Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:11:01.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Statistical evaluation of drainage treatments in simple field trials with special reference to former opencast coal mining land

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. Scullion
Affiliation:
University College of Wales Field Laboratory, 23 Plasgwyn Road, Penygroes, Llanelli, Dyfed
A. R. A. Mohammed
Affiliation:
University College of Wales Field Laboratory, 23 Plasgwyn Road, Penygroes, Llanelli, Dyfed
G. A. Ramshaw
Affiliation:
University College of Wales Field Laboratory, 23 Plasgwyn Road, Penygroes, Llanelli, Dyfed

Summary

Drainage trials frequently lack any statistical evaluation of treatment differences, often because of practical difficulties in setting up randomized field experiments. Also, where detailed moisture measurements are carried out the usefulness of such data is small in relation to the workload involved. Procedures are described here which seek to rectify, in part, the above limitations.

Routine drain and surface condition data were analysed. Parallel regression analysis was used to compare drainage response patterns based on linear relationships between rainfall and peak drain flow. A point scoring system allowed treatment effects on surface conditions to be evaluated by x2 analysis.

Artificial drainage seeks to simulate naturally free-draining conditions. In line with this objective, soil moisture contents in the field, on a ‘Field Capacity Day’ (Stewart & Adams, 1968), were related to those at a standard (– 10 KPa) moisture tension typical of free-draining reference sites. Effectiveness of drainage performance was indicated by proximity of field and reference tension moisture contents.

Worked examples of each of the above procedures are provided. The procedures were found to be both sensitive and complementary. The value of the overall approach and its application under more normal agricultural conditions are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, W. A. (1973). The effect of organic matter on the bulk and true density of some uncultivated podzolic soils. Journal of Soil Science 24, 1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuilds, E. C. (1940). A recording water-flow meter. Journal of Scientific Instruments 17, 9394.Google Scholar
Duncan, N. A. (1979). The moisture regimes of six soil series of the Central Lowlands of Scotland. Journal of Soil Science 30, 215233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitton, A., Gibbons, J., Precious, G., Webber, J. & Theobald, G. H. (1958). Experiments on the rehabilitation of opencast coal sites. Experimental Husbandry 4, 5873.Google Scholar
Piper, C. J. (1950). Soil and Plant Analysis. Adelaide: University of Adelaide.Google Scholar
Rands, J. G. (1973). An analysis of drain flows at Field Drainage Experimental Unit Experimental sites. Field Drainage Unit Technical Bulletin 73/11.Google Scholar
Scullion, J. (1984). The assessment of experimental techniques developed to assist the rehabilitation of restored opencast coal mining land. Ph.D. thesis, University Collego of Wales, Aberystwyth.Google Scholar
Scullion, J. & Mohammed, A. R. A. (1986 a). Field drainage experiments and design on former opencast coal mining land. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107, 521528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scullion, J. & Mohammed, A. R. A. (1986 b). Cultivation and drainage performance on former opencast coal mining land. Soil Use and Management (in the Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, V. I. (1981). Rehabilitation of farmland degraded by opencast coal mining. In The Productivity of Restored Land, pp. 1220. Land Decade Educational Council.Google Scholar
Stewart, V. I. & Adams, W. A. (1968). The quantitative description of soil moisture states in natural habitats with special reference to moist soils. In The Measuremental Factors in Terrestrial Ecology (ed. Wadsworth, R. M.), pp. 161173. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Stewart, V. I. & Scullion, J. (1986). Earthworms, soil structure and the rehabilitation of land restored after opencast mining. International Conference on Earthworms in Waste and Environmental Management. Proceedings (in the Press).Google Scholar
Thornton, D. J. (1978). Construction and drainage of some specified sportsfield playing surfaces. Ph.D. thesis, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth.Google Scholar
Trafford, B. D. (1975 a). Drainage experiments and drainage design. In Soil Physical Conditions and Crop Production, pp. 417433. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Trafford, B. D. (1975 b). Improving the design of practical field drainage. Soil Science 119, 334338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trafford, B. D. & Twocock, J. G. (1972). The drainage experiment on Radar opencast coal site. Field Drainage Experimental Unit Technical Bulletin 72/16.Google Scholar
Twocock, J. G. (1970). A preliminary report on the use of hydrographs as an aid to drainage design. Apprendix 12, Field Drainage Experimental Unit Annual Report, 1969, pp. 4957.Google Scholar
Wesseling, J. (1958). The relation between rainfall, drain discharge and the depth of the water-table in tile drained land. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 6, 4760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youngs, E. G. (1983). The contribution of physics to land drainage. Journal of Soil Science 34, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar