Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:06:54.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Residual effects of N, P and K applied to cotton on following crops of sorghum, dolichos and wheat in the Sudan Gezira

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. O. Burhan
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Corporation, Wad Medani, Sudan
M. B. Said
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Corporation, Wad Medani, Sudan

Summary

Residual effects of N, P and K applied to cotton on the following crops of dura (Sorghum vulgare), lubia (Dolichos lablab) and wheat (Triticum vulgare) were investigated using data obtained over a 30-year period from a factorial field experiment including various levels of the three nutrients. The three crops differed in their response to residual N, P and K. Dura and wheat, being nitrogen depleters highly responsive to fertilizer nitrogen, were consistently affected by residual N. The residual effects of N on grain and straw yields of both dura and wheat were significant in all seasons and the effects were proportional to the amount of N applied to the preceding cotton. There were indications, however, that a much greater part of the N applied in the preceding year was not available to the succeeding crop. Residual P did not have a significant effect on dura but it varied in its effect on the different components of wheat in different seasons. Residual K did not have any effect on dura or wheat. Data on nutrient uptake and composition of wheat tended to support the yield responses. Contrary to the response of the two cereal crops lubia, being a nitrogen fixing legume, did not respond to the effect of residual N and was consistently affected by residual P. Residual K had a slight effect on lubia in only a few seasons.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anon. (19421958). Residual nitrogen experiment. Annual Reports. Gezira Agricultural Research Station, Sudan.Google Scholar
Anon. (1967). Standard Practices of Crops on the Gezira Research Farm. Technical Bulletin I {N.S.), Agricultural Research Corporation, Agronomy and Physiology Section, Sudan.Google Scholar
Burhan, H. O. & Mansi, M. G. (1970). Effects of N, P and K on yields of Cotton in the Sudan Gezira. Experimental Agriculture 6, 279–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Geus, J. G. (1967). Fertilizer guide for tropical and subtropical farming. Centre D'Etude de L'Azote, Zurich.Google Scholar
Ishag, H. M. (19631966). Annual Reports. Gezira Agricultural Research Station, Sudan.Google Scholar
Kamprath, E. J. (1967). Residual effect of large application of phosphorus on high phosphorus fixing soils. Agronomy Journal 59, 25–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musa, M. M. & Burhan, H. O. (1974). The relative performance of forage legumes as rotational crops in the Gezira. Experimental Agriculture 10, 131–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narasimhachar, S. G. & Ullal, R. R. (1965). A study of the residual effect of phosphoric acid on laxami cotton at Gadag. Indian Cotton Journal 19, 31–5.Google Scholar
Paauw F., Van Des (1963). Residual effect of nitrogen fertilizer on succeeding crops in a moderate marine climate. Plant and Soil 19, 324–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Said, M. B. (19721973). Annual Report. Gezira Agricultural Research Station, Sudan.Google Scholar
Said, M. B. & Burhan, H. O. (1974). Long-term effects of N, P and K fertilizers on soil properties and nutrient composition of cotton leaves in the Sudan Gezira. African Soils (in the Press).Google Scholar
Senborn, A. & Kastori, R. (1964). Residual effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizers. Abstracted in Soils and Fertilizers (1966), 29, 186.Google Scholar
Widdowson, F. V. & Penny, A. (1965). Experiments measuring the residual effect of N fertilizers. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 65, 195200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar