Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T14:39:29.184Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variation in efficiency of food utilization in twin calves I. Individual variation and age trends in efficiency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

C. S. Taylor ,
J. H. Watson  and
G. B. Young
C. S. Taylor
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Animal Breeding Research Organization, Edinburgh 9
J. H. Watson
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Animal Breeding Research Organization, Edinburgh 9
G. B. Young
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Animal Breeding Research Organization, Edinburgh 9
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Efficiency of food utilization from 2 to 18 weeks of age has been examined in 12 MZ and 7 DZ pairs of twin calves fed standard rations. Mean efficiency reached a maximum at about 6 weeks of age; weaning brought about a rapid decline followed by a recovery. Animals became more alike in efficiency as their ages increased.

Those animals least efficient shortly after birth were most adversely affected by weaning, although they tended to be relatively more efficient when fully established on either milk or solid food.

Relative to the fairly closely replicated age-efficiency trends of identical twins, different pairs followed different trends. These trends, which primarily reflected the variable success with which the calves adapted to new diets, were subject to some genetic control.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 59 , Issue 3 , November 1962 , pp. 287 - 293
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brody, S. (1945). Bioenergetics and Growth. New York: Reinhold Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Donald, H. P. (1953). J. Dairy Res. 20, 335.Google Scholar
Donald, H. P. (1958). Proc. Xth International Congr. Gen. University Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Hansson, A., Brannang, G. E. & Claesson, O. (1953). Acta Agric. Scandin. III, 1, 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelms, G. & Bogart, R. (1955). J. Anim. Sci. 14, 970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, J. H. B. (1958). Scientific Principles of Feeding Farm Livestock. Proc. of Conf. at Brighton. London: Farmer and Stockbreeder Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Steensberg, V. (1947). J. Nutr. 1, 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Es, A. J. H. (1961). Between-animal Variation in the Amount of Energy Required for the Maintenance of Cows. Wageningen: Centrum voor Landbouw-publikaties en Landboiewdocumentalie.Google Scholar
Watson, J. A. S. & More, J. A. (1949). Agriculture. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar