Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T12:58:45.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The relationship between the grazing efficiency and the production, morphology and nutritional traits of perennial ryegrass varieties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2020

T. Tubritt Open the ORCID record for T. Tubritt [Opens in a new window] ,
L. Delaby ,
T. J. Gilliland  and
M. O'Donovan
T. Tubritt
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Animal and Grassland Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland The Institute for Global Food Security, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, N. Ireland
L. Delaby
Affiliation:
INRAE, AgroCampus Ouest, Physiologie, Environnement et Génétique pour l'Animal et les Systèmes d'Elevage, 35590Saint-Gilles, France
T. J. Gilliland
Affiliation:
The Institute for Global Food Security, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, N. Ireland
M. O'Donovan*
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Animal and Grassland Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland
*
Author for correspondence: M. O'Donovan, E-mail: Michael.ODonovan@teagasc.ie
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ruminant grazing systems aim to optimize the proportion of grazed forage within the diet and perennial ryegrass grazing efficiency influences both the quantity and quality of herbage utilized. The objective of this study was to examine morphological and chemical plant characteristics and test for any associations with grazing efficiency. The leading perennial ryegrass varieties from the 2016 Irish Recommended List were established in a plot study and rotationally grazed by dairy cows over 3 years. Pre-grazing plant characteristics were measured and related to grazing efficiency, as measured by ‘residual grazed height’. Data were analysed using the PROC MIXED procedure to test for trait differences between varieties, and their corresponding ploidy and heading categorizations. Traits displaying significant variety variability were then tested for their correlation to grazing efficiency using the PROC GLM procedure. Tetraploid varieties exhibited superior grazing efficiency over diploids, due to their superior performance in traits correlated with grazing efficiency. Increasing organic matter digestibility and leaf proportion and decreasing neutral detergent fibre and stem height within the sward were found to increase grazing efficiency. The observed link between these plant traits and grazing efficiency indicates a possibility that they could be used to develop proxy measures to aid breeders to select for, and evaluators to measure, varietal grazing efficiency without involving animal assessments. It was concluded that this would make it logistically practical to assess large numbers of varieties in small plot trials to both breed and evaluate perennial ryegrass varieties for superior grazing efficiency.

Keywords

Perennial ryegrassvarietygrazing efficiencyplant morphologynutritive value
Type
Crops and Soils Research Paper
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 158 , Issue 7 , September 2020 , pp. 583 - 593
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balocchi, OA and López, IF (2009) Herbage production, nutritive value and grazing preference of diploid and tetraploid perennial ryegrass cultivars (Lolium perenne L.). Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 69, 331–339, doi:10.4067/S0718-58392009000300005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, PD, McGilloway, DA, Laidlaw, AS and Mayne, CS (2003) The effect of sward structure as influenced by ryegrass genotype on bite dimensions and short-term intake rate by dairy cows. Grass and Forage Science 58, 2–11, doi:10.1046/j.1365-2494.2003.00345.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthram, G and Grant, SA (1984) Defoliation of ryegrass-dominated swards by sheep. Grass and Forage Science 39, 211–219.10.1111/j.1365-2494.1984.tb01685.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beecher, M, Hennessy, D, Boland, TM, McEvoy, M, O'Donovan, M and Lewis, E (2015) The variation in morphology of perennial ryegrass cultivars throughout the grazing season and effects on organic matter digestibility. Grass and Forage Science 70, 19–29, doi:10.1111/gfs.12081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, GA, Gilliland, TJ, Grogan, D, Watson, S and O'Kiely, P (2012) Assessment of herbage yield and quality traits of perennial ryegrasses from a national variety evaluation scheme. The Journal of Agricultural Science 151, 331–346, doi:10.1017/S0021859612000251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buxton, DR and Redfearn, DD (1997) Plant limitations to fiber digestion and utilization. The Journal of Nutrition 127, 814S–818S, doi:10.1093/jn/127.5.814S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byrne, N, Gilliland, TJ, McHugh, N, Delaby, L, Geoghegan, A and O'Donovan, M (2017) Establishing phenotypic performance of grass varieties on Irish grassland farms. The Journal of Agricultural Science 155, 1633–1645, doi:10.1017/S0021859617000740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, N, Gilliland, TJ, Delaby, L, Cummins, D and O'Donovan, M (2018) Understanding factors associated with the grazing efficiency of perennial ryegrass varieties. European Journal of Agronomy 101, 101–108, doi:10.1016/j.eja.2018.09.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camlin, M and Stewart, R (1976) The assessment of persistence and its application to the evaluation of early perennial ryegrass cultivars. Grass and Forage Science 31, 1–6, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2494.1976.tb01107.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cashman, PA, McEvoy, M, Gilliland, TJ and O'Donovan, M (2016) A comparison between cutting and animal grazing for dry-matter yield, quality and tiller density of perennial ryegrass cultivars. Grass and Forage Science 71, 112–122, doi:10.1111/gfs.12166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casler, MD and Vogel, KP (1999) Accomplishments and impact from breeding for increased forage nutritional value. Crop Science 39, 12–20, doi:10.2135/cropsci1999.0011183X003900010003x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casler, MD, Jung, HG and Coblentz, WK (2008) Clonal selection for lignin and etherified ferulates in three perennial grasses. Crop Science 48, 424–433, doi:10.2135/cropsci2007.04.0229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castle, M (1976) A simple disc instrument for estimating herbage yield. Grass and Forage Science 31, 37–40.10.1111/j.1365-2494.1976.tb01113.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curran, J, Delaby, L, Kennedy, E, Murphy, JP, Boland, TM and O'Donovan, M (2010) Sward characteristics, grass dry matter intake and milk production performance are affected by pre-grazing herbage mass and pasture allowance. Livestock Science 127, 144–154.10.1016/j.livsci.2009.09.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DAFM (2016) Grass and White Clover varieties Irish Recommended List 2016. Publication produced by the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Ireland. Available online from: https://www.agriculture.gov.ie/media/migration/publications/2016/GrassWhiteCloverRecom2016080216.pdf.Google Scholar
Delaby, L, Peyraud, J-L, Bouttier, A and Peccatte, J-R (1998) Effet d'une réduction simultanée de la fertilisation azotée et du chargement sur les performances des vaches laitières et la valorisation du pâturage. Annales de Zootechnie 47, 17–39, https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00889711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillon, P, Roche, J, Shalloo, L and Horan, B (2005) Optimising financial return from grazing in temperate pastures. Utilisation of grazed grass in temperate animal systems. Proceedings of a Satellite Workshop of the XXth International Grassland Congress, pp. 131–147, doi:10.3920/978-90-8686-554-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finneran, E, Crosson, P, O'Kiely, P, Shalloo, L, Forristal, PD and Wallace, M (2012) Economic modelling of an integrated grazed and conserved perennial ryegrass forage production system. Grass and Forage Science 67, 162–176, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2494.2011.00832.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flores, ER, Laca, EA, Griggs, TC and Demment, MW (1993) Sward height and vertical morphological differentiation determine cattle bite dimensions. Agronomy Journal 85, 527–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, TDA (1988) Researching the plant-animal interface: the investigation of ingestive behavior in grazing animals. Journal of Animal Science 66, 2369–2379, doi:10.2527/jas1988.6692369x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Francis, SA, Chapman, DF, Doyle, PT and Leury, BJ (2006) Dietary preferences of cows offered choices between white clover and high sugar and typical perennial ryegrass cultivars. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 1579–1587, doi:10.1071/EA04085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garry, B, O'Donovan, M, Beecher, M, Delaby, L, Fleming, C, Baumont, R and Lewis, E (2018) Predicting in vivo digestibility of perennial ryegrass using the neutral detergent cellulase method: updating the equation. Grassland Science in Europe 23, 194–196.Google Scholar
Gilliland, TJ, Barrett, PD, Mann, RL, Agnew, RE and Fearon, AM (2002) Canopy morphology and nutritional quality traits as potential grazing value indicators for Lolium perenne varieties. The Journal of Agricultural Science 139, 257–273.10.1017/S0021859602002575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilliland, TJ, Annicchiarico, P, Julier, B and Ghesquière, M (2019) Revising official herbage cultivar evaluation to meet evolving EU stakeholder needs. Grassland Science in Europe 24, 19.Google Scholar
Grant, SA, Barthram, G and Torvell, L (1981) Components of regrowth in grazed and cut Lolium perenne swards. Grass and Forage Science 36, 155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, W, Matthew, C, Lee, J and Chapman, D (2017) Is there a tiller morphology ideotype for yield differences in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.)? Grass and Forage Science 72, 700–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanrahan, L, McHugh, N, Hennessy, T, Moran, B, Kearney, R, Wallace, M and Shalloo, L (2018) Factors associated with profitability in pasture-based systems of milk production. Journal of Dairy Science 101, 5474–5485, doi:10.3168/jds.2017-13223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horan, B and Roche, JR (2020) Defining resilience in pasture-based dairy-farm systems in temperate regions. Animal Production Science 60, 55–66, doi:10.1071/AN18601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, LA and Brougham, RW (1967) Some changes in the structure of a perennial ryegrass sward frequently but leniently defoliated during the summer. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 10, 397–404, doi:10.1080/00288233.1967.10426368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jewiss, O. (1993) Shoot development and number. Sward Measurement Handbook, 2nd edition edn, Reading, UK: The British Grassland Society, pp. 99–120.Google Scholar
Jung, HG and Allen, MS (1995) Characteristics of plant cell walls affecting intake and digestibility of forages by ruminants. Journal of Animal Science 73, 2774–2790, doi:10.2527/1995.7392774x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, E, O'Donovan, M, Murphy, JP, Delaby, L and O'Mara, FP (2007) Effect of spring grazing date and stocking rate on sward characteristics and dairy cow production during midlactation. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 2035–2046, doi:10.3168/jds.2006-368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macdonald, K, Penno, J, Lancaster, J and Roche, J (2008) Effect of stocking rate on pasture production, milk production, and reproduction of dairy cows in pasture-based systems. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 2151–2163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macdonald, K, Glassey, C and Rawnsley, R (2010) The emergence, development and effectiveness of decision rules for pasture based dairy systems. Proceedings of the 4th Australasian Dairy Science Symposium: Meeting the Challenges for Pasture-Based Dairying, pp. 199–209.Google Scholar
Mayne, CS, Newberry, RD, Woodcock, SCF and Wilkins, RJ (1987) Effect of grazing severity on grass utilization and milk production of rotationally grazed dairy cows. Grass and Forage Science 42, 59–72, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2494.1987.tb02091.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, B, Pierce, KM, Delaby, L, Brennan, A, Fleming, C and Horan, B (2013) The effect of stocking rate and calving date on grass production, utilization and nutritive value of the sward during the grazing season. Grass and Forage Science 68, 364–377, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2494.2012.00904.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonagh, J (2017) Improving the productivity of perennial ryegrass pastures: genetic gain, genotype × management interactions and plant traits. PhD Thesis, Queen's University Belfast.Google Scholar
McDonagh, J, McEvoy, M, Gilliland, TJ and O’ Donovan, M. (2015) Milk production reponses of lactating dairy cows to sward structure differences between pereenial ryegrass varieties. Irish Grassland and Animal Production Agricultural Research Forum 41, pp. 38.Google Scholar
McDonagh, J, O'Donovan, M, McEvoy, M and Gilliland, TJ (2016) Genetic gain in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) varieties 1973 to 2013. Euphytica 212, 187–199, doi:10.1007/s10681-016-1754-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, LA, Moorby, JM, Davies, DR, Humphreys, MO, Scollan, ND, MacRae, JC and Theodorou, MK (2001) Increased concentration of water-soluble carbohydrate in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.): milk production from late-lactation dairy cows. Grass and Forage Science 56, 383–394, doi:10.1046/j.1365-2494.2001.00288.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, RJ (1995) The effects of sward height, bulk density and tiller structure on the ingestive behaviour of red deer and Romney sheep. PhD Thesis, Massey University.Google Scholar
Oba, M and Allen, MS (1999) Evaluation of the importance of the digestibility of neutral detergent fiber from forage: effects on Dry matter intake and milk yield of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 82, 589–596, doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75271-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Donovan, M and Delaby, L (2005) A comparison of perennial ryegrass cultivars differing in heading date and grass ploidy with spring calving dairy cows grazed at two different stocking rates. Animal Research 54, 337–350, doi:10.51/animres:2005027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donovan, M, Connolly, J, Dillon, P, Rath, M and Stakelum, G (2002) Visual assessment of herbage mass. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research 41, 201–211, Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/25562464.Google Scholar
O'Donovan, M, McHugh, N, McEvoy, M, Grogan, D and Shalloo, L (2016) Combining seasonal yield, silage dry matter yield, quality and persistency in an economic index to assist perennial ryegrass variety selection. The Journal of Agricultural Science 155, 556–568, doi:10.1017/S0021859616000587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donovan, M, Hennessy, D and Creighton, P (2018) Ruminant grassland production systems in Ireland. Grassland Science in Europe 23, 17–25.Google Scholar
Parsons, AJ, Edwards, GR, Newton, PCD, Chapman, DF, Caradus, JR, Rasmussen, S and Rowarth, JS (2011) Past lessons and future prospects: plant breeding for yield and persistence in cool-temperate pastures. Grass and Forage Science 66, 153–172, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2494.2011.00785.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peyraud, J, Comeron, E, Wade, M and Lemaire, G (1996) The effect of daily herbage allowance, herbage mass and animal factors upon herbage intake by grazing dairy cows. Annales de Zootechnie 45, 201–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsbottom, G, Horan, B, Berry, DP and Roche, JR (2015) Factors associated with the financial performance of spring-calving, pasture-based dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science 98, 3526–3540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sampoux, J-P, Baudouin, P, Bayle, B, Béguier, V, Bourdon, P, Chosson, J-F, Deneufbourg, F, Galbrun, C, Ghesquière, M and Noël, D (2011) Breeding perennial grasses for forage usage: an experimental assessment of trait changes in diploid perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) cultivars released in the last four decades. Field Crops Research 123, 117–129.10.1016/j.fcr.2011.05.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stilmant, D, Limbourg, P and Lecomte, P (2005) Assessment of cattle preference for perennial ryegrass varieties in association with white clover. Does white clover content interfere? Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 191, 233–240, doi:10.1111/j.1439-037X.2005.00164.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, R and Minson, D (1972) The relationship between voluntary intake and mean apparent retention time in the rumen. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 23, 871–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tubritt, T, Delaby, L, Gilliland, T and O'Donovan, M (2020) An investigation into the grazing efficiency of perennial ryegrass varieties. Grass and Forage Science 75, 253–265. doi:10.1111/gfs.12481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuñon, G, Kennedy, E, Horan, B, Hennessy, D, Lopez-Villalobos, N, Kemp, P, Brennan, A and O'Donovan, M (2014) Effect of grazing severity on perennial ryegrass herbage production and sward structural characteristics throughout an entire grazing season. Grass and Forage Science 69, 104–118, doi:10.1111/gfs.12048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wade, M, Peyraud, J, Lemaire, G and Comeron, E (1989) Section 9: Vegetation dynamics and ecophysiology: plant-animal relationships. The dynamics of daily area and depth of grazing and herbage intake of cows in a five day paddock system. 16. International grassland congress. 16. Congres international des herbages, Nice (France), 4–11 October 1989.Google Scholar
Wilkins, P and Humphreys, M (2003) Progress in breeding perennial forage grasses for temperate agriculture. The Journal of Agricultural Science 140, 129–150, doi:10.1017/s0021859603003058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wims, CM, McEvoy, M, Delaby, L, Boland, TM and O'Donovan, M (2013) Effect of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) cultivars on the milk yield of grazing dairy cows. Animal 7, 410–421, doi:10.1017/s1751731112001814.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wims, CM, Ludemann, CI, Phillips, H and Chapman, DF (2017) The economic value to dairy systems of genetic gains in the nutritive value of perennial ryegrass in grass–clover pastures. Animal Production Science 57, 1357–1365, doi:10.1071/AN16487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar