Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:52:47.038Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The relation between the silica content of the diet and the excretion of silica by sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

L. H. P. Jones
Affiliation:
Division of Plant Industry, C.S.I.R.O., c/o School of Agriculture, University of Melbourne, Victoria
K. A. Handreck
Affiliation:
Division of Plant Industry, C.S.I.R.O., c/o School of Agriculture, University of Melbourne, Victoria

Extract

Three diets, with silica contents ranging from 0·10–2·84% SiO2 in the dry matter, were fed to sheep and the distribution of silica between the faeces and urine was measured, together with the concentrations of silica in the rumen liquor and the blood. The sum of the amounts of silica excreted in the urine and faeces was within 1% of the amounts ingested. The amounts excreted in the urine increased with increasing silica content of the diet but reached no more than 205 mg. SiO2/day, apparently being limited by the solubility of silica in the rumen. Since the concentration of silica in the blood remained practically constant it is concluded that the silica which enters the blood stream from the alimentary tract passes rapidly into the urine. The amounts of silica excreted in the urine represented small proportions only of the amounts ingested and since the recoveries of silica in the faeces were so nearly complete it is suggested that silica be re-examined as an indicator for digestibility studies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, G. B., Heston, W. M. & Iler, R. K. (1954). J. Phys. Chem. 58, 453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, G. & Jones, L. H. P. (1961). Nature, Lond., 189, 682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, G., Jones, L. H. P. & Milne, A. A. (1961). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 12, 473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beeson, W. M., Pence, J. W. & Holm, G. C. (1943). Amer. J. Vet. Res. 4, 120.Google Scholar
Dick, A. T. & Mules, M. W. (1954). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 5, 345.Google Scholar
Druce, E. & Willcox, J. S. (1949). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 17, 188.Google Scholar
Forman, S. A. & Sauer, F. (1962). Canad. J. Anim. Sci. 42, 9.Google Scholar
Gallup, W. D. & Kuhlman, A. H. (1931). J. Agric. Res. 42, 665.Google Scholar
Gallup, W. D. & Kuhlman, A. H. (1936). J. Agric. Res. 52, 889.Google Scholar
Gallup, W. D., Hobbs, C. S. & Briggs, H. M. (1945). J. Anim. Sci. 4, 68.Google Scholar
Iler, R. K. (1955). The Colloid Chemistry of Silica and Silicates. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, L. H. P. & Handreck, K. A. (1965). Plant and Soil (in the Press).Google Scholar
Jones, L. H. P., Milne, A. A. & Wadham, S. M. (1963). Plant and Soil, 18, 358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, E. J., Stacy, B. D., Holt, P. F., Yates, D. M. & Pickles, D. (1955). Analyst, 80, 441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, E. J., Stantial, H. & Dolan, M. (1933). Biochem. J. 27, 1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knott, J. C, Murer, H. K. & Hodgson, E. R. (1936). J. Agric. Res. 53, 553.Google Scholar
Krauskopf, K. B. (1959). In Silica in Sediments, ed. Ireland, H. A.. Special Publ. 7, Soc. Econ. Paleont. Miner., Oklahoma.Google Scholar
Pujszo, K., Seidler, S., Ziolecka, A. & Zolkiewski, A. (1959). Rocz. Nauk rol. 74B, 591.Google Scholar
Sauer, F., Laughland, D. H. & Davidson, W. M. (1959a). Oanad. J. Biochem. Physiol. 37, 183.Google Scholar
Sauer, F., Laughland, D. H. & Davidson, W. M. (1959b). Canad. J. Biochem. Physiol. 37, 1173.Google Scholar
Strickland, J. D. H. (1952). J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 74, 872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, E. J. (1962). Trace Elements in Human and Animal Nutrition. New York: Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
Weston, R. H. (1959). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 10, 865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildt, E. (1874). J. Landw. 22, 1.Google Scholar
Wildt, E. (1877). Landw. Versuchsw. 20, 21.Google Scholar