Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:59:59.785Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of planting seed tubers with gangrene(Phoma foveata) and of neighbouring healthy, diseased and missing plants on the yield and size of potatoes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. A. Hide ,
S. J. Welham ,
P. J. Read  and
A. E. Ainsley
G. A. Hide
Affiliation:
IACR-Rothamsted, Harpenden, Herts AL5 2JQ, UK
S. J. Welham
Affiliation:
IACR-Rothamsted, Harpenden, Herts AL5 2JQ, UK
P. J. Read
Affiliation:
IACR-Rothamsted, Harpenden, Herts AL5 2JQ, UK
A. E. Ainsley
Affiliation:
IACR-Rothamsted, Harpenden, Herts AL5 2JQ, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Potato seed tubers infected or not infected with gangrene (Phoma foveata) were planted at Rothatnsted in 1987 to measure the effect of the disease and of neighbouring plants on yield. The experimental design was constructed so that the effect on growth of six adjacent plants (two nearest neighbours in each direction within rows and one nearest neighbour in each direction across rows) could be estimated for each plant. Total yield, ware (> 150 g) yield and tuber number from individual plants were affected most by the disease but also, in decreasing importance, by the two plants on either side within the same row (first neighbours), the two plants adjacent to the first neighbours (second neighbours) and the two adjacent plants in the rows on either side. Yield and tuber numbers increased as the different combinations of neighbouring plants contained increasing proportions of plants from diseased seed and missing plants; plants compensated for decreasing competition. Tuber size distributions showed that numbers of ware tubers decreased with increasing competition whereas numbers of small tubers were less affected. The fitted model was used to predict yields from crops planted with different proportions of diseased or missing seed tubers.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 125 , Issue 1 , August 1995 , pp. 51 - 60
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, M. J. & Lapwood, D. H. (1983). The effect of Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica (blackleg) on potato plants. II. Compensatory growth. Annals of Applied Biology 103, 79–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blodgett, F. M. (1941). A method for the determination of losses due to diseased or missing plants. American Potato Journal 18, 132–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, R. L., Hide, G. A., Hirst, J. M. & Stedman, O. J. (1974). Effects of gangrene (Phoma exigua) on potatoes. Annals of Applied Biology 77, 237–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hide, G. A. & Read, P. J. (1990). Effect of neighbouring plants on the yield of potatoes from seed tubers affected with gangrene (Phoma foveata) or from plants affected with stem canker (Rhizoclonia solani). Annals of Applied Biology 116, 233–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hide, G. A. & Welham, S. J. (1992). Observations on the bulking and development of tuber size distribution in maincrop potatoes at Rothamsted in 1964–75. Potato Research 35, 235–247.Google Scholar
Hide, G. A., Griffith, R. L. & Adams, M. J. (1977). Methods of measuring the prevalence of Phoma exigua on potatoes and in soil. Annals of Applied Biology 87, 7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, J. M., Hide, G. A., Stedman, O. J. & Griffith, R. L. (1973). Yield compensation in gappy potato crops and methods to measure effects of fungi pathogenic on seed tubers. Annals of Applied Biology 73, 143–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempton, R. A. (1993). Interference in agricultural experiments. In Proceedings of the 2nd Meeting of the Biometric Society, East, Central and Southern African Network (Eds. Kempton, R., Coe, R. & Canhao, J.), pp. 1–16, Harare, Zimbabwe.Google Scholar
Reestman, A. J. (1972). Incidence of infection in commercial crops and consequent losses. In Viruses of Potatoes and Seed-potato Production (Ed. Bokx, J. A. de), pp. 152–157. Wageningen: Pudoc.Google Scholar
Svensson, B. (1966). Seed tuber-stand-yield. Properties and relationships. Växtodling 21.Google Scholar
Werner, H. O. & Kiesselbach, T. A. (1930). The effect of vacant hills and plat competition upon the yield of potatoes in field experiments. Proceedings of the Potato Association of America 16, 109–120.Google Scholar