Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-j7khd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T22:41:53.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variation in methane production by sheep fed every two hours

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. C. Mathers  and
D. E. Walters
J. C. Mathers
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Biology, University of Cambridge
D. E. Walters
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Council Statistics Group, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3DX
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Four sheep were maintained on a pelleted diet based on barley straw, sunflower-seed meal and barley which was offered at 2 h intervals by mechanical feeders. In each of two periods approximately 3 weeks apart, methane production was measured continuously for 6 h in each animal. Despite the frequent feeding regime, methane output varied markedly with time increasing after feeding and then declining. Serial correlation analysis indicated a rhythmical variation of period 2 h which was confirmed by Fourier series analysis for all but one data set. The observations suggest that even with frequent feeding, there is considerable deviation from steady state in the rate of carbohydrate fermentation in the rumen.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 98 , Issue 3 , June 1982 , pp. 633 - 638
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Beever, D. E., Harrison, D. G., Thomson, D. J., Cammell, S. B. & Osbourn, D. F. (1974). A method for the estimation of dietary and microbial protein in duodenal digesta of ruminants. British Journal of Nutrition, 99–112.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1967). The Energy Metabolism of Ruminants(revised edn.). London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Clapperton, J. L. (1965). Prediction of the amount of methane produced by ruminants. British Journal of Nutrition 19, 511–522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blaxter, K. L., Graham, N. McC & Wainman, F. W. (1956). Some observations on the digestibility of food by sheep, and on related problems. British Journal of Nutrition 10, 69–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bliss, C. I. (1970). Statistics in Biology, vol. 2. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Boxall, R. C. (1972). The utilization of molassed sugar beet pulp and urea in ruminant diets. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Czerkawski, J. W., Harfoot, C. G. & Breckenridge, G. (1972). The relationship between methane production and concentration of hydrogen in the aqueous and gaseous phases during rumen fermentation in vitro. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 35, 537–551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Demeyer, D. I. & Van Nevel, C. J. (1975). Methanogenesis, an integrated part of carbohydrate fermentation. In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant (ed. McDonald, I. W. and Warner, A. C. I.). Armidale, Australia: University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Graham, N. McC (1967). Effects of feeding frequency on energy and nitrogen balance in sheep given a ground and pelleted forage. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 18, 467–483.Google Scholar
Gray, F. V., Weller, R. A., Pilgrim, A. F. & Jones, G. B. (1967). Rates of production of volatile fatty acids in the rumen. V. Evaluation of fodders in terms of volatile fatty acid produced in the rumen of the sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 18, 625–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grovum, W. L. & Williams, V. J. (1973). Rates of passage of digesta in sheep. 3. Differential rates of passage of water and dry matter from the reticulorumen, abomasum and caecum and proximal colon. British Journal of Nutrition 30, 231–240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hungate, R. E. (1966). The Rumen and its Microbes. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Leng, R. A. (1970). Formation and production of volatile fatty acids in the rumen. In Physiology of Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant (ed. Phillipson, A. T.). Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Oriel Press.Google Scholar
Leng, R. A. & Leonard, G. J. (1965). Measurement of the rates of production of acetic, propionic and butyric acids in the rumen of sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 19, 469–484.Google Scholar
Mathers, J. C. (1973). The effect of chemical additives on methane production in the ruminant. Dissertation for the Diploma in Nutrition, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mathers, J. C. (1979). Interrelationships between energy and protein metabolism in the rumen. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Minson, D. J. & Cowper, J. L. (1966). Diurnal variations in the excretion of faeces and urine by sheep fed once daily or at hourly intervals. British Jcurnal of Nutrition 20, 757–764.Google Scholar
Morant, S. V., Ridley, J. L. & Sutton, J. D. (1978). A model for the estimation of volatile fatty acid production in the rumen in non-steady-state conditions. British Journal of Nutrition 39, 451–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, R. M., Bryant, A. M. & Leng, R. A. (1976). Rates of production of methane in the rumen and large intestine of sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 36, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, R. M., Bryant, A. M. & Leng, R. A. (1978). Methane production in the rumen and lower gut of sheep given lucerne chaff: effect of level of intake. British Journal of Nutrition 39, 337–345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillipson, A. T. (1952 a). The fatty acids present in the rumen of lambs fed on a flaked maize ration. British Journal of Nutrition 6, 190–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillipson, A. T. (1952 b). The passage of digesta from the abomasum of sheep. Journal of Physiolcgy 116, 84–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, J. D. & Oldham, J. D. (1977). Feed evaluation by measurement of sites of digestion in cannulated ruminants. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 36, 203–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed