Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T20:37:06.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weed control of irrigated peanuts in an arid zone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. Amir  and
N. Lifshitz
J. Amir
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel
N. Lifshitz
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Weed control in irrigated peanuts was evaluated under arid conditions over an 8-year period. Weed competition during the first 8 weeks of the growing season, affected the yield in three out of eight experiments. Mechanical cultivation and herbicides alone or in combination did not control the weed population completely. The best weed control was accomplished by the combination of two herbicides, a system which allowed a complementary effect and long-term control of annual weeds.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 86 , Issue 3 , June 1976 , pp. 623 - 626
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amir, J. (1964). Weed control trials in groundnuts. Proceedings 1st Israel Weed Control Conference. pp. 1–8. (Hebrew, with English abstracts.)Google Scholar
Cabgill, L. R. & Santelman, P. W. (1971). Influence of peanut seed quality and variety on susceptibility to herbicides. Agronomy Journal 63, 98–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elal, G. & Luz, E. (1965). Trials with selective preemergence herbicides in groundnuts. Proceedings Israel Weed Control Conference 2nd Annual Meeting. pp. 29–31. (Hebrew, with English abstracts.)Google Scholar
Hauser, E. W. & Parham, S. A. (1969). Effects of annual weeds and cultivation on the yield of peanuts. Weed Research 9, 192–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, L. V., Peeper, & Santelman, P. W. (1968). Influence of soil temperature and moisture on peanut injury from amiben, trifluralin and vernolate. Proceedings Society Weed Control Conference 21, 364.Google Scholar
Horowitz, M. & Amir, J. (1965). Experiments with herbicides in groundnuts. Hassadeh 45, 663–6. (In Hebrew.)Google Scholar
Lifshitz, N. (1959). Weed control in groundnuts. Hassadeh 39, 649–50. (In Hebrew.)Google Scholar
Lifshitz, N. (1970). Weed Control in groundnuts in Israel. Proceedings 10th British Weed Control Conference, pp. 389–97.Google Scholar
Oram, P. A. (1961). Experiments on the control of weeds in groundnuts in Tripolitania. Weed Research 1, 211–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, E. J. & Lowance, S. A. (1971). Establishment of Crownvetch with herbicides. Agronomy Journal 63, 230–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santelman, P. W., Matlock, R. S. & Six, L. (1967). Phytotoxicity of herbicides to Spanish peanuts as influenced by planting depth and simulated rainfall. Crop Science 7, 365–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, R. G. & Torrie, J. H. (1960). Principles and Procedures of Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Upchurch, R. P., Selman, F. L. & Webster, H. L. (1968). Incorporated vernolate and other weed control treatments for peanut production. Weed Science 16, 317–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar