Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T17:23:52.449Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A study of growth in calves:II. Relative growth in muscles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. M. Butterfield  and
E. R. Johnson
R. M. Butterfield
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Anatomy, University of Queensland
E. R. Johnson
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Anatomy, University of Queensland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The growth patterns of impetus groups of muscles were mostly not significantly affected by rate of growth of the musculature. One small group – the low/average impetus muscles – had a significantly lower ‘b’ value in the calves fed at a high plane. It appears that under differences of feeding encountered commercially, no changes of practical importance in the relative growth of muscles are likely to be produced which are attributable to rate of growth of the musculature.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 76 , Issue 3 , June 1971 , pp. 457 - 458
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Butterfield, R. M. (1963). Estimation of carcase composition: the anatomical approach. In Symposium on carcase composition and appraisal of meat animals (ed. Tribe, D. E.), 4.1.4.13. Melbourne, Australia: C.S.I.R.O.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M. & Berg, R. T. (1966 a). A nutritional effect on relative growth of muscles. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 6, 298.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M. & Berg, R. T. (1966 b). A classification of bovine muscles based on their relative growth patterns. Res. vet. Sci., 7, 326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butterfield, R. M., Johnson, E. R. & Pryor, W. J. (1971). A study of growth in calves. I. Carcass tissues. J. agric. Sci. Camb. 76, 453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsley, F. W. H., McDonald, I. & Fowler, V. R. (1964). The effect of plane of nutrition on the carcases of pigs and lambs when variations in fat content are excluded. Anim. Prod. 6, 141.Google Scholar
Huxley, J. S. (1932). Problems of Relative Growth. 1st ed., pp. 4–37. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
McMeekan, C. P. (1940). Growth and development of the pig, with special reference to carcase quality characteristics. I. J. agric. Sci. Camb. 30, 276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palsson, H. & Verges, J. B. (1952). Effects of plane of nutrition on growth and development of carcase quality in lambs. J. agric. Sci. Camb. 42, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, L. R. (1948). The growth of lambs before and after birth in relation to the level of nutrition. I, II, III. J. agric. Sci. Camb. 38, 7, 243, 367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar