Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T02:12:01.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mixed grazing systems of sheep and cattle to improve liveweight gain: a quantitative review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2013

S. d'ALEXIS ,
D. SAUVANT  and
M. BOVAL
S. d'ALEXIS
Affiliation:
INRA, UR143, Unité de Recherches Zootechniques, Domaine Duclos, 97170 Petit Bourg, Guadeloupe (F.W.I.), France
D. SAUVANT
Affiliation:
UMR Physiologie de la Nutrition et Alimentation, INRA-AgroParisTech, 16 rue Claude Bernard, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France
M. BOVAL*
Affiliation:
INRA, UR143, Unité de Recherches Zootechniques, Domaine Duclos, 97170 Petit Bourg, Guadeloupe (F.W.I.), France
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: maryline.boval@antilles.inra.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Mixed grazing is an alternative pasture management which can be used to increase ruminant performance and reduce gastro-intestinal nematodes. A meta-analysis was performed on the results of previous studies from the literature to quantify the benefit of mixed grazing with sheep and cattle and identify determinants and enhancing factors. The analysis focused on papers reporting measurements of average daily weight gain (ADG) of sheep and cattle, carried out simultaneously in mixed grazing and in mono-grazing. The meta-analysis used 179 observations from 16 experiments published in nine carefully selected papers. The benefits of mixed grazing were appraised using the individual ADG of sheep (ADGisheep), cattle (ADGicattle) and the overall performances (ADG per hectare (ADGha), g/day/ha). A theoretical production value (ADGha-Theo) was calculated from the ADGha in mixed and mono-grazing at similar stocking rates (SRs)/ha. The ADGisheep was greater in mixed treatments compared with control treatments (+14·5 g/day, P<0·001) and varied with physiological status and SR (P<0·001). The ADGicattle was similar in mixed and mono-grazing. At a global level ADGha in mixed treatments (ADGha-Mtrt) was higher by 28·6% compared with sheep alone and by 25·1% compared with cattle alone; also, ADGha-Mtrt was 8% higher than ADGha-Theo. The ADGha varied with physiological status and decreased with the proportion of sheep in association (P<0·01). The contribution of ADGha in mixed grazing due to each species was lower compared with gains for each species reared alone (1438 v. 2423 g/day/ha for sheep and 1687 v. 2491 g/day/ha for cattle, P<0·001).

Type
Animal Review
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 152 , Issue 4 , August 2014 , pp. 655 - 666
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abaye, A. O., Allen, V. G. & Fontenot, J. P. (1994). Influence of grazing cattle and sheep together and separately on animal performance and forage quality. Journal of Animal Science 72, 1013–1022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barger, I. (1997). Control by management. Veterinary Parasitology 72, 493–506.Google Scholar
Bedell, T. E. (1973). Botanical composition of subclover-grass pastures as affected by single and dual grazing by cattle and sheep. Agronomy Journal 65, 502–504.Google Scholar
Bennett, D., Morley, F. H. W., Clark, K. W. & Dudzinski, M. L. (1970). The effect of grazing cattle and sheep together. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 10, 694–709.Google Scholar
Brelin, B. (1979). Mixed grazing with sheep and cattle compared with single grazing. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 9, 113–120.Google Scholar
Cabaret, J., Bouilhol, M. & Mage, C. (2002). Managing helminths of ruminants in organic farming. Veterinary Research 33, 625–640.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cobon, D. H. & O'Sullivan, B. M. (1992). Effect of Haemonchus contortus on productivity of ewes, lambs and weaners in a semi-arid environment. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 118, 245–248.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. & Nolan, T. (1976). Design and analysis of mixed grazing experiments. Animal Production 23, 63–71.Google Scholar
Cook, C. W., Harris, L. E. & Young, M. C. (1967). Botanical and nutritive content of diets of cattle and sheep under single and common use of mountain range. Journal of Animal Science 26, 1169–1174.Google Scholar
Culpin, S., Evans, W. M. R. & Francis, A. C. (1964). An experiment on mixed stocking of pasture. Experimental Husbandry 10, 29–38.Google Scholar
Ebersohn, J. (1966). Effects of stocking rate, grazing method and ratio of cattle to sheep on animal liveweight gains in a semi-arid environment. In Proceedings of the 10th International Grassland Congress, pp. 145–149. Helsinki: Finnish Grassland Association.Google Scholar
Fraser, M. D., Davies, D. A., Vale, J. E., Hirst, W. M. & Wright, I. A. (2007). Effects on animal performance and sward composition of mixed and sequential grazing of permanent pasture by cattle and sheep. Livestock Science 110, 251–266.Google Scholar
Hamilton, D. (1975). Production and gross margins for sheep and cattle grazed separately and together. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 15, 38–44.Google Scholar
Hamilton, D. & Bath, J. G. (1970). Performance of sheep and cattle grazed separately and together. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 10, 19–26.Google Scholar
Hoste, H., Guitard, J. P. & Pons, J. C. (2003). Mixed grazing with cattle and sheep: interest for the control of gastro-intestinal strongyloses. Fourrages 176, 425–436.Google Scholar
Hoste, H., Sotiraki, S., Landau, S. Y., Jackson, F. & Beveridge, I. (2010). Goat–nematode interactions: think differently. Trends in Parasitology 26, 376–381.Google Scholar
Jackson, F., Bartley, D., Bartley, Y. & Kenyon, F. (2009). Worm control in sheep in the future. Small Ruminant Research 86, 40–45.Google Scholar
Jones, R. J. & Sandland, R. L. (1974). The relation between animal gain and stocking rate. Derivation of the relation from the results of grazing trials. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 83, 335–342.Google Scholar
Jordan, H. E., Phillips, W. A., Morrison, R. D., Doyle, J. J. & McKenzie, K. (1988). A 3-year study of continuous mixed grazing of cattle and sheep: parasitism of offspring. International Journal for Parasitology 18, 779–784.Google Scholar
Knox, M. R., Besier, R. B., Le Jambre, L. F., Kaplan, R. M., Torres-Acosta, J. F. J., Miller, J. & Sutherland, I. (2012). Novel approaches for the control of helminth parasites of livestock VI: summary of discussions and conclusions. Veterinary Parasitology 186, 143–149.Google Scholar
Mahieu, M. & Aumont, G. (2009). Effects of sheep and cattle alternate grazing on sheep parasitism and production. Tropical Animal Health and Production 41, 229–239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahieu, M., Aumont, G., Michaux, Y., Alexandre, G., Archimède, H., Boval, M. & Theriez, M. (1997). Mixing grazing sheep/cattle on irrigated pastures in Martinique (FWI). [French]. INRA Productions Animales 10, 55–65.Google Scholar
Malherbe, C. E. (1971). Die resultate van sekere skaap tot bees verhoudingsproewe op suurveld uitgevoer. (The results of certain sheep to cattle ratio experiments, conducted on sourveld). Hand Weidingsveren South Africa 6, 69–77.Google Scholar
Marion, G., Smith, L. A., Swain, D. L., Davidson, R. S. & Hutchings, M. R. (2008). Agent-based modelling of foraging behaviour: the impact of spatial heterogeneity on disease risks from faeces in grazing systems. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 146, 507–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marley, C. L., Fraser, M. D., Davies, D. A., Rees, M. E., Vale, J. E. & Forbes, A. B. (2006). The effect of mixed or sequential grazing of cattle and sheep on the faecal egg counts and growth rates of weaned lambs when treated with anthelmintics. Veterinary Parasitology 142, 134–141.Google Scholar
Nicol, A. M. (1997). The application of mixed grazing. In Proceedings of the XVIII International Grassland Congress (Eds Buchanan-Smith, J. G., Bailey, L. D. & McCaughey, P.), p. 525. Winipeg, Canada: International Grassland Congress.Google Scholar
Niezen, J. H., Charleston, W. A. G., Hodgson, J., Mackay, A. D. & Leathwick, D. M. (1996). Controlling internal parasites in grazing ruminants without recourse to anthelmintics: approaches, experiences and prospects. International Journal for Parasitology 26, 983–992.Google Scholar
Nolan, T. (1996). Animal–vegetation relations which optimise production, utilisation and protection of natural resources: an African experience. African Journal of Range and Forage Science 13, 42–48.Google Scholar
Nolan, T. & Connolly, J. (1976). Mixed grazing of cattle and sheep (abstract). Animal Production 22, 148.Google Scholar
Nolan, T. & Connolly, J. (1977). Mixed stocking by sheep and steers – a review. Herbage Abstracts 47, 367–374.Google Scholar
Nolan, T. & Connolly, J. (1988). Irish research on mixed grazing by cattle and sheep. I. 15 years of results (in French). Fourrages 113, 57–82.Google Scholar
Nolan, T. & Connolly, J. (1989). Mixed v. mono-grazing by steers and sheep. Animal Production 48, 519–533.Google Scholar
Nolan, T., Pulina, G., Sikosana, J. L. N. & Connolly, J. (1999). Mixed animal type grazing research under temperate and semi-arid conditions. Outlook on Agriculture 28, 117–128.Google Scholar
Ocokoljic, S., Trajic, D., Resanovic, R. & Pavlovic, S. (1969). Investigations of the possibility of efficient use of natural pastures. Veterinaria, Saroj 18, 87–98.Google Scholar
Owen, I. L. (1998). Mixed grazing of sheep and cattle in the highlands of Papua New Guinea and its effect on worm burdens of sheep. Science in New Guinea 24, 11–22.Google Scholar
Reynolds, P. J., Bond, J., Carson, G. E., Jackson, C., Hart, R. H. & Lindhal, I. L. (1971). Co-grazing of sheep and cattle on orchard grass sward. Agronomy Journal 63, 533–536.Google Scholar
Rinaldi, L., Veneziano, V. & Cringoli, G. (2007). Dairy goat production and the importance of gastrointestinal strongyle parasitism. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 101, 745–746.Google Scholar
Sauvant, D., Schmidely, P., Daudin, J. J. & St-Pierre, N. R. (2008). Meta-analyses of experimental data in animal nutrition. Animal 2, 1203–1214.Google Scholar
Schichowski, C., Moors, E. & Gauly, M. (2010). Influence of weaning age and an experimental Haemonchus contortus infection on behaviour and growth rates of lambs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 125, 103–108.Google Scholar
Torres-Acosta, J. F. J. & Hoste, H. (2008). Alternative or improved methods to limit gastro-intestinal parasitism in grazing sheep and goats. Small Ruminant Research 77, 159–173.Google Scholar
Torres-Acosta, J. F. J., Sandoval-Castro, C. A., Hoste, H., Aguilar-Caballero, A. J., Càmara-Sarmiento, R. & Alonso-Diaz, M. A. (2012). Nutritional manipulation of sheep and goats for the control of gastrointestinal nematodes under hot humid and subhumid tropical conditions. Small Ruminant Research 103, 28–40.Google Scholar
Walker, D. E. K. (1954). Meat production per acre. In Proceedings of the Ruakura Farmers Conference, pp. 17–27. Wk.Google Scholar
Wright, I. A., Jones, J. R., Davies, D. A., Davidson, G. R. & Vale, J. E. (2006). The effect of sward surface height on the response to mixed grazing by cattle and sheep. Animal Science 82, 271–276.Google Scholar