Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:20:39.794Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Protein-bound iodine, erythrocytes and haemoglobin in the blood of beef steers and their relation to rate of gain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. C. Luitingh
H. C. Luitingh
Affiliation:
Livestock and Meat Industries Control Board, Pretoria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The serum protein-bound iodine concentration in the blood of beef steers varied between animals and was not correlated with the daily gain during the fattening period. The data, however, are insufficient to arrive at a definite conclusion.

The average erythrocyte counts of the blood were 7·86 (range: 5·89–8·75), 8·59 (range: 6·55–10·15), and 8·54 (range: 5·23–9·62) million per mm.3 for steers of 14, 26 and 38 months of age. The difference between the counts of the yearlings and that of the other age groups was statistically significant. The red cell fraction increased with live weight over the range 700–1230 lb. Although a significant (P < 0·01) correlation was found between the number of erythrocytes in the blood and the daily gain of the steers, the erythrocyte count cannot be employed to predict the possible gaining ability of single beef animals.

The haemoglobin content of the blood was found to be 14·02 (range: 9·8–17·4) in the case of the yearlings, 14·68 (range: 11·8–18·5)and 14·61 (range: 7·95–16·85) g./100 ml. blood in the case of the 2-year-olds and 3-year-olds respectively. These differences between age groups were not significant.

A correlation of 0·31 was found between the haemoglobin content and live weight of steers within the weight range of 600–1230 lb. The data suggest that for every 100% increase in weight, the haemoglobin in the blood increased by 17%. No correlation was found between the haemoglobin content and the rate of gain of the steers.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 58 , Issue 3 , June 1962 , pp. 287 - 290
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arthaud, R. L., Shultze, A. B., Koch, R. M. & Arthaud, V. H. (1959). J. Anim. Sci. 18, 314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brookes, H. J. & Hughes, J. S. (1932). J. Nutr. 5, 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, J. H., Jones, I. R. & Haag, J. R. (1952). J. Dairy Sci. 35, 661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canham, A. S. (1930). Vet. Serv. Anim. Ind. Onderstepoort, S. Afr. p. 531.Google Scholar
Committee on Animal Nutrition (1950). Rep. Nat. Res. Coun. U.S.A. no. IV.Google Scholar
Dukes, H. H. (1955). The Physiology of Domestic Animals, 7th ed.London: Baillière, Tindall and Cox.Google Scholar
Gawienowski, A. M., Mayer, D. I. & Lasley, J. F. (1955). J. Anim. Sci. 14, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, R. E., Riddell, W. H. & Hughes, J. S. (1932). J. Agric. Res. 44, 357.Google Scholar
Irvine, C. H. G. (1958). J.Amer. Vet. Med. Ass. 133, 97.Google Scholar
Kunkel, H. O., Colby, R. W. & Lyman, C. M. (1953). J. Anim. Sci. 12, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunkel, H. O., Green, G. G., Riggs, J. K., Smith, R. L. & Schrode, M. C. (1957). Abstr. Proc. 49th Ann. Meeting Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod. In J. Anim. Sci. 16, 1030.Google Scholar
Lennon, H. D. Jnr. & Mixner, J. P. (1959). J. Dairy Sci. 42, 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, R. C. & Ralston, N. P. (1953). J. Dairy Sci. 36, 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, R. A., Gilmore, L. D., Curtis, G. M. & Rife, D. C. (1952). J. Dairy Sci. 35, 603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, R. A., van Arsdell, W. A., MacVicar, R. & Ross, O. B. (1952 a). Tech. Bull. Okla. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. T. 43.Google Scholar
MacDonald, M. A., Krueger, H. & Bogart, R. (1956). Tech. Bull. Ore. St. Coll. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 36.Google Scholar
McCay, C. M. (1931). J. Dairy Sci. 14, 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheard, C., Sanford, A. H. & Osterberg, A. E. (1933). Amer. J. Anim. Path. 3, 405.Google Scholar
Shultze, A. B. (1955). Growth, 19, 141.Google Scholar
Verbeek, W. A. (1958). D.Sc. (Agric.) thesis Univ. Stellenbosch.Google Scholar
Werner, B. (1946). Amer. J. Vet. Res. 7, 450.Google Scholar