Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T02:56:53.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Methane emissions from cattle manure during short-term storage with and without a plastic cover in different seasons

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2021

H. R. Zhang
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450046, China
K. J. Sun
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450046, China
L. F. Wang
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450046, China
Z. W. Teng
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450046, China
L. Y. Zhang
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450046, China
T. Fu
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450046, China
T. Y. Gao*
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450046, China
*
Author for correspondence: Teng-yun Gao, E-mail: dairycow@163.com

Abstract

Manure is a primary source of methane (CH4) emissions into the atmosphere. A large proportion of CH4 from manure is emitted during storage, but this varies with storage methods. In this research, we tested whether covering a manure heap with plastic reduces CH4 emission during a short-term composting process. A static chamber method was used to detect the CH4 emission rate and the change of the physicochemical properties of cattle manure which was stored either uncovered (treatment UNCOVERED) or covered with plastic (treatment COVERED) for 30-day periods during the four seasons? The dry matter content of the COVERED treatment was significantly less than the UNCOVERED treatment (P < 0.01), and the C/N ratio of the COVERED treatment significantly greater than the UNCOVERED treatment (P > 0.05) under high temperature. In the UNCOVERED treatment, average daily methane (CH4) emissions were in the order summer > spring > autumn > winter. CH4 emissions were positively correlated with the temperature (R2 = 0.52, P < 0.01). Compared to the UNCOVERED treatment, the daily average CH4 emission rates from COVERED treatment manure were less in the first 19 days of spring, 13 days of summer, 10 days of autumn and 30 days of winter. In summary, covering the manure pile with plastic reduces the evaporation of water during storage; and in winter, long-term covering with plastic film reduces the CH4 emissions during the storage of manure.

Type
Climate Change and Agriculture Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamsen, APS and King, GM (1993). Methane consumption in temperate and subarctic forest soils: rates, vertical zonation, and responses to water and nitrogen. Applied & Environmental Microbiology 59, 485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amon, B, Kryvoruchko, V, Amon, T and Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S (2006). Methane, nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions during storage and after application of dairy cattle slurry and influence of slurry treatment. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 112, 153162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AOAC (1990). AOAC President for 1990. Analytica Chimica Acta 233, 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barret, M, Gagnon, N, Topp, E, Masse, L, Massé, DI and Talbot, G (2013). Physico-chemical characteristics and methanogen communities in swine and dairy manure storage tanks: spatio-temporal variations and impact on methanogenic activity. Water Research 47, 737746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chadwick, DR (2005). Emissions of ammonia, nitrous oxide and methane from cattle manure heaps: effect of compaction and covering. Atmospheric Environment 39, 787799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Da Silva, MLB, Cantão, ME, Mezzari, MP, Ma, J & Nossa, CW (2015). Assessment of bacterial and archaeal community structure in swine wastewater treatment processes. Microbial Ecology 70(1), 7787.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eunjong, K, Seunghun, L, Hyeonsoo, J, Jihyeon, J, Walter, M, Shafiqur, R and Heekwon, A (2018). Solid-state anaerobic digestion of dairy manure from a sawdust-bedded pack barn: moisture responses. Energies 11, 484.Google Scholar
Fathi Aghdam, E, Scheutz, C and Kjeldsen, P (2017). Assessment of methane production from shredder waste in landfills: the influence of temperature, moisture and metals. Waste Management 63, 226237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
García-Marco, S, Ravella, SR, Chadwick, D, Vallejo, A, Gregory, AS and Cárdenas, LM (2014). Ranking factors affecting emissions of GHG from incubated agricultural soils. European Journal of Soil Science 65(4), 573583.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
González-Avalos, E and Ruiz-Suárez, LG (2001). Methane emission factors from cattle manure in Mexico. Bioresource Technology 80, 6371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gupta, PK, Jha, AK, Koul, S, Sharma, P, Pradhan, V, Gupta, V, Sharma, C and Singh, N (2007). Methane and nitrous oxide emission from bovine manure management practices in India. Environmental Pollution 146, 219224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hao, XY, Larney, FJ, Chang, C, Travis, GR, Nichol, CK and Bremer, E (2005). The effect of phosphogypsum on greenhouse gas emissions during cattle manure composting. Journal of Environmental Quality 34, 774781.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holly, MA, Larson, RA, Powell, JM, Ruark, MD and Aguirre-Villegas, H (2017). Greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions from digested and separated dairy manure during storage and after land application. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 239, 410419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hristov, AN, Oh, J, Firkins, JL, Dijkstra, J, Kebreab, E, Waghorn, G, Makkar, HPS, Adesogan, AT, Yang, W and Lee, C (2013). Special topics—mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: I. A review of enteric methane mitigation options1. Journal of Animal Science 91(11), 50455069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husted, S (1994). Seasonal variation in methane emission from stored slurry and solid manures. Journal of Environmental Quality 23(3), 585592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Im, S, Petersen, SO, Lee, D and Kim, DH (2020). Effects of storage temperature on CH4 emissions from cattle manure and subsequent biogas production potential. Waste Management 101, 3543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, KA and Johnson, DE (1995). Methane emissions from cattle. Journal of Animal Science 73, 24832492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kreuzer, M and Hindrichsen, IK (2006). Methane mitigation in ruminants by dietary means: the role of their methane emission from manure. International Congress Series 1293, 199208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, C, Guo, T, Chen, Y, Meng, Q, Zhu, C, Huang, H (2018). Physicochemical characteristics of stored cattle manure affect methane emissions by inducing divergence of methanogens that have different interactions with bacteria. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 253, 3847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, RD, Li, YE, Wan, YF, Liu, YT and Jin, L (2007). Emission of greenhouse gases from stored dairy manure and influence factors. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering 08, 198204.Google Scholar
Mathot, M, Decruyenaere, V, Stilmant, D and Lambert, R (2012). Effect of cattle diet and manure storage conditions on carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide emissions from tie-stall barns and stored solid manure. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 148, 134144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ngwabie, NM, Jeppsson, KH, Gustafsson, G and Nimmermark, S (2011). Effects of animal activity and air temperature on methane and ammonia emissions from a naturally ventilated building for dairy cows. Atmospheric Environment 45, 67606768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patra, AK (2012). Enteric methane mitigation technologies for ruminant livestock: a synthesis of current research and future directions. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 184, 19291952.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petersen, SO (2018). Greenhouse gas emissions from liquid dairy manure: prediction and mitigation. Journal of Dairy Science 101, 66426654.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Popovic, O and Jensen, LS (2012). Storage temperature affects distribution of carbon, VFA, ammonia, phosphorus, copper and zinc in raw pig slurry and its separated liquid fraction. Water Research 46, 38493858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ren, F, Zhang, X, Liu, J, Sun, N, Wu, L, Li, Z and Xu, M (2017). A synthetic analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from manure amended agricultural soils in China. Scientific Reports 7, 8123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sakabe, A, Kosugi, Y, Takahashi, K, Itoh, M, Kanazawa, A, Makita, N and Ataka, M (2015). One year of continuous measurements of soil CH4 and CO2 fluxes in a Japanese cypress forest: temporal and spatial variations associated with Asian monsoon rainfall. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences 120, 585599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sg, Ommer and Møller, H (2000) Emission of greenhouse gases during composting of deep litter from pig production effect of straw content. The Journal of Agricultural Science 134, 327335.Google Scholar
Shakoor, A, Shakoor, S, Rehman, A, Ashraf, F, Abdullah, M, Shahzad, SM, Farooq, TH, Ashraf, M, Manzoor, MA, Altaf, MM and Altaf, MA (2021). Effect of animal manure, crop type, climate zone, and soil attributes on greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural soils–A global meta-analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production 278, 124019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommer, SG, Petersen, SO, Sorensen, P, Poulsen, HD and Moller, HB (2007). Methane and carbon dioxide emissions and nitrogen turnover during liquid manure storage. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 78, 2736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanderzaag, AC, Gordon, RJ, Jamieson, RC, Burton, DL and Stratton, GW (2009). Gas emissions from straw covered liquid dairy manure during summer storage and autumn agitation. Transactions of the ASABE 52, 599608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner-Riddle, C, Park, K-H and Thurtell, GW (2006). A micrometeorological mass balance approach for greenhouse gas flux measurements from stored animal manure. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 136, 175187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamulki, S (2006). Effect of straw addition on nitrous oxide and methane emissions from stored farmyard manures. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 112, 140145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar