Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:38:37.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Plant population, shading and thinning studies in wheat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. W. Willey
Affiliation:
University of Reading, Berkshire, England
R. Holliday
Affiliation:
University of Leeds, Yorkshire, England

Summary

Three wheat experiments are described in which a range of plant populations were shaded during different periods of development; in two of the experiments plant thinning was also carried out at a number of growth stages. Shading during the period of ear development caused an appreciable decrease in grain yield by decreasing the number of grains per ear. Shading during the grain filling period also reduced grain yield, this being brought about by decreased grain size. Thus in contrast to the barley experiments reported earlier (Willey & Holhday, 1971), these particular results gave no indication of a potential surplus of carbohydrate for grain filling and an associated limited ear capacity. However, when plant thinning was carried out at anthesis to make more carbohydrate available for grain filling in the remaining ears, grain yield per ear did not increase. It is argued, therefore, that grain yield probably was determined at least partly by a limited ear capacity. Plant thinning at earlier stages showed how the development of competition during the ear development period progressively reduced the potential capacity of the ear; the greater competition of higher plant populations accelerated this reduction in ear potential.

From an examination of the effects of plant population, it is suggested that the number of grains per ear is the component having greatest influence on the decline in grain yield at above-optimum populations. The possible importance of the number of grains per unit area as an indicator of ear capacity on an area basis, and as a determinant of grain yield per unit area, is emphasized. A close relationship between grain yield per unit area and number of grains per unit area is illustrated for a number of plant-population response curves, and it is suggested that the decrease in grain yield at high populations is probably determined by a decrease in the number of grains per unit area. Evidence is presented to substantiate the idea put forward in the barley paper that this decrease in the number of grains per unit area may be attributable more to a lower production of total dry matter by the high populations during the later stages of ear development, than to an unfavourable partitioning of such dry matter between the ear and the rest of the plant.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bonnett, O. T. (1936). The development of the wheat spike. J. agric. Res. 53, 445–51.Google Scholar
Bremner, P. M. & Ingham, A. P. (1960). Some aspects of ear development in winter wheat. Report of the School of Agriculture, University of Nottingham, England, p. 47.Google Scholar
Donald, C. M. (1963). Competition among crop and pasture plants. Adv. Agron. 15, 1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliday, B. & Willey, R. W. (1969). Variety potential in cereals and its improvement. Agric. Prog. 44, 5677.Google Scholar
Kirby, E. J. M. (1969). The effect of sowing date and plant density on barley. Ann. appl. Biol. 63, 513–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puckridge, D. W. (1968). Competition for light and its effect on leaf and spikelet development of wheat plants. Aust. J. agric. Res. 18, 191201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puckridge, D. W. & Donald, C. M. (1969). Competition among wheat plants sown at a wide range of densities. Aust. J. agric. Res. 19, 193211.Google Scholar
Thorne, G. N. (1962 a). Effect of applying nitrogen to cereals in the spring or at ear emergence. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 58, 8996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorne, G. N. (1962 b). Survival of tillers and distribution of dry matter between ear and shoot of barley varieties. Ann. Bot., N.S. 26, 3754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorne, G. N. (1963). Varietal differences in photosynthesis of ears and leaves of barley. Ann. Bot., N.S. 27, 155–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorne, G. N. (1965). Photosynthesis of ears and flag leaves of wheat and barley. Ann. Bot., N.S. 29, 317–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D. J. & French, S. A. W. (1961). Competition within a wheat crop. Rothamsted Exp. Sta. Rep. for 1960, p. 94.Google Scholar
Willex, R. W. & Dent, J. D. (1969). The supply and storage of carbohydrate in wheat and barley. Agric. Prog. 44, 4355.Google Scholar
Willey, R. W. & Holliday, R. (1971). Plant population and shading studies in barley. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 77, 445–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar