp, R. A. (1983). Assignment of the rumen anaerobe Neocallimastix frontalis to the spizellomycetales (Chydridiomycetes) on the basis of its polyflagellate zoospore ultrastructure. Canadian Journal of Botany 61, 295–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mountfort, D. O., Asher, R. A. & Bauchop, T. (1982). Cellulose fermentation to methane and carbon dioxide by a rumen anaerobic fungus in triculture with Metha-nobrevibacter strain RA2 and Methanosarcina barkeri. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 44, 128–134.Google Scholar
Pearce, P. D. & Bauchop, T. (1985). Glycosidases of the rumen anaerobic fungus Neocallimastix frontalis grown on cellulosic substrates. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 49, 1265–1269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schelling, G. T. (1984). Modes of action in manipulating rumen function. In Manipulation of Growth of Farm Animals (ed. Roche, J. F. and O'Callaghan, D. O.), pp. 185–210. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers Group.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, J. I. D., Appleby, W. G. C, Shaw, C. J., LeBas, G. & Pfug, R. (1980). The use of monensin in European pasture cattle. Animal Production 31, 159–162.Google Scholar
Wood, T. M., Wilson, C. A., McCrae, S. I. & Joblin, K. N. (1986). A highly active extracellular cellulose from the anaerobic rumen fungus Neocallimastix frontalis. FEMS Microbiology Letters 34, 37–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar