Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:27:58.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The provision of grower and breeder information on the frost susceptibility of wheat in Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2019

N. A. Cocks Open the ORCID record for N. A. Cocks [Opens in a new window] ,
T. J. March ,
T. B. Biddulph ,
A. B. Smith  and
B. R. Cullis
N. A. Cocks*
Affiliation:
Centre for Bioinformatics and Biometrics, National Institute for Applied Statistics Research Australia, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia
T. J. March
Affiliation:
University of Adelaide, School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, SA, Australia
T. B. Biddulph
Affiliation:
Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Agriculture and Food, WA, Australia
A. B. Smith
Affiliation:
Centre for Bioinformatics and Biometrics, National Institute for Applied Statistics Research Australia, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia
B. R. Cullis
Affiliation:
Centre for Bioinformatics and Biometrics, National Institute for Applied Statistics Research Australia, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia
*
Author for correspondence: N. A. Cocks, E-mail: ncocks@uow.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The frost susceptibility of Australian commercial cereal crops, in particular wheat and barley, has become an economically devastating issue for growers. The relative risk to frost damage of the currently available varieties is obtained through testing varieties in a series of field experiments at locations susceptible to frost events (FEs). The experimental design, measurement protocols and resultant data from these frost expression experiments (FEEs) are complex due to the unpredictability of the timing and severity of FEs, and the maturity of the plants at the time of the events. Design and protocol complexities include the use of multiple sowing dates and the recording of plant maturity. Data difficulties include a high degree of unbalance, and in the instance of multiple frosts in a FEE, there is a longitudinal aspect. A linear mixed model analysis was adopted to accommodate these characteristics of individual FEEs and the multi-environment trial analysis of 17 FEEs. Finally, an approach is demonstrated for dissemination of results that are of use to both growers and breeders.

Keywords

Frost susceptibilitylinear mixed modelslongitudinal datamulti-environment trialsREML
Type
Crops and Soils Research Paper
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 157 , Issue 5 , July 2019 , pp. 382 - 398
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Present address: Rijk Zwaan Australia Pty Ltd, Daylesford, VIC, Australia.

References

Al-Issawi, M, Rihan, HZ, El-Sarkassy, M and Fuller, MP (2013) Frost hardiness expression and characterisation in wheat at ear emergence. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 199, 66–74.Google Scholar
Atkinson, AC (1987) Plots, Transformations, and Regression: An Introduction to Graphical Methods of Diagnostic Regression Analysis. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bailey, RA (2008) Design of Comparative Experiments. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barton, DA, Cantrill, LC, Law, AM, Phillips, CG, Sutton, BG and Overall, RL (2014) Chilling to zero degrees disrupts pollen formation but not meiotic microtubule arrays in Triticum aestivum L. Plant, Cell and Environment 37, 2781–2794.Google Scholar
Baxter, N (2015) Trials deliver frost-susceptibility data. GroundCover 115, 2 March 2015. Available at https://grdc.com.au/resources-and-publications/groundcover/ground-cover-issue-115-marapr-2015/trials-deliver-frost-susceptibility-data (Accessed 6 September 2019).Google Scholar
Brien, CJ and Demetrio, CGB (2009) Formulating mixed models for experiments, including longitudinal experiments. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 14, 253–280.Google Scholar
Bueno Filho, JSS and Gilmour, SG (2007) Block designs for random treatment effects. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 137, 1446–1451.Google Scholar
Butler, DG, Cullis, BR, Gilmour, AR, Gogel, BG and Thompson, R (2017). ASReml-R Reference Manual Version 4. Hemel Hempstead, UK: VSN International Ltd.Google Scholar
Cullis, BR and Smith, AB (2019) REML to ML. Working Paper 10–19, NIASRA Working Paper Series. Wollongong, Australia: University of Wollongong. Available at https://niasra.uow.edu.au/content/groups/public/@web/@inf/@math/documents/doc/uow260514.pdf (Accessed 6 September 2019).Google Scholar
Diggle, PJ and Chetwynd, AG (2011) Statistics and Scientific Method: An Introduction for Students and Researchers. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frederiks, TM, Christopher, JT, Sutherland, MW and Borrell, AK (2015) Post-head-emergence frost in wheat and barley: defining the problem, assessing the damage, and identifying resistance. Journal of Experimental Botany 66, 3487–3498.Google Scholar
Gogel, B, Smith, A and Cullis, B (2018) Comparison of a one- and two-stage mixed model analysis of Australia's National Variety Trial Southern Region wheat data. Euphytica 214, article no. 44. doi: 10.1007/s10681-018-2116-4.Google Scholar
Lee, Y, Nelder, JA and Pawitan, Y (2006) Generalised Linear Models with Random Effects. Unified Analysis via H-Likelihood. CRC Monographs on Statistics; Applied Probability. Boca Raton, FL, USA: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
R Core Team (2015) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Reinheimer, JL, Barr, AR and Eglinton, JK (2004) QTL mapping of chromosomal regions conferring reproductive frost tolerance in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 109, 1267–1274.Google Scholar
Smith, AB and Cullis, BR (2018) Plant breeding selection tools built on factor analytic mixed models for multi-environment trial data. Euphytica 214, article no. 143. doi: 10.1007/s10681-018-2220-5.Google Scholar
Smith, A, Cullis, BR and Thompson, R (2001) Analyzing variety by environment data using multiplicative mixed models and adjustments for spatial field trend. Biometrics 57, 1138–1147.Google Scholar
Smith, AB, Ganesalingam, A, Kuchel, H and Cullis, BR (2015) Factor analytic mixed models for the provision of grower information from national crop variety testing programs. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 128, 55–72.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, GN and Rogers, CE (1973) Symbolic description of factorial models for analysis of variance. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C: Applied Statistics 22, 392–399.Google Scholar
Zadoks, JC, Chang, TT and Konzak, CF (1974) A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415–421.Google Scholar