Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:45:13.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transition from anoestrus in the mare and the effects of artificial lighting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

John Burkhardt
John Burkhardt
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The recommencement of the sexual rhythm from deep anoestrus, is described in barren pony mares. Follicular development and oestrus follow after an interval of preliminary changes in the ovaries and accessory reproductive organs.

2. The onset of oestrus can be accelerated by general irradiation with strong artificial light. Local irradiation with a mercury vapour lamp has no effect on the ovaries.

3. Pregnant matings will result from such artificially induced heat periods provided that ovulation is induced.

4. Doses of less than 10 c.c. of sperm injected will cause fertilization when ovulation is so induced.

5. There is a close connexion between the shedding of the coat and renewed ovarian activity.

6. The stimulus to the ovaries probably passes through the eyes as in the ferret.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , January 1947 , pp. 64 - 68
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1947

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baker, J. R. & Ranson, R. M. (1932). Proc. Roy. Soc. B, 110, 313.Google Scholar
Bissonnette, T. H. (1932). Proc Roy. Soc. B, 110, 322.Google Scholar
Bissonnette, T. H. (1933). Quart. Rev. Biol. 8, 201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bukkhardt, J. A. (1946). In the Press.Google Scholar
Covington, N. G. (1935). J. Amer. Vet. Med. Ass. no. 39.Google Scholar
Day, F. T. (1946). Personal communication.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. & Marshall, F. H. A. (1925). Reproduction in the Rabbit. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Hill, M. & Parkes, A. S. (1933). Proc. Roy. Soc. B, 113, 537.Google Scholar
Hill, M. & Parkes, A. S. (1934). Proc. Roy. Soc. B, 115, 14.Google Scholar
Marshall, F. H. A. (1910). The Physiology of Reproduction. London.Google Scholar
Marshall, F. H. A. (1932). Nature, Lond., no. 129, p. 344Google Scholar
Marshall, F. H. A. & Bowden, F. P. (1934 a). J. Exp. Biol. 11, 409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, F. H. A. & Bowden, F. P. (1934 b). J. Exp. Biol. 11, 417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, F. H. A. & Bowden, F. P. (1934 c). J. Exp. Biol. 11, 418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smelser, G. K., Walton, A. & Whetham, E. O. (1934). J. Exp. Biol. 11, 352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar